376 results for “General Electric”, page 16 of 19
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Illinois · June 9, 2014 · in the opinion
Mohler v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2014)
…a)(1).\[1\] Plaintiff now seeks remand of this matter, arguing that the statute does not apply. STANDARD In general, any civil action filed in state court may be removed to the district court if this…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of California · May 3, 2012 · in the opinion
Brantley v. Borg-Warner Morse Tec, Inc. (2012)
…Federal officer removal, however, is an exception to this general rule. Because the federal government can act only through its officers and agents, it would be difficult to find those to act on its behalf if…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · August 2, 2012 · in the opinion
Brewer v. Crane Co. (2012)
…manual, which he described as a "Navy document that originated with the manufacturer." These general statements do not constitute evidence that Crane specified or required the use of asbestos in its replacement gaskets and packing. The…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Virginia · April 27, 2020 · in the opinion
Mullinex v. John Crane, Inc. (2020)
…§ 1333(1) and 46 U.S.C. § 30101 and the general admiralty and maritime law of the United States." ECF No. 1-4 ¶ 7. JCI does not seek to dismiss any particular claim in the Amended…
-
Court case · U.S. Bankruptcy Court, Northern District of Illinois · March 9, 1987 · in the opinion
In re Unr Industries, Inc. (1987)
…what is unclear is the extent to which such noncreditors can be bound by the case in general and the plan in particular. There is no doubt that those exposed before the petition and individuals who…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of Illinois · July 14, 2014 · in the opinion
Smith v. Crane Co. (2014)
…there are persuasive indications that the highest state court would decide the issue differently." Allen, 128 F.3d at 466; Clarin Corp. v. Massachusetts General Life Ins. Co., 44 F.3d 471, 474 (7th Cir. 1994)…
-
Court case · Virginia Supreme Court · November 1, 2012 · in the opinion
Gibbs v. Newport News Shipbuilding and Drydock Company (2012)
…hazard of life itself. It is difficult to imagine that the General Assembly intended to include it within the term "contract of hire," however broadly defined. For the purposes of this appeal, it is not necessary…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · March 8, 2017 · in the opinion
Charlevoix v. Caterpillar, Inc. (2017)
…must "assess the general features of the type of incident involved," to determine whether the incident has "a potentially disruptive impact on maritime commerce\[.\]" Second, a court must determine whether "the general character" of the "activity…
-
Court case · Rhode Island Superior Court · May 9, 2011 · in the opinion
Brandt v. AW Chesterton Company (2011)
…Mr. Brandt's exposure chart names Mack and his deposition testimony, albeit not explicitly identifying Mack, confirms the general context for that exposure, Plaintiff has shown sufficient evidence of identification to reach a jury. Therefore, after…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · March 27, 2013 · in the opinion
Jones v. John Crane, Inc. (2013)
…I.\[4\] Except as to the named defendants, the FAC in Jones II was identical to the Jones I complaint with regard to the language in the general allegations, the first cause of action for negligence…
-
Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · January 17, 1989 · in the opinion
Falk v. Keene Corporation (1989)
…effects of human exposure to asbestos. Initially, defendant Raymark reserved "the right to direct and ... to use the general information \[from Dr. Demopoulos's testimony\] in closing argument." Once, however, it was apparent that appellants sought…
-
Court case · Rhode Island Superior Court · July 15, 2013 · in the opinion
Sweredoski v. Alfa Laval, Inc. (2013)
…recognizing that "evidence of settlement negotiations is generally inadmissible under \[Rule 408\] as irrelevant and contrary to public policy"). However, the discoverability of settlement information is governed by our state's general discovery rule, Super. R…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Wisconsin · July 7, 2017 · in the opinion
Carroll v. John Crane, Inc. (2017)
…defendant's broadly-worded motion is GRANTED only as to any general references to the time or money spent defending this lawsuit and as to any references to defendant's wealth during the liability phase of…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · October 22, 2010 · in the opinion
Faddish v. Warren Pumps, LLC (2010)
…Warren's objection that Mr. Faddish's testimony regarding pumps is too general to support an inference of Warren's liability is overruled, as Plaintiff's expert testimony is sufficient to raise a genuine issue of…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Alabama · September 29, 2011 · in the opinion
Kite v. Bill Vann Company, Inc. (2011)
…her under color of such office. . . ." (Complaint at 13-14). It is this language on which the plaintiff relies for his disclaimer argument. As a general matter, "the plaintiff \[is\] the master of the claim. . . ." Caterpillar…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · January 10, 2023 · in the opinion
Wilgenbusch v. Metalclad Insulation LLC (2023)
…has held that comparative fault principles apply when apportioning liability between a strictly liable party and a negligent party. (See e.g., Daly v. General Motors Corp. (1978) 20 Cal.3d 725, 736-737; Safeway Stores…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · February 15, 2008 · in the opinion
Whitlock v. Foster Wheeler, LLC (2008)
…Atlantic Richfield Co. (2001) 25 Cal.4th 826, 859 \["\[A\]s a general matter, orders granting a new trial are examined for abuse of discretion."\].) (Italics added.) Further, as "\[t\]he standard for review of an…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Kentucky · October 26, 2017 · in the opinion
Surita v. Arvinmeritor, Inc. (2017)
…supplies to support the 82nd and 101st Airborne Divisions. \[Id. at 100:8-16.\] She was also responsible for general maintenance of her truck and trailers, including changing flat tires and working on the brakes. \[Id…
-
Court case · Rhode Island Superior Court · June 13, 2013 · in the opinion
Sweredoski v. Alfa Laval, Inc. (2013)
…product; (2) on a regular basis; (3) over an extended period of time; and (4) in proximity to where the plaintiff actually worked." Chavers v. General Motors Corp., 79 S.W.3d 361, 368 (Ark. 2002)…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · September 1, 2009 · in the opinion
Walmach v. Wheeler (2009)
…probability that in the absence of the error, a result more favorable to the appealing party would have been reached." (Soule v. General Motors Corp. (1994) 8 Cal.4th 548, 574.) We Do Not Reach the…