No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

292 results for “General Electric”, page 15 of 15

  1. Court case · California Court of Appeal · May 24, 2024 · in the opinion

    Perez v. Century Indemnity Co. (2024)

    …its van or stepped inside. We agree with plaintiffs that the brakes remained in Universal's possession as they lay untouched in the back of its van. (See General Casualty Co. of America v. Azteca Films…

  2. Court case · California Court of Appeal · March 15, 2016 · in the opinion

    DePREE v. BASF Catalysts LLC (2016)

    …auto body filler from Grand Auto, and it came in cans bearing the name "Bondo." Although Mr. DePree testified in general terms about his work involving Bondo, with one exception, he was unable to recall the…

  3. Court case · California Court of Appeal · November 6, 2020 · in the opinion

    Barr v. Parker-Hannifin Corp. (2020)

    …brought this asbestos fiber home on his clothing and person. Mezei based this testimony solely on Kleinberg's job title of welder and the general epidemiological literature showing increased rates of mesothelioma among shipyard welders. However…

  4. Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of California · March 31, 2021 · in the opinion

    Toy v. Warren Pumps (In re Asbestos, 2021)

    …es\] the \[expert's\] reasoning or methodology, using as appropriate such criteria as testability, publication in peer reviewed literature, and general acceptance." Id. at 564. III. DISCUSSION Defendants contend that Captain Burger should not be allowed…

  5. Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of California · September 27, 2023 · in the opinion

    Marcus v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2023)

    …officer removal statute, Leite, 749 F.3d at 1122 ("We recognize that defendants enjoy much broader removal rights under the federal officer removal statute than they do under the general removal statute\[.\]"); Durham, 445 F.3d…

  6. Court case · California Court of Appeal · April 25, 2022 · in the opinion

    Hahn v. New York Air Brake LLC (2022)

    …focus is on the facts that the plaintiff knew, not on whether the plaintiff subjectively knew she had a cause of action based on those facts. (General Motors Corp. v. Superior Court (1996) 48 Cal.App…

  7. Court case · California Court of Appeal · December 9, 2020 · in the opinion

    Hart v. Keenan Properties, Inc. (2020)

    …Dr. Horn based his testimony on the Rawlings summary. Instead, Dr. Horn relied on his general experience as a physician and hospital director, which provided a reasonable basis for his opinion regarding future medical costs. (§ 801…

  8. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of California · January 4, 2021 · in the opinion

    Person v. Perry (2021)

    …Id. at 676. IV. PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT\[2\] A. General Facts Alleged Plaintiff is an inmate at California Correctional Center — Susanville ("CCC-Susanville").\[3\] He alleges that its employees, Warden Suzanne Peery; SBT Mark Hodges; CPS…

  9. Court case · California Court of Appeal · September 17, 2009 · in the opinion

    Clemmer v. Thorpe Insulation Company (2009)

    …s and its trucks were present at the LBNS almost daily. Ay acknowledged that the federal government's General Services Administration (GSA) was the larger supplier; but Thorpe was the predominant supplier among the outside companies…

  10. Court case · California Court of Appeal · November 2, 2007 · in the opinion

    Foster Wheeler LLC v. Superior Court OF San Francisco County (2007)

    …tend to avoid unnecessary costs or delays. The court concluded that limiting instructions and instructions in general to the jury would allay the defense fears of prejudice. Code of Civil Procedure section 1048, subdivision (a) provides:…

  11. Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of California · June 20, 2017 · in the opinion

    Thrash v. Cirrus Enterprises, LLC (2017)

    …749 F.3d 1117, 1122 (9th Cir. 2014) ("We recognize that defendants enjoy much broader removal rights under the federal officer removal statute than they do under the general removal statute\[.\]"); Durham v. Lockheed Martin Corp…

  12. Court case · California Court of Appeal · August 2, 2021 · in the opinion

    Krueger v. Csaa Insurance Services, Inc. (2021)

    …as "\wrongdoing, harm, and causation.'" (Ibid.) The foregoing general rules are subject to various modifications and equitable exemptions that affect the initial accrual of a cause of action, the subsequent running of the limitation period, or…