425 results for “General Electric”, page 17 of 22
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · April 18, 2016 · in the opinion
DePriest v. Crane Co. (Matter of New York City Asbestos Litig., 2016)
…Here, the evidence that plaintiffs' medical experts intend to submit has the potential to sufficiently establish a general connection between asbestos and mesothelioma, as well as a scientific expression of plaintiffs' exposure levels based on Stagnito…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · August 5, 2014 · in the opinion
Lamberty v. AO Smith Water Prods. Co. (2014)
…percent sure. It was either — he came in on the entry level. It would be either power plant helper or assistant general mechanic. I'm not exactly sure which one. Q So he worked under you?…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · July 10, 2007 · in the opinion
IN Matter of New York City Asbestos Litigation (2007)
…NY2d 955 \[1997\]), which held that general awareness of the risk of injury to persons exposed to asbestos without the opportunity to warn was insufficient to establish recklessness. Defendant argues that the same rule applies to…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division · March 5, 1996 · in the opinion
Dollas v. WR Grace & Co. (1996)
…that Monokote was not used on The Constellation in the face of unequivocal testimony that it was. A court may only apply judicial notice to matters "of common and general knowledge, well established and authoritatively settled…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · August 6, 2015 · in the opinion
Galasso v. BF Goodrich (Matter of New York City Asbestos Litig., 2015)
…affidavit of Joan M. Taffi, a Goodrich Corporation employee, does not contain any specificity beyond the general claim that "\[p\]rior to 1964, B.F. Goodrich Company produced and sold asbestos floor tile, as well as…
-
Court case · New York Court of Appeals · November 27, 2018 · in the opinion
Juni v. Ford Motor Co. (Matter of New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2018)
…evidence, a connection between defendant Ford Motor Company's products and decedent's exposure to asbestos. I do not address any other issues of general or specific causation reached by the Appellate Division. [\1119] Wilson, J…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · May 17, 2013 · in the opinion
Finerty v. Abex Corp. (2013)
…if proven, would be sufficient to demonstrate that the exercise of personal jurisdiction would be proper under either New York's general jurisdiction statute (CPLR 301) or New York's long-arm statute (CPLR 302), and…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · February 22, 2016 · in the opinion
Bartolone v. Union Carbide Corp. (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2016)
…a Union Carbide product or provide a "scientific expression" of an exposure level. Dr. Moline cannot establish general or specific causation, defendant argues, where the product cannot be identified. PLAINTIFF'S ARGUMENTS Plaintiff argues that Campanella…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · January 13, 2020 · in the opinion
Jackson v. Henry Co. (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2020)
…4 at 29:25-30:4). Plaintiffs then go on to show that in Henry's general catalog and Henry's commercial products catalog, it states that Henry did produce and manufacture asbestos-containing plastic roof…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · January 21, 2021 · in the opinion
Johnson v. Aerco Intl., Inc. (2021)
…exposure to a toxin; (2) that the toxin is capable of causing the particular illness, or "general causation"; and (3) that plaintiff was exposed to sufficient levels of the toxin to cause the illness, or "specific…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division · August 4, 2016 · in the opinion
North v. National Grid Generation (IN the Matter of New York City Asbestos Litig., 2016)
…46 AD3d 268 \[1st Dept 2007\]). The clause in the contract between LILCO and O'Connor (which predates the enactment of General Obligations Law § 5-322.1) provided for indemnification of LILCO by O'Connor for…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · March 15, 2023 · in the opinion
Seen v. Kaiser Gypsum Co., Inc. (2023)
…to a toxin, that the toxin is capable of causing the particular illness (general causation) and that plaintiff was exposed to sufficient levels of the toxin to cause the illness (specific causation)." Nemeth II, 38 N…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · June 17, 2013 · in the opinion
Logan v. AP Moller-Maersk, Inc. (2013)
…warn Mr. Logan of the dangers associated with Calidria because it provided adequate warnings to GP. Plaintiffs submit that apart from special orders and test shipments which were not available to the general public, all asbestos…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · September 9, 2019 · in the opinion
Hardman v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2019)
…the remaining parties in this action, the County Clerk, and the Trial Support Clerk in the General Clerk's Office who shall mark their records accordingly, and it is further, ORDERED, that Bristol-Myers Squibb Co…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · June 26, 2018 · in the opinion
Botta v. AERCO Int'l (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2018)
…1st Dept. 1984\]). Mass toxic tort cases, including asbestos cases, may be consolidated if they meet the requirements of the general rule governing consolidation of cases (In re Asbestos Litigation, 173 F.R.D. 81, 38…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · September 23, 2019 · in the opinion
Rothlein v. American Int'l Indus. (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2019)
…451 NE2d 195 \[1983\]). There are four exceptions to New York's general rule on successor liability, as the successor may be "held liable for the torts of its predecessor if (1) it expressly or impliedly…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · January 8, 2020 · in the opinion
Germain v. Whittaker Clark & Daniels (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2020)
…of this Order with Notice of Entry pursuant to NYSCEF e-filing protocol on the remaining parties, the General Clerk's Office and the County Clerk's Office, who are directed to mark their records accordingly…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · September 19, 2018 · in the opinion
Watts v. A & J Plumbing & Heating Corp. (2018)
…1985 APA in existence before the closing date. The RAL Corporation, RAL Leasing & Credit Corporation and RAL Plumbing and Heating Supply, Inc. retained their product liability and comprehensive general liability insurance policies (Mot. Exh. 5, para. …
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York · November 30, 2020 · in the opinion
Phelps v. CBS Corporation (2020)
…Plaintiff may offer evidence to establish facts upon which Mr. Paskal relies, including video testimony from Grimes and general testimony from the Plaintiff's Naval Expert, Mr. Paskal's opinions cannot be excluded at this stage…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · June 4, 2019 · in the opinion
Alleyne v. Revlon (Matter of New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2019)
…as an expert, but only made general references to his testimony and does not specifically identify which materials he is going to rely on. On January 18, 2019 a trial readiness conference was held by Special…