No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

434 results for “General Electric”, page 15 of 22

  1. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit · July 28, 2000 · in the opinion

    Orvosh v. Program OF Group Ins. for Salaried Emp. (2000)

    …Volkswagen, Orvosh worked in both the Paint Process Department and Paint Production Departments holding a variety of positions including senior chemist, senior lab engineer and general supervisor. In March of 1987, Orvosh's treating physician, Dr…

  2. Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of California · September 21, 2022 · in the opinion

    Darden v. Western Asbestos Settlement Trust (In re Western Asbestos Settlement Trust, 2022)

    …named in a release to be included in the release. "\[T\]o obtain summary judgment on the ground that a general release has discharged him from liability, a third party to the release agreement must affirmatively…

  3. Court case · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas · July 7, 1993 · in the opinion

    Behrendt v. GAF Corp. (1993)

    …fishing, woodworking. Mr. Behrendt's pain symptoms eventually led to a diagnosis of mesothelioma in December 1990. He was taken to the Emergency Room at Community General Osteopathic Hospital, Harrisburg, on December 23, 1990 with a…

  4. Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · August 22, 1991 · in the opinion

    Lilley v. Johns-Manville Corp. (1991)

    …asbestosis sufferers in general and specifically by a person with Mr. Lilley's type of symptoms. Id. at 41-46. Dr. Altschuler offered no testimony regarding Mr. Lilley's psychological profile nor the general psychological characteristics…

  5. Court case · Montana Workers' Comp. Court · May 5, 2014 · in the opinion

    Baeth v. Liberty NW Ins. Corp. (2014)

    …wrote that asbestos-related lung fibrosis "could not be excluded with certainty."\[131\] ¶ 76 "\[A\]s a general rule, the opinion of a treating physician is accorded greater weight than the opinions of other expert witnesses."…

  6. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit · March 30, 1984 · in the opinion

    In re Davis (1984)

    …672 F.2d 564 (5th Cir.1982). In general, the petitioner seeking such an order must show that no other adequate means exists to attain the requested relief and that his right to issuance of the…

  7. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Tennessee · December 6, 1988 · in the opinion

    Potts v. Celotex Corp. (1988)

    …pleural thickening or asbestosis, then this change in the law must come from the Supreme Court of Tennessee or the Tennessee General Assembly. It is not a change which this court is allowed to make. Therefore…

  8. Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · March 18, 2009 · in the opinion

    Hymel v. Eagle, Inc. (2009)

    …362 (La. 1980). It follows that the compromise instrument is governed by the same general rules of construction applicable to contracts. Brown, 630 So.2d at 748. When the words of a contract are clear and…

  9. Court case · Texas Supreme Court · November 30, 2000 · in the opinion

    Pustejovsky v. Rapid-American Corp. (2000)

    …American argues that Pustejovsky's lack of knowledge of the scope of his damages from his exposure to asbestos does not affect the accrual of his cause of action. Following these general rules, Rapid American contends…

  10. Court case · New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division · April 27, 1990 · in the opinion

    Jenkins v. Johns-Manville Products (1990)

    …BROCHIN. Lawrence G. Moncher, Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent-appellant Commissioner Of Labor, and respondent-cross-appellant in A-5659-86T7 (Robert J. Del Tufo, Attorney General of New Jersey, attorney; Lawrence G…

  11. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit · September 24, 1975 · in the opinion

    Karjala v. Johns-Manville Products Corp. (1975)

    …Karjala began to feel a shortness of breath, congestion, a loss of appetite, and general weakness. Suspecting that he might have tuberculosis, he had his chest x-rayed. The x-ray showed no evidence of tuberculosis…

  12. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Texas · November 12, 1990 · in the opinion

    Cimino v. Raymark Industries, Inc. (1990)

    …to concurrently produce a single injury, the plaintiff may recover from the defendant for the entire injury. Shipp v. General Motors Corporation, 750 F.2d 418, 425-26 (5th Cir.1985). The plaintiff need only show…

  13. Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · June 1, 1988 · in the opinion

    H & H Plumbing Co. v. Indus. Comm'n (1988)

    …on claimant's testimony regarding his work on the boilers and the appearance of the gaskets. The Commission also relied on the testimony of Norris, H & H's general foreman, that the gaskets contained asbestos. Moreover…

  14. Court case · California Court of Appeal · May 26, 1999 · in the opinion

    Howard v. Owens Corning (1999)

    …emotional distress, intentional tort, conspiracy [\389] and loss of consortium; and sought general, special and punitive damages against no fewer than 215 named defendants and 300 unnamed does. Specifically, the complaint alleged that as a result…

  15. Court case · Iowa Supreme Court · February 17, 1993 · in the opinion

    Beeman v. Manville Corp. Asbestos Fund (1993)

    …convincing, and satisfactory evidence. Iowa Code § 668A.1. Beeman apparently agrees that punitive damages may not be assessed against Keene based on the general knowledge of the asbestos industry. Instead, there must be clear, convincing, and…

  16. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit · January 21, 1985 · in the opinion

    Jackson v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp. (1985)

    …As a consequence, federal courts would become increasingly responsible for establishing a general federal tort law in a manner we think is inconsistent with the teachings of Erie and the logic behind our federal system. Cf…

  17. Court case · Indiana Court of Appeals · September 14, 2001 · in the opinion

    Parks v. AP Green Industries, Inc. (2001)

    …disease and its cause constitutes a new injury and the basis for a separate cause of action. In general, product liability actions must be brought within two years after the cause of action accrues or within…

  18. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · November 19, 1984 · in the opinion

    Colombo v. Johns-Manville Corp. (1984)

    13, 68 L.Ed.2d 1 (1981) (federal law shall govern issues arising in negligence actions under LHWCA section 5(b)) with Edmonds v. Compagnie Generale Atlantique, 443 U.S. 256, 272 n. 31, 99 S…

  19. Court case · North Carolina Court of Appeals · October 6, 2015 · in the opinion

    Ketchie v. Fieldcrest Cannon, Inc. (2015)

    …Ms. Ketchie was diagnosed with asbestosis as a result of her exposure to asbestos during her employment with Fieldcrest. The General Assembly created the Security Association on 1 October 1986 after several large, self-insured trucking…

  20. Court case · Florida District Court of Appeal · December 31, 1985 · in the opinion

    Eagle-Picher Industries, Inc. v. Cox (1985)

    …at 120. The rule against splitting was designed to function in precisely the opposite manner and to rigidly apply it here would do "violence to the essence and purpose of the general rule." Martinez-Ferrer v…