No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

364 results for “General Electric”, page 17 of 19

  1. Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · February 20, 2008 · in the opinion

    Thibodeaux v. Asbestos Corp. Ltd. (2008)

    …trial, district court entered a judgment on the jury verdict for the vessel owner, but granted the widow's motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict (JNOV) and awarded general and special damages. The vessel owner appealed…

  2. Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · September 9, 2008 · in the opinion

    Spillman v. Anco Insulations, Inc. (2008)

    …Roggli testified that an examination of a lung tissue sample from Mr. Spillman confirmed that he was exposed to asbestos at a rate much higher than that of the general background population. \[3\] La. C.C…

  3. Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · August 25, 1998 · in the opinion

    Breaux v. Mine Safety Appliances Co. (1998)

    …Civ. C. arts. 3071-3083 govern the contract of transaction or compromise. These special rules do not modify or depart from the general principles concerning the object of contracts. La.C.C. arts. 1915, 1916. A…

  4. Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · October 3, 2003 · in the opinion

    Hughes v. Olin Corporation (2003)

    …225] The doctrine of contra non valentem agere nulla currit praescriptio acts as an exception to the general rules of prescription by suspending the running of prescription when the circumstances of the case fall into one…

  5. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · May 22, 2017 · in the opinion

    Smith v. Georgia-Pacific, LLC (2017)

    …Ltd.; BayerCropscience Inc.; Beazer East, Inc; Bird Incorporated; OneBeacon American Insurance Company; Houston General Insurance Company; The Stonewall Insurance Company; First State Insurance Company; American Insurance Company; Home Insurance Company; United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company…

  6. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · May 8, 2020 · in the opinion

    Hernandez v. Huntington Ingalls, Inc. (2020)

    …2002). The Court must consider if "the plaintiff has any law (statutory, jurisprudential, or arising from the general principles of fault) to support that the defendant owed him a duty." Lemann v. Essen Lane Daiquiris, Inc.…

  7. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit · February 24, 2020 · in the opinion

    Latiolais v. Huntington Ingalls, Incorporated (2020)

    …prosecution." This reading is also unpersuasive. To start, the canon against surplusage yields to context as it expresses courts' "general \reluctan\[ce\] to treat statutory terms as surplusage.'" Bd. of Trs. of Leland Stanford Junior Univ…

  8. Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · October 21, 2009 · in the opinion

    DiBenedetto v. Noble Drilling Company (2009)

    …article 1671 mandates that a judgment dismissing a defendant, at plaintiff's request, prior to a general appearance by that defendant must be without prejudice. We disagree with CTS's interpretation of La. C.C.P…

  9. Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · May 8, 2009 · in the opinion

    Rando v. Anco Insulations, Inc. (2009)

    …has been destroyed, lost, or stolen. Article 1832 is an exception to the general rule that when an obligation is based on a writing, prima facie proof of the obligation requires introducing that writing. See Ascension…

  10. Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · November 6, 2019 · in the opinion

    Lee v. American Supply Co. (2019)

    …could be inflammatory or malignant." He was treated for diverticulitis. On February 18, 2008, he was admitted to Lafayette General Medical Center where he underwent an exploratory laparotomy. A small bowel carcinoid tumor was removed. Seeding…

  11. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · June 13, 2022 · in the opinion

    Becnel v. Lamorak Insurance Company (2022)

    …judgment is disfavored when issues of intent or state of mind are involved, plaintiffs fail to consider that this is a general rule. The rule does not preclude this Court from evaluating the merits of such…

  12. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · April 3, 2024 · in the opinion

    Hotard v. Avondale Industries, Inc. (2024)

    …F.2d 1078, 1081 (5th Cir. 1984) ("Long-established general principles of interpreting indemnity agreements require that indemnification for an indemnitee's own negligence be clearly and unequivocally expressed."); see also Donahue v. Republic Nat'l…

  13. Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · November 9, 2001 · in the opinion

    Emery v. Owens-Corporation (2001)

    …suitable references to plaintiff's closing argument), we issue a precautionary warning that the general reference to "witnesses" in its admissibility assertion skirts the outer perimeter of Rule 2-12.4. \[9\] See La. Acts 1979…

  14. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · March 27, 2023 · in the opinion

    Ragusa v. Louisiana Guaranty Insurance Association (2023)

    …2007)). So, although the Fifth Circuit has made clear that the "general rule" is to decline to exercise jurisdiction over state law claims after all federal claims are eliminated from a case, this rule is "neither…

  15. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · January 21, 2020 · in the opinion

    Michel v. Ford Motor Company (2020)

    …slightly weighs this factor in favor of allowing the amendment. Next, the Court considers the importance of the amendment. In general, under Louisiana law, the owner or operator of a facility has the duty of exercising…

  16. Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · April 22, 1998 · in the opinion

    Rareshide v. Mobil Oil Corp. (1998)

    …attack. Dr. Gary Menszer, a board-certified cardiologist, admitted the claimant to East Jefferson General Hospital in August, 1995, following his heart attack. After performing a balloon angioplasty of the circumflex for this heart attack, Dr…

  17. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · May 21, 2015 · in the opinion

    Wilde v. Huntington Ingalls Inc. (2015)

    …Inc., 989 F.3d 812, 815 (5th Cir. 1993). As a general matter, the removal statute is to be construed narrowly and in favor of remand to state court. See Shamrock Oil & Gas Corp. v. Sheets…

  18. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · May 27, 2020 · in the opinion

    Broussard v. Huntington Ingalls, Inc. (2020)

    …2018). In general, a civil action must be removed within 30 days of the defendant's receipt of a copy of the initial pleading "setting forth the claim for relief upon which such action or proceeding…

  19. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · May 11, 2022 · in the opinion

    Cortez v. Lamorak Insurance Company (2022)

    …., based upon policies of insurance, included but not limited to, employers' liability, commercial general liability insurance policies and/or excess liability insurance policies sold by Lamorak Insurance Company to Eagle, Inc. . . ."\[24\] This new allegation arises…

  20. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · September 23, 2014 · in the opinion

    Humphries v. OneBEACON America Insurance Company (2014)

    …1969)). "That nexus is established by the federal officer's direct and detailed control over the defendant. If a corporation only establishes that the acts occurred under the general auspices of federal direction, however, then it…