Search

848 results for “Ford Motor Company”, page 15 of 43

1. Court case · Kentucky Court of Appeals · February 6, 2009 · in the opinion

   RT Vanderbilt Company, Inc. v. Franklin (2009)

   …jury trial was held against Vanderbilt and three remaining defendants, General Motors, Ford Motor, and Pneumo Abex. General Motors and Pneumo Abex settled during the trial. The jury assessed damages of $5,200,000 and allocated…

2. Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Illinois · September 21, 2015 · in the opinion

   Kochera v. General Electric Company (2015)

   …806 (7th Cir. 2013) (Daubert "remains the gold standard for evaluating the reliability of expert testimony."). The Seventh Circuit's Opinion in Smith v. Ford Motor Co., 215 F.3d 713 (7th Cir. 2000) provides the…

3. Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · December 3, 2020 · in the opinion

   Massachusetts Bay Insurance Company v. Adkins (2020)

   …defendant where their claims and prayer align them with the defendant and pit them directly against the plaintiff, even if no parties assert claims against them." In re Ford Motor Co., 442 S.W.3d 265…

4. Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of Illinois · February 25, 2014 · in the opinion

   Quirin v. Lorillard Tobacco Company (2014)

   …v. A-C Prods. Liab. Trust, 424 F.3d 488, 492-93 (6th Cir. 2005); Smith v. Ford Motor Co., No. 2:08-cv-630, 2013 WL 214378, at [\1]-3 (D. Utah Jan. 18, 2014)…

5. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · April 28, 2022 · in the opinion

   Smeal v. Clark Equipment Company (2022)

   …product caused his harm, from those in which such likelihood is absent on account of only casual or minimal exposure to the defendant's product." Rost v. Ford Motor Co., 151 A.3d 1032 (Pa. 2016) …

6. Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · April 3, 2017 · in the opinion

   Woo v. General Electric Company (2017)

   …9\]. . . . In addition, there are some cases where the combination of two sound products creates a dangerous condition, and both manufacturers have a duty to warn. \[Ford Motor Co. v. Wood, 119 Md. App. 1, 34…

7. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · November 17, 2016 · in the opinion

   Sheppard v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company (2016)

   …in this district recognize that "\[f\]raud by silence. . . \is, by its very nature, difficult to plead with particularity.'" In re Ford Motor Co. Vehicle Paint Litig., No. 1063, 1997 WL 539665, at [\3] (E.D…

8. Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Kentucky · May 6, 2022 · in the opinion

   Papineau v. Brake Supply Company, Inc. (2022)

   …core issue in Ford. Because Brake Supply cannot show that Fras-Le purposefully availed itself of Kentucky, however, the Court does not reach this argument. Similarly, Fras-Le contends that haling a foreign company into court…

9. Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Illinois · June 25, 2010 · in the opinion

   Glein v. Boeing Company (2010)

   …a Viacom, Inc. f/k/a Westinghouse Electric Corp.; Certain Teed Corp.; Crown Cork & Seal Co.; Dana Corp.; Deere & Co.; Ford Motor Co.; Garlock Sealing Technologies, LLC; General Dynamics Corp.; General Electric Co.; Georgia Pacific, LLC;…

10. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Kansas · November 20, 2018 · in the opinion

    Little v. Budd Company (2018)

    …the total dose" which "is an \irrefutable scientific fact,' and it is \well-established' that the threshold level for developing mesothelioma is unknown." Id. (quoting Rost v. Ford Motor Co., 151 A.3d 1032, 1045 (Pa…

11. Court case · Delaware Supreme Court · April 18, 2016 · in the opinion

    Genuine Parts Company v. Cepec (2016)

    …half of all U.S. publicly traded companies and 65% of Fortune 500 companies are incorporated in Delaware."). \[111\] Daimler, 134 S. Ct. at 761. \[112\] See, e.g., Pitts v. Ford Motor Co., 127 F…

12. Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · September 17, 2024 · in the opinion

    Constantine v. Lenox Instrument Company (2024)

    …present purposes. Generally speaking, motions in limine are used to preclude the presentation of evidence that a party considers inadmissible or prejudicial. See Parr v. Ford Motor Co., 109 A.3d 682, 690 (Pa. Super. 2014…

13. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Missouri · January 30, 2018 · in the opinion

    MacCormack v. Ingersoll-Rand Company (2018)

    …that under some circumstances even in the case of default, where a party actively participated in the litigation previously, collateral estoppel would apply); see also Ellis v. Ford Motor Co., 628 F. Supp. 849, 857 (D…

14. Court case · California Court of Appeal · April 10, 2013 · in the opinion

    Webb v. Special Electric Company, Inc. (2013)

    …63; Vandermark v. Ford Motor Co. (1964) 61 Cal.2d 256, 262-263.) Strict liability is justified as a means to spread the costs of injuries resulting from dangerous and defective products among the products' manufacturers…

15. Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of Florida · March 29, 2016 · in the opinion

    Dugas v. 3M Company (2016)

    …of products liability" it is unsettled whether the consumer-expectation test, risk-utility test or both should be applied in evaluating an alleged defect. Force v. Ford Motor Co., 879 So. 2d 103, 106-07 (Fla…

16. Court case · California Court of Appeal · October 30, 2019 · in the opinion

    Lopez v. the Hillshire Brands Company (2019)

    …harm. It cites the rule that "\\[m\]ere presence at a site where asbestos was present is insufficient to establish legally significant asbestos exposure.'" (Petitpas v. Ford Motor Co. (2017) 13 Cal.App.5th 261, 288…

17. Court case · Rhode Island Superior Court · January 18, 2017 · in the opinion

    Murray v. 3M Company (2017)

    …are found to be in true conflict, then this Court shall apply Rhode Island's interest-weighing approach. See Turcotte v. Ford Motor Co., 494 F.2d 173, 176-77 (1st Cir. 1974). In Harodite Indus…

18. Court case · Rhode Island Superior Court · June 5, 2018 · in the opinion

    Turcotte v. 3M Company (2018)

    …turns to the two-step choice-of-law analysis, beginning with whether the laws of the two states in question are in conflict. Turcotte v. Ford Motor Co., 494 F.2d 173, 177 (1st Cir. 1974)…

19. Court case · California Court of Appeal · May 22, 2024 · in the opinion

    Williams v. JM Manufacturing Company, Inc. (2024)

    …the then-leading case on whether defendants owed a duty of care to prevent take-home or secondary asbestos exposure under California law, Campbell v. Ford Motor Co. (2012) 206 Cal.App.4th 15. (4 Cetrulo…

20. Court case · California Court of Appeal · March 8, 2018 · in the opinion

    Foglia v. Moore Dry Dock Company (2018)

    …transmission." (Id. at p. 1140; followed by Petitpas v. Ford Motor Co. (2017) 13 Cal.App.5th 261, 275-276.) The court limited the duty to "members of a worker's household, i.e., persons who…