No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

736 results for “Ford Motor Company”, page 16 of 37

  1. Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Illinois · September 2, 2015 · in the opinion

    Bell v. Abb Group, Inc. (2015)

    …806 (7th Cir. 2013) (Daubert "remains the gold standard for evaluating the reliability of expert testimony."). The Seventh Circuit's Opinion in Smith v. Ford Motor Co., 215 F.3d 713 (7th Cir. 2000) provides the…

  2. Court case · California Court of Appeal · January 21, 2016 · in the opinion

    Casey v. Kaiser Gypsum Co. Inc. (2016)

    …701.) Accordingly, we conclude excluding reference to the first jury's determination that Kaiser Gypsum was 3.5 percent at fault did not prejudice Kaiser Gypsum. White v. Ford Motor Co. (9th Cir. 2007) 500 F…

  3. Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington · December 21, 2021 · in the opinion

    United States Fidelity and Guaranty v. Ulbricht (2021)

    …F/V St. Patrick, 816 F.2d 1345, 1352 (9th Cir. 1987) (quoting Polk v. Ford Motor Co., 529 F.2d 259, 271 (8th Cir. 1976)), opinion modified on reh'g, 866 F.2d 318 (9th…

  4. Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · December 28, 2000 · in the opinion

    Hollingsworth v. Connor (2000)

    …uniform, but an "injury" does not arise until symptoms are manifested while the harm for a fatal and irreversible "disease" arises as soon as the cellular change develops. Our recent decisions in Ford \[Motor Co. v…

  5. Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of Illinois · February 26, 2014 · in the opinion

    Quirin v. Lorillard Tobacco Co. (2014)

    …a substantial factor causing an injury. Id., 177 Ill.Dec. 379, 603 N.E.2d at 455-57. Cf. Ford Motor [\920] Co. v. Boomer, 285 Va. 141, 736 S.E.2d 724, 729-30 (2013)…

  6. Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · February 19, 2020 · in the opinion

    Coogan v. Borg-Warner Morse Tec Inc. (2020)

    …We agree with the Coogans. a. Legal Principles In Ulmer v. Ford Motor Co., the Supreme Court adopted the rule of strict liability for product manufacturers stated in § 402A of the Restatement (Second) of Torts (Am…

  7. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Maryland · June 12, 2020 · in the opinion

    Curtin v. Cyprus Amax Minerals Co. (2020)

    …issue, and the Eleventh Circuit has held that "the loss of a valid statute of limitations defense \[does not\] constitute a bar to a dismissal without prejudice." McCants v. Ford Motor Co., 781 F.2d 855…

  8. Court case · California Court of Appeal · February 25, 2009 · in the opinion

    Taylor v. Elliott Turbomachinery Co. Inc. (2009)

    …2001) 26 Cal.4th 465, 478-479 \[110 Cal.Rptr.2d 370, 28 P.3d 116\], quoting Vandermark v. Ford Motor Co. (1964) 61 Cal.2d 256, 261 \[37 Cal.Rptr. 896, 391 P.2d 168…

  9. Court case · California Court of Appeal · January 27, 2021 · in the opinion

    Morgan v. JM Manufacturing Co., Inc. (2021)

    …mind. Morgan's argument relies on and quotes from Romo v. Ford Motor Co. (2002) 99 Cal.App.4th 1115 \[122 Cal.Rptr.2d 139\] (Romo), vacated on other grounds in Ford Motor Co. v. Romo…

  10. Court case · New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division · June 2, 2022 · in the opinion

    English v. Avon Prods., Inc. (2022)

    …Shulton pursuant to CPLR 302(a)(1), which applies by its terms, and that the exercise of jurisdiction over Shulton is also compatible with due process (see Ford Motor Co. v Montana Eighth Judicial Dist. Court…

  11. Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · May 4, 2006 · in the opinion

    Robinson v. Crown Cork & Seal Co., Inc. (2006)

    …893 S.W.2d at 518. A. The Applicable Law. A special law is defined as one "\limited to a particular class of persons distinguished by some characteristic other than geography.'" Ford Motor Co. v. Sheldon…

  12. Court case · Oregon Court of Appeals · March 4, 2009 · in the opinion

    Mason v. Mt. St. Joseph, Inc. (2009)

    …474, 155 P.3d 52 (2007); Simonsen v. Ford Motor Co., 196 Or.App. 460, 102 P.3d 710 (2004) (liberal construction of operative pleading in assessing sufficiency of claims under applicable statute of limitations). In…

  13. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · February 16, 2011 · in the opinion

    Anderson v. Salmon Bay and Gravel Co. (In re Asbestos Products Liability Litigation, 2011)

    …Schiff, 602 F.3d 152, 172 (3d Cir. April 7, 2010) (quoting Pineda v. Ford Motor Co., 502 F.3d 237, 243-44 (3d Cir. 2008)). Defendant has not challenged the qualification of Plaintiffs' experts, so…

  14. Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Illinois · September 28, 2011 · in the opinion

    Vickroy v. AW Chesterton, Inc. (2011)

    …Corp.; Chrysler, LLC; Econolite Traffic Engineering & Maintenance, Inc.; Flexo Supply Co., d/b/a Stovey Co.; Ford Motor Co.; Foster Wheeler Energy Corp.; Garlock, Inc.; Genuine Parts Co.; Georgia Pacific Corp.; Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.; Honeywell…

  15. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit · May 16, 2016 · in the opinion

    Hassell v. The Budd Co. (In re Asbestos Products Liability Lit.(no. VI), 2016)

    …SBRMCOA, LLC v. Bayside Resort, Inc., 707 F.3d 267, 272-73 (3d Cir.2013) (quoting Ford Motor Co. v. Summit Motor Prods., Inc., 930 F.2d 277, 284-85 (3d Cir. 1991)). In this case…

  16. Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · September 17, 2024 · in the opinion

    Constantine v. Lenox Instrument Co., Inc. (2024)

    …establish proximate \[or legal\] causation, a plaintiff must adduce evidence to show that the defendant's act was a substantial factor in bringing about the plaintiff's harm." Rost v. Ford Motor Co., 637 Pa. 625…

  17. Court case · California Court of Appeal · December 10, 1985 · in the opinion

    Kaminski v. Western MacArthur Co. (1985)

    …v. IRM Corporation (1985) 38 Cal.3d 454 \[213 Cal. Rptr. 213, 698 P.2d 116\]; Vandermark v. Ford Motor Co. (1964) 61 Cal.2d 256 \[37 Cal. Rptr. 896, 391 P.2d 168\]; Barth v…

  18. Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · August 31, 1990 · in the opinion

    Celotex Corp. v. Tate (1990)

    …Manufacturing Company products.\[1\] When considering a "no evidence," "insufficient evidence," or "against the great weight and preponderance" point of error, we will follow the well-established test set forth in Pool v. Ford Motor Co…

  19. Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · May 9, 2017 · in the opinion

    Startley v. Welco Mfg. Co. (2017)

    …Appeals recently decided a case in which a brake worker had inhaled asbestos dust from installing the brake products of six different manufacturers. Vaughn v. Ford Motor Co., 91 S.W.3d 387, 393 (Tex.App…

  20. Court case · California Court of Appeal · August 8, 2018 · in the opinion

    Alfaro v. Colgate-Palmolive Co. (Laosd Asbestos Cases, 2018)

    …the determination of whether these fees were reasonably necessary, are issues left to the discretion of the trial court." (Adams v. Ford Motor Co. (2011) 199 Cal.App.4th 1475, 1484 \[132 Cal.Rptr.3d 424…