No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

495 results for “Ford Motor Company”, page 15 of 25

  1. Court case · California Court of Appeal · April 26, 2012 · in the opinion

    Bankhead v. Pneumo Abex LLC (2012)

    …87 Cal.App.4th 953, 980.) The case law makes clear that "\[t\]o accomplish this purpose, the award must be assessed against the party actually responsible for the wrong." (Ford Motor Co. v. Home Ins…

  2. Court case · Virginia Supreme Court · January 10, 1992 · in the opinion

    Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. v. Watson (1992)

    …984, 989, 128 S.E.2d 273, 277 (1962) (citations omitted). See also Ford Motor Co. v. Phelps, 239 Va. 272, 276, 389 S.E.2d 454, 457 (1990); General Motors Corp. v. Lupica, 237 Va…

  3. Court case · Texas Supreme Court · June 5, 1998 · in the opinion

    Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. v. Malone (1998)

    …W.2d at 30. Once the defendant does so, information which might otherwise be irrelevant and not subject to discovery becomes both relevant and discoverable. See generally Ford Motor Co. v. Leggat, 904 S.W.2d…

  4. Court case · California Court of Appeal · October 22, 2014 · in the opinion

    Izell v. Union Carbide Corp. (2014)

    …Cal.App.4th 655, 690-691 \[71 Cal.Rptr.3d 775\].) As our Supreme Court stated in Johnson v. Ford Motor Co. (2005) 35 Cal.4th 1191 \[29 Cal.Rptr.3d 401, 113 P.3d 82…

  5. Court case · Maryland Court of Appeals · December 18, 2015 · in the opinion

    May v. Air & Liquid Systems Corp. (2015)

    …strict liability analysis. Common sense tells us that the pumps were what Respondents sold to the Navy, and the gaskets and packing are included within that product. We have studied Ford Motor Co. v. Wood and…

  6. Court case · California Supreme Court · January 12, 2012 · in the opinion

    O'neil v. Crane Co. (2012)

    …plaintiffs' assertion on appeal, the case had not been tried or submitted to the jury on the theory that Ford had a duty to warn about hazards in replacement brakes and clutches. (Ford Motor v. Wood…

  7. Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · August 5, 2014 · in the opinion

    Nelson v. Airco Welders Supply (2014)

    …Engineering, Ford Motor Co., Foseco, Inc., Foster Wheeler Corporation, Garlock, Inc., General Electric Company, General Motors Corp., George V. Hamilton, Inc., Georgia- Pacific Corporation, Gould Pumps, Inc., Green, Tweed & Company, Inc., Hajoca Plumbing Supply Company, Harnischfeger…

  8. Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · August 20, 2010 · in the opinion

    Laverty v. CSX Transportation, Inc. (2010)

    …BUDD COMPANY, CATERPILLAR, INC., CERTAIN-TEED CORPORATION, CONTINENTAL TEVES, INC., DAIMLER CHRYSLER CORPORATION, ENPRO INDUSTRIES, INC., FLEXO SUPPLY COMPANY, FORD CORPORATION, GARLOCK, INC., GENERAL ELECTRIC MOTOR COMPANY, FOSTER WHEELER ENERGY COMPANY, GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION, GEORGIA-PACIFIC…

  9. Court case · California Court of Appeal · November 21, 2014 · in the opinion

    Izell v. Union Carbide Corporation (2014)

    …(2008) 159 Cal.App.4th 655, 690-691.) As our Supreme Court stated in Johnson v. Ford Motor Co. (2005) 35 Cal.4th 1191, "\[t\]o consider the defendant's entire course of conduct in setting…

  10. Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · February 14, 2005 · in the opinion

    Lunsford v. Saberhagen Holdings, Inc. (2005)

    …103 Wash.2d 768, 774, 698 P.2d 77 (1985). ANALYSIS In Ulmer v. Ford Motor Co., 75 Wash.2d 522, 452 P.2d 729 (1969), the Washington Supreme Court adopted the Restatement (Second) of Torts…

  11. Court case · California Court of Appeal · September 24, 2012 · in the opinion

    Evans v. Certainteed Corp. (2012)

    …e.g. Campbell v. Ford Motor Co. (2012) 206 Cal.App.4th 15, 33.) A jury returned a verdict in favor of a plaintiff homemaker who suffered personal injuries caused by her exposure to asbestos dust…

  12. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Texas · March 1, 1983 · in the opinion

    Carter v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp. (1983)

    …Blickman, Inc. v. Chilton, 114 S.W.2d 646 (Tex.Civ.App. — Austin 1938), no writ; Ford Motor Co. v. Mathis, 322 F.2d 267, 272-74 (5th Cir.1963). These findings, in turn, entailed a…

  13. Court case · California Court of Appeal · March 17, 2017 · in the opinion

    Phillips v. Honeywell International Inc. (2017)

    …s determination of undue prejudice is subject to review under the abuse of discretion standard. (Donlen v. Ford Motor Co. (2013) 217 Cal.App.4th 138, 147.) When weighing probative value against the danger of prejudice…

  14. Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · September 16, 2024 · in the opinion

    Sorrentino v. Ammco Tools, Inc. (2024)

    …Law Ins. 1965). Lenhardt v. Ford Motor Co., 102 Wn.2d 208, 211, 683 P.2d 1097 (1984). Under those principles: (1) One who sells any product in a defective condition unreasonably dangerous to the user…

  15. Court case · California Court of Appeal · November 19, 2020 · in the opinion

    Mata v. Liberty Utilities (park Water) Corp. (2020)

    …Ford Motor Co. (1982) 32 Cal.3d 388, 402, a former Ford engineer and manager testified that Ford knew of the problem with the brakes on its Continental models because Ford had received customer and dealer…

  16. Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · November 18, 2009 · in the opinion

    Estate of Hicks v. Dana Companies, LLC (2009)

    …design choice, and not on the attributes of the product itself." Id. at 342, 528 A.2d at 594 (citing Lenhardt v. Ford Motor Co., 102 Wash.2d 208, 683 P.2d 1097 (1984)). Accordingly, the…

  17. Court case · Oklahoma Supreme Court · October 25, 2022 · in the opinion

    Galier v. Murco Wall Products, Inc. (2022)

    …showing." Ford [\301] Motor, 141 S. Ct. at 1026. The Court noted that indeed, \[it\] has stated that specific jurisdiction attaches in cases identical to the ones here—when a company like Ford serves a market…

  18. Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · December 19, 2019 · in the opinion

    Union Carbide Corporation v. Torres (2019)

    …810 (Tex. 2005). More than a scintilla of evidence exists when the evidence rises to a level that would enable reasonable and fair-minded people to differ in their conclusions. Ford Motor Co. v. Ridgway, 135…

  19. Court case · Wisconsin Court of Appeals · November 19, 2013 · in the opinion

    Lemberger v. Honeywell International, Inc. (2013)

    …309 Wis. 2d 541, 556, 749 N.W.2d 581, 589 (negligence); Austin v. Ford Motor Co., 86 Wis. 2d 628, 643, 273 N.W.2d 233, 239 (1979) (strict liability). The comparison to be made…

  20. Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Pennsylvania · January 7, 2022 · in the opinion

    Data v. Joy Global Underground Mining (2022)

    …where they have unquestionably suffered harm on account of a disease having a long latency period and must prove specific causation under prevailing Pennsylvania law which may be insurmountable." Rost v. Ford Motor Co., 637 Pa…