No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

495 results for “Ford Motor Company”, page 16 of 25

  1. Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · June 25, 2007 · in the opinion

    Lunsford v. Saberhagen Holdings, Inc. (2007)

    …86 Wash.2d 145, 148-50, 542 P.2d 774 (1975); Ulmer v. Ford Motor Co., 75 Wash.2d 522, 531-32, 452 P.2d 729 (1969). Because Saberhagen had not presented its retroactivity argument to…

  2. Court case · Texas Supreme Court · October 22, 2010 · in the opinion

    Robinson v. Crown Cork & Seal Co., Inc. (2010)

    …cited in Lucas v. United States, 757 S.W.2d 687, 700 (Tex. 1988); see also Ford Motor Co. v. Sheldon, 22 S.W.3d 444, 456 (Tex. 2000) (defining a "special law" as one that…

  3. Court case · California Court of Appeal · May 18, 2000 · in the opinion

    Wilson v. John Crane, Inc. (2000)

    …society ascribes some fault to this conduct." (Id. at p. 1188, 272 Cal.Rptr. 304.) Quoting Montez v. Ford Motor Co. \[ (1980) \] 101 Cal.App.3d 315, 318-319, 161 Cal.Rptr. 578, the court continued…

  4. Court case · Missouri Court of Appeals · September 22, 2015 · in the opinion

    Foreman v. AO Smith Corp. (2015)

    …Reis v. Peabody Coal Co., 997 S.W.2d 49, 58 (Mo. App. E.D. 1999) (quoting Ernst v. Ford Motor Co., 813 S.W.2d 910, 921 (Mo. App. W.D. 1991)). Thus, Missouri procedural…

  5. Court case · California Court of Appeal · June 24, 2020 · in the opinion

    Collantes v. Elementis Chemicals, Inc. (2020)

    …Familian Corp. (2017) 18 Cal.App.5th 969, 979 (Turley).) "\If there has been no exposure, there is no causation.'" (Petitpas v. Ford Motor Co. (2017) 13 Cal.App.5th 261, 289; see Izell v. Union…

  6. Court case · Florida District Court of Appeal · November 9, 2016 · in the opinion

    Crane Co. v. DeLisle (2016)

    …exposed to asbestos-containing products from the following nonparty defendants: Garlock Sealing Technologies, LLC; A.W. Chesterton Co.; Ford Motor Co.; Honeywell International, Inc., f/k/a Allied Signal, as successor in interest to Allied Corp.…

  7. Court case · California Supreme Court · February 18, 2010 · in the opinion

    McCann v. Foster Wheeler, LLC (2010)

    …of Brennan, J.); see also Turcott v. Ford Motor Co. (1st Cir. 1974) 494 F.2d 173, 173-174.) \[14\] Because we conclude that under California's choice-of-law principles the law of Oklahoma should…

  8. Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · August 22, 2018 · in the opinion

    Finch v. BASF Catalysts LLC (2018)

    …22]-23 (E.D.N.C. Sept. 30, 2014), on reconsideration sub nom. Yates v. Ford Motor Co., No. 5:12-CV-752-FL, 2015 WL 9222834 (E.D.N.C. Dec. 17, 2015) (applying "the…

  9. Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of Georgia · November 21, 2014 · in the opinion

    Thurmon v. AW Chesterton, Inc. (2014)

    …aims of the MDL process and lessen the system's effectiveness." Hill v. Ford Motor Co., 975 F.Supp.2d 1351, 1358 (N.D.Ga. 2013) (quoting In re Ford Motor Co., 591 F.3d 406…

  10. Court case · California Court of Appeal · September 29, 2020 · in the opinion

    Bader v. Avon Products, Inc. (2020)

    …Supreme Court may soon shed light on this issue in Bandemer v. Ford Motor Co. (Minn. 2019) 931 N.W.2d 744, Supreme Court Minutes, January 17, 2020, certiorari granted sub nom. Ford Motor Co. v…

  11. Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · November 7, 2014 · in the opinion

    Logan v. Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. (2014)

    …collecting and rejecting cases applying a "modified or adjusted" Lohrmann test in mesothelioma cases as inconsistent with a prediction that the North Carolina Supreme Court would adopt the Lohrmann test); see also Ford Motor Co. v…

  12. Court case · California Court of Appeal · July 16, 2015 · in the opinion

    Leidig v. Zenith Electronics LLC (2015)

    …1196; see also Grimshaw v. Ford Motor Co. (1981) 119 Cal.App.3d 757, 788-789.) The court also sustained relevance objections to the supplemental evidence of specifications calling for asbestos strips in two Zenith radio…

  13. Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of Illinois · April 11, 2022 · in the opinion

    Lishman v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2022)

    …waive personal jurisdiction. The Court next turns to the merits of the personal jurisdiction defense. As discussed, personal jurisdiction is either general or specific. See Ford Motor Co. v. Montana Eight Judicial District Court, 141 S…

  14. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · February 10, 2011 · in the opinion

    Breedlove v. CSX Transportation (In re Liability Litigation, 2011)

    …permitted, over objection by a defendant, in at least one other MDL case before this Court. See Kirkland v. Ford Motor Co., 09-74077: Doc. 65 \[December 1, 2010 Order of the Honorable Eduardo C. Robreno…

  15. Court case · California Court of Appeal · October 22, 2014 · in the opinion

    Izell v. Union Carbide Corporation (2014)

    …(2008) 159 Cal.App.4th 655, 690-691.) As our Supreme Court stated in Johnson v. Ford Motor Co. (2005) 35 Cal.4th 1191, "\[t\]o consider the defendant's entire course of conduct in setting…

  16. Court case · California Court of Appeal · August 6, 2013 · in the opinion

    Klinger v. Alderete (2013)

    …Klinger, Donadio learned that Alderete was suffering from lung cancer and not mesothelioma. Donadio also stated that the decision in Campbell v. Ford Motor Co. (2012) 206 Cal.App.4th 15 (Campbell), issued on May 21…

  17. Court case · Maryland Court of Appeals · July 8, 2013 · in the opinion

    Georgia Pacific v. Farrar (2013)

    …Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., 125 Ohio St.3d 510, 929 N.E.2d 448 (2010); Campbell v. Ford Motor Co., 206 Cal.App.4th 15, 141 Cal. Rptr.3d 390 (2012); and In re Eighth Judicial…

  18. Court case · California Court of Appeal · May 12, 1998 · in the opinion

    Arena v. Owens Corning Corp. (1998)

    …in a position to exert pressure on the manufacturer to that end; the retailer's strict liability thus serves as an added incentive to safety." (Vandermark v. Ford Motor Co. (1964) 61 Cal.2d 256, 262…

  19. Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · March 7, 2005 · in the opinion

    Brown v. Crown Cork & Seal Company (2005)

    …at 57. Brown recalled that he worked on various makes of cars, including General Motors, Chrysler, Plymouth, Dodge, and Ford. After removing old brakes from a car, Brown would take them to the dealership for that…

  20. Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · November 24, 2014 · in the opinion

    Shipley v. Hoke (2014)

    …regarding the effect of termination of supplementary proceedings. ¶ 75 Whether the court had subject-matter jurisdiction to entertain a claim is a question of law that we review de novo. Crossroads Ford Truck Sales, Inc. v…