No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

434 results for “General Electric”, page 16 of 22

  1. Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · April 24, 2018 · in the opinion

    Jarrett v. Consol. Rail Corp. (2018)

    …Accordingly, Jarrett argues that her claim should have gone before a jury for a determination as to whether lung cancer was a "known risk" and/or whether the release was unenforceable as a general boilerplate release…

  2. Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · August 25, 2005 · in the opinion

    Summers v. Certainteed Corp. (2005)

    …is highly practical. Therefore, this decision is applicable only to asbestos-related cases and not to summary judgment cases in general. ¶ 5 Essentially, plaintiffs ask this Court en banc to overrule the panel decision in Quate…

  3. Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · May 9, 1991 · in the opinion

    Wehmeier v. Unr Industries, Inc. (1991)

    …OSHA) and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Solomon stated it was his general impression that the level of asbestos used at UNARCO's Bloomington plant was not safe. Solomon stated he never saw chrysotile asbestos ground…

  4. Court case · Montana Workers' Comp. Court · December 31, 2013 · in the opinion

    Peterson v. Liberty NW Ins. Corp. (2013)

    … however, after moving to Libby he practiced more general medicine.\[92\] Dr. Black started the CARD clinic in July 2000\[93\] to meet the needs of the public once it became evident there was a community…

  5. Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · September 8, 1993 · in the opinion

    Keene Corp. v. Rogers (1993)

    …Keene does not dispute that Alabama law should control the case in general but it contends that since the appellees did not prove and the trial court did not judicially notice any Alabama law on this…

  6. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit · August 13, 1982 · in the opinion

    Neubauer v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1982)

    …to his health. We thus regard Wisconsin Natural Gas to be an exceptional application of the more general rule that the cause of action accrues when the asbestos-caused disease becomes diagnosable — e.g., provable by…

  7. Court case · Tennessee Court of Appeals · May 16, 2014 · in the opinion

    Blackmon v. Illinois Central Railroad Company (2014)

    …In Babbitt, 104 F.3d at 90-91, the plaintiff employees had executed general releases as part of the railroad's early retirement program, releasing the railroad from any claims "of any kind whatsoever, known or…

  8. Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Illinois · August 31, 2015 · in the opinion

    Bell v. Abb Group, Inc. (2015)

    …person's expertise. Generalized knowledge of a particular subject will not necessarily enable an expert to testify as to a specific subset of the general field of the expert's knowledge. Martinez v. Sakurai Graphic Sys…

  9. Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · June 30, 2011 · in the opinion

    Union Carbide Corporation v. Synatzske (2011)

    …effect, it cannot be granted thereafter. A like general rule is that if a right to recover depends entirely upon a statute, its repeal deprives the court of jurisdiction over the subject matter. 135 Tex. 95…

  10. Court case · California Court of Appeal · March 20, 1984 · in the opinion

    JT Thorp, Inc. v. Workers'comp. Appeals BD. (1984)

    …had progressed, but doctors decided against attempting surgery. Butler remains in general good health and bicycles daily. The sole medical opinion concluded that Butler was not disabled as of the time of the opinion, but annual…

  11. Court case · New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division · July 22, 1988 · in the opinion

    Millison v. EI du Pont de Nemours (1988)

    …Ed. 610, 617 (1939); U.S. v. Trotter, 529, F.2d 806 (3d Cir.1976); State v. General Restoration Co., 42 N.J. 366, 375 (1964); State v. Sherwin, 127 N.J. Super. 370 (App.Div…

  12. Court case · Florida District Court of Appeal · February 5, 1985 · in the opinion

    Meehan v. Celotex Corp. (1985)

    …of the negligent act. Indeed, as Gaboury itself says: "In determining the proper forum in which to bring suit under the general statute fixing venue where the cause of action \arose', or \accrued', the \injury occurred…

  13. Court case · Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court · May 25, 1972 · in the opinion

    Bambrick v. Asten Hill Mfg. Co. et al. (1972)

    …he meant asbestosis when he said asbestos exposure, as well as exceed our judicial prerogative. The General Assembly has limited recovery to death caused by asbestosis, not asbestos exposure. There is insufficient evidence upon which to…

  14. Court case · U.S. Bankruptcy Court, Southern District of New York · December 10, 1992 · in the opinion

    In re Prudential Lines, Inc. (1992)

    …however, that Asbestosis Claimants' position misconstrues the general rules of insurance law and contractual interpretation applicable here. At the most basic level, the P & I policies that PLI purchased were yearly contracts for indemnification for losses…

  15. Court case · Montana Workers' Comp. Court · September 26, 2018 · in the opinion

    Atchley v. Louisiana Pacific Corp. (2018)

    …part, as follows: Once LA-contaminated soil is removed from properties \[in Libby\], various types of fill materials are used to backfill excavated areas. In general, fill materials consist of topsoil and topsoil amendments, common fill…

  16. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · February 20, 2024 · in the opinion

    Wilson v. Ham (2024)

    …Warden Fleischman and Sheriff Smith are responsible because they have not prevented the problems at the jail despite his grievance complaints. An inmates "challenge to a condition of confinement is a challenge to \general conditions, practices…

  17. Court case · Maryland Court of Appeals · April 7, 1992 · in the opinion

    Owens-Illinois, Inc. v. Armstrong (1992)

    …283 Md. 296, 327, 389 A.2d 887, 905 (1978). Causation is a necessary element of any strict liability action. Phipps v. General Motors Corp., 278 Md. 337, 344, 363 A.2d 955, 958 (1976). In…

  18. Court case · Ohio Court of Appeals · September 18, 2003 · in the opinion

    Anderson v. AC & S., Inc. (2003)

    …the suit, but subsequent to the injuries, the plaintiff executed a general release freeing the railroad from liability for the injuries sustained in the accident in exchange for two hundred and fifty dollars. Callen, 332 U…

  19. Court case · California Court of Appeal · May 26, 1998 · in the opinion

    Gutierrez v. Cassiar Mining Corp. (1998)

    …fault, warnings Cassiar placed on its product, general knowledge by asbestos workers (by the early 1970's) of asbestos exposure risks, and preexisting lung conditions caused by Gutierrez having smoked and had exposure to tuberculosis (TB)…

  20. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit · March 23, 1984 · in the opinion

    Adams v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp. (1984)

    …a "less desirable longshoreman" in the future. Id. at 668. Bonura is inapposite to the case at bar. Bonura was decided under general maritime law, not Louisiana law. Furthermore, the instant record does not support an…