378 results for “General Electric”, page 15 of 19
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · August 6, 2015 · in the opinion
Galasso v. BF Goodrich (Matter of New York City Asbestos Litig., 2015)
…affidavit of Joan M. Taffi, a Goodrich Corporation employee, does not contain any specificity beyond the general claim that "\[p\]rior to 1964, B.F. Goodrich Company produced and sold asbestos floor tile, as well as…
-
Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · May 11, 2018 · in the opinion
Mack Trucks, Inc. v. Coates (2018)
…PROCEEDINGS Until it closed in 1989, Marcantoni was a Baltimore-based general construction contracting company that specialized in highway and utility work for local governments in the greater Baltimore area. Its headquarters was located on Broening…
-
Court case · Connecticut Appellate Court · October 13, 2021 · in the opinion
Poce v. O & G Industries, Inc. (2021)
…whereby the plaintiff sought a determination as to which of its general liability insurance carriers were obligated to defend and indemnify the claims against it in light of multiple lawsuits alleging injuries from exposure to asbestos…
-
Court case · Kentucky Court of Appeals · June 2, 2017 · in the opinion
Landreth v. Brake Supply Company, Inc. (2017)
…however, must be reasonable, that is they must "indicate the probable, as distinguished from a possible cause." Briner v. General Motors Corporation, Ky., 461 S.W.2d 99, 101 (1970). Id. at 872-73. More recently…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · November 16, 2010 · in the opinion
Stewart v. Union Carbide Corporation (2010)
…by asbestos, that medical tests showed that there were asbestos fibers in his lungs, that such fibers are not found in the general population, and that he had had a significant exposure to asbestos. Based on…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · January 13, 2020 · in the opinion
Jackson v. Henry Co. (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2020)
…4 at 29:25-30:4). Plaintiffs then go on to show that in Henry's general catalog and Henry's commercial products catalog, it states that Henry did produce and manufacture asbestos-containing plastic roof…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · April 13, 2009 · in the opinion
Silvestro v. Kaiser Gypsum Company, Inc. (2009)
…to chrysotile." \[3\] Although Silvestro again worked in construction after his career as boiler repairman, the evidence showed that use of asbestos in construction materials (and in general) was being curtailed by the 1970's, and…
-
Court case · Missouri Supreme Court · May 22, 2018 · in the opinion
Accident Fund Insurance Company v. Casey (2018)
…then, within 90 days, filing a motion to substitute. Rule 52.13. But "\[a\]s a general proposition, the Missouri Rules of Civil Procedure, including its pleading requirements, do not apply to workers' compensation actions, unless…
-
Court case · Rhode Island Superior Court · July 29, 2008 · in the opinion
Clayton v. American Biltrate (2008)
…1263 (D.R.I. 1993). As a general note, to the extent Defendants in asbestos litigation choose to file motions for summary judgment before they have responded to plaintiffs' reasonable discovery requests—including, but not limited…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Central District of California · February 12, 2013 · in the opinion
Nelson v. Air and Liquid Systems Corp. (2013)
…2012) ("As a general rule, the existence of removal jurisdiction is determined at the time the removal petition is filed, irrespective of subsequent events. Federal courts have applied this general rule to federal officer removal jurisdiction…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · June 17, 2013 · in the opinion
Logan v. AP Moller-Maersk, Inc. (2013)
…warn Mr. Logan of the dangers associated with Calidria because it provided adequate warnings to GP. Plaintiffs submit that apart from special orders and test shipments which were not available to the general public, all asbestos…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of Pennsylvania · May 7, 1992 · in the opinion
Sealover v. Carey Canada (1992)
…112 S.Ct. 1671, 118 L.Ed.2d 391 (New Rule 238 withstands constitutional challenges on due process and equal protection grounds.); Leonard v. General Motors Corp., Civil No. 88-2380, slip op. at 5 (E…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · June 26, 2018 · in the opinion
Botta v. AERCO Int'l (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2018)
…1st Dept. 1984\]). Mass toxic tort cases, including asbestos cases, may be consolidated if they meet the requirements of the general rule governing consolidation of cases (In re Asbestos Litigation, 173 F.R.D. 81, 38…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · February 21, 2001 · in the opinion
Ehret v. Congoleum Corp. (2001)
…installment on [\373] the date the installment becomes due." The Commission's comment to subdivision (a) provided: "Subdivision (a) of Section 685.020 continues the general rule as to the time postjudgment interest commences to run…
-
Court case · Indiana Court of Appeals · January 10, 2002 · in the opinion
Harris v. AC & S., Inc. (2002)
…1995), trans. denied. In general, product liability actions must be brought within two years after the cause of action accrues or within ten years after the delivery of the product to the initial user or consumer…
-
Court case · Ohio Court of Appeals · May 5, 2016 · in the opinion
Estate OF Blandford v. AO Smith Corp. (2016)
…asbestos until the 1970s. Indeed, Rennecker states that Hart did have a general awareness about the hazards of asbestos when it became publicized, but he was not specific as to when that was. According to evidence…
-
Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · September 26, 2018 · in the opinion
Wallace & Gale Asbestos Settlement Trust v. Busch (2018)
…support a jury conclusion that W&G was the primary insulation contractor working at LRHS. This is not a case in which evidence was presented showing the general presence of asbestos-containing products at LRHS. Accordingly…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · November 22, 2010 · in the opinion
Larson v. Georgia Pacific (In re Asbestos Products Liability Litigation, 2010)
…Angell noted that Dr. Brody's expert testimony at trial will be limited to "general testimony about how asbestos causes cancer and may not include any opinion as to specific causation in this case." (Mem. Op…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · August 5, 2009 · in the opinion
Anderson v. Bondex Int'l (In re Asbestos Products Liability Litigation, 2009)
…address the standards pertaining to relation back, and then proceed to apply those standards to the case before us. Relation Back in General Relation back is governed by Fed.R.Civ.P. 15(c) which provides…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · March 16, 2017 · in the opinion
Cunningham v. Aerco Intl. (2017)
…generally that the law of different jurisdictions may apply, absent any analysis with respect to this issue, such general statement is an insufficient basis to deny consolidation. However, this determination does not preclude the parties from…