No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

327 results for “General Electric”, page 16 of 17

  1. Court case · Pennsylvania Supreme Court · July 21, 2010 · in the opinion

    Summers v. Certainteed Corp. (2010)

    …breath. In so finding, Dr. Gelfand noted that, while the obstructive lung condition due to smoking showed "some improvement," in general, the reduction in lung diffusion remained severe. See Report of Dr. Gelfand concerning Frederick Summers…

  2. Court case · New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division · March 5, 2019 · in the opinion

    Rebbeck v. Honeywell International, Inc. (2019)

    …s\] . . . and the general public." The parties conducted limited discovery, including the depositions of plaintiffs before they died. Honeywell then filed motions to dismiss based on the doctrine of forum non conveniens. The parties submitted voluminous…

  3. Court case · Oregon Court of Appeals · March 24, 2021 · in the opinion

    Laux v. Akebono Brake Corp. (2021)

    …in this time. "Now, were those just introduced in the general marketplace at this time or is there a specific source of information to indicate that Yamaha introduced asbestos-free friction materials in the 1970s? "A…

  4. Court case · Ohio Court of Appeals · August 12, 2010 · in the opinion

    Connell v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. (2010)

    …objects to the purported admission of answers to interrogatories of General Motors Corporation. Appellee did not offer into evidence, and the trial judge did not allow into evidence, any answers to interrogatories of General Motors Corporation…

  5. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · January 21, 2020 · in the opinion

    Michel v. Ford Motor Company (2020)

    …slightly weighs this factor in favor of allowing the amendment. Next, the Court considers the importance of the amendment. In general, under Louisiana law, the owner or operator of a facility has the duty of exercising…

  6. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · December 4, 2013 · in the opinion

    Perry v. AW Chesterton, Inc. (2013)

    …U.S. at 611, 47 S.Ct. 207. Congress had bestowed upon the Interstate Commerce Commission the "general" power (which now rests with the Secretary of Transportation, see Kurns, 132 S.Ct. at 1266 n. 3…

  7. Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington · May 28, 2019 · in the opinion

    Jack v. Dco, LLC (2019)

    …both companies. (Id.) C. The Jury's Verdict The court provided the jury a general verdict form on which the jury was asked whether Plaintiffs proved their strict liability design defect, strict liability failure-to-warn…

  8. Court case · New York Supreme Court · February 6, 2020 · in the opinion

    Schrank v. Amchem Prods., Inc. (2020)

    …increased risk for lung cancer among vehicle mechanics. This is with the caveat that since smoking rates amongst vehicle mechanics are much higher compared to the general population, studies that do no account for the effect…

  9. Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington · September 17, 2018 · in the opinion

    Jack v. Borg-Warner Morse Tec, LLC (2018)

    …and consortium. Id. \[25\] The Green court recognized a narrow exception to the general rule against recovery for premarital injuries in toxic exposure cases, where the injured spouse does not or cannot know of the injury…

  10. Court case · New York Supreme Court · December 3, 2013 · in the opinion

    Barawa v. Acker Drill Co. (2013)

    …to warn against asbestos-containing products that were manufactured by third-party suppliers. While in general the court will not even consider arguments made for the first time in reply papers, Azzopardi v American Blower Corp.…

  11. Court case · California Court of Appeal · May 24, 2024 · in the opinion

    Perez v. Century Indemnity Co. (2024)

    …its van or stepped inside. We agree with plaintiffs that the brakes remained in Universal's possession as they lay untouched in the back of its van. (See General Casualty Co. of America v. Azteca Films…

  12. Court case · New York Supreme Court · December 14, 2018 · in the opinion

    Rothlein v. Johnson & Johnson (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2018)

    …Co., 294 A.D. 2d 900, 741 N.Y.S. 2d 803 \[4th Dept. 2002\], CPLR § 2001 and Status General Development, Inc. v. 501 Broadway Partners, LLC, 163 A.D. 3d 740, 82 N.Y.S…

  13. Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of Ohio · December 13, 2017 · in the opinion

    Alexander v. Honeywell International, Inc. (2017)

    …are deemed to have been waived, and \[the Sixth Circuit\] will review such objections only to avoid a gross miscarriage of justice. Wiley at 226 (citations omitted). As a general matter, the district judge considering a…

  14. Court case · California Court of Appeal · March 15, 2016 · in the opinion

    DePREE v. BASF Catalysts LLC (2016)

    …auto body filler from Grand Auto, and it came in cans bearing the name "Bondo." Although Mr. DePree testified in general terms about his work involving Bondo, with one exception, he was unable to recall the…

  15. Court case · California Court of Appeal · November 6, 2020 · in the opinion

    Barr v. Parker-Hannifin Corp. (2020)

    …brought this asbestos fiber home on his clothing and person. Mezei based this testimony solely on Kleinberg's job title of welder and the general epidemiological literature showing increased rates of mesothelioma among shipyard welders. However…

  16. Court case · Ohio Court of Appeals · August 6, 2020 · in the opinion

    Maddy v. Honeywell Internatl., Inc. (2020)

    …tasks those employees regularly performed. Bonded Brake Program {¶ 23} To assist Flxible in starting a bonded brake business, Flxible's parent corporation, General Automotive Corporation, acquired a brake company located in Jackson, Michigan. At that time…

  17. Court case · California Court of Appeal · April 25, 2022 · in the opinion

    Hahn v. New York Air Brake LLC (2022)

    …focus is on the facts that the plaintiff knew, not on whether the plaintiff subjectively knew she had a cause of action based on those facts. (General Motors Corp. v. Superior Court (1996) 48 Cal.App…

  18. Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · May 11, 2023 · in the opinion

    LaFever v. Ford Motor Company (2023)

    …merely indicated that defendant's request No. 29 (and the other remaining requests in defendant's general motion in limine) was "PASSED." ¶ 8 Toward the end of April and into the early part of May 2018…

  19. Court case · New York Supreme Court · April 10, 2019 · in the opinion

    Mercatante v. PACCAR (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2019)

    …any admissible evidence of causation, and that plaintiffs' expert reports do not establish either general or specific causation. A defendant cannot obtain summary judgment simply by "pointing to gaps in plaintiffs' proof" (Ricci v. A.O…

  20. Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Kentucky · May 12, 2020 · in the opinion

    Papineau v. Brake Supply Company (2020)

    …service can be effectuated by "following state law for serving a summons in an action brought in courts of general jurisdiction in the state where the district court is located or where service is made." FED…