No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

378 results for “General Electric”, page 17 of 19

  1. Court case · California Court of Appeal · July 22, 2008 · in the opinion

    Behshid v. Bondex International, Inc. (2008)

    …in sanding the tiles. Also, there was no evidence of a general nature. There was no evidence as to what type of tiles would have been used in Iran 35 years ago. There was no evidence…

  2. Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · December 13, 2014 · in the opinion

    Robertson v. Doug Ashy Building Materials, Inc. (2014)

    …to the trial court, Dr. Mark's testimony simply "does not carry the day" because it is of a general nature, and because plaintiffs did not have any evidence of specific causation, the court could not…

  3. Court case · California Court of Appeal · May 22, 2020 · in the opinion

    Kramer v. Amcord Inc. (2020)

    …testified that gem and diamond cutter was an alternative title under the general "stonecutter" category and, further, that a vocational rehabilitation expert had confirmed that the general "stonecutter" category was in fact the correct one for…

  4. Court case · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · March 6, 1997 · in the opinion

    Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. v. Henkel (1997)

    …was rendered untimely by the enactment of Section 12-311. OCF acknowledges that "the general purpose underlying Section 12-311 was to expand the period of time in which plaintiffs could sue to recover for asbestos…

  5. Court case · Tennessee Supreme Court · March 1, 2001 · in the opinion

    Mackie v. Young Sales Corp. (2001)

    …related injury has resulted in the employee's death, workers' compensation benefits are to be paid to the surviving dependents of the employee. Jones v. General Accident Ins. Co. of America, 856 S.W.2d 133…

  6. Court case · California Court of Appeal · August 4, 1999 · in the opinion

    Ehret v. Congoleum Corp. (1999)

    …pp. 371-372.) There is insufficient basis for deviating from this general rule in the current posture of this case, particularly where to do so would require the taking of evidence. \[4\] Congoleum also appeals from…

  7. Court case · Rhode Island Superior Court · March 29, 2010 · in the opinion

    Asbury v. AW Chesterton Company (2010)

    …Forum Non Conveniens 1 Standard of Review The doctrine of forum non conveniens allows "a court \[to\] resist imposition upon its jurisdiction even when jurisdiction is authorized by the letter of a general venue statute." Kedy…

  8. Court case · Florida District Court of Appeal · August 12, 1987 · in the opinion

    Wood v. Harry Harmon Insulation (1987)

    …usual occupations; (4) if the disease is an ordinary disease of life, the incidence of such a disease must be substantially higher in the particular occupation than in the general public. Hamilton v. Stamas Yachts, 496…

  9. Court case · New York Supreme Court · July 24, 2015 · in the opinion

    Best v. The William Powell Co. (Matter of New York City Asbestos Litig., 2015)

    …engine, pumps, valves, steam traps, and turbines, and general cleanup. After he left the Navy, Best performed brake jobs on vehicles using asbestos-containing brakes. (NYSCEF 95). Defendants remaining in his action are Carrier Corporation, Goulds…

  10. Court case · California Court of Appeal · April 18, 2013 · in the opinion

    Hernandez v. Amcord, Inc. (2013)

    …appellant presented Richard Lemen, Ph.D., an epidemiologist, former assistant surgeon general of the United States, and former deputy [\666] director of the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH). Dr. Lemen described epidemiology as…

  11. Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · October 3, 2003 · in the opinion

    Hughes v. Olin Corporation (2003)

    …225] The doctrine of contra non valentem agere nulla currit praescriptio acts as an exception to the general rules of prescription by suspending the running of prescription when the circumstances of the case fall into one…

  12. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · May 22, 2017 · in the opinion

    Smith v. Georgia-Pacific, LLC (2017)

    …Ltd.; BayerCropscience Inc.; Beazer East, Inc; Bird Incorporated; OneBeacon American Insurance Company; Houston General Insurance Company; The Stonewall Insurance Company; First State Insurance Company; American Insurance Company; Home Insurance Company; United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company…

  13. Court case · California Court of Appeal · January 27, 2021 · in the opinion

    Morgan v. JM Manufacturing Co., Inc. (2021)

    …litigant to rely on abstract generalities, but must instruct in specific terms that relate the party's [\1088] theory to the particular case." (Soule v. General Motors Corp. (1994) 8 Cal.4th 548, 572 \[34 Cal…

  14. Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · December 7, 2021 · in the opinion

    Jones v. Pneumo Abex LLC (2021)

    …marks omitted.) Id. In contrast, a defendant who understands the general objectives of a conspiratorial scheme and agrees to do its part to further those objectives is liable as a conspirator. Id. ¶ 13 Because a conspiracy…

  15. Court case · California Court of Appeal · December 14, 2006 · in the opinion

    Quarles v. Advocate Mines Limited (2006)

    …specialist in occupational medicine called by Quarles, testified not about any specific facts of this case, but about the evolving general state of knowledge in medicine, science and industry, and about the dangers of asbestos in…

  16. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit · August 28, 1995 · in the opinion

    Consorti v. Armstrong World Industries, Inc. (1995)

    …s fees to fight asbestos litigation cases." The district court ruled that any well-informed citizen could possess general knowledge about Johns-Manville and that the report from the juror was not prejudicial to the defendants…

  17. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · January 26, 2017 · in the opinion

    National Fire Insurance Company OF Hartford v. Burns & Scalo Roofing Company (2017)

    …the state court matter, Defendant sought a defense and indemnification from Plaintiffs consistent with the provisions of the general liability insurance occurrence policies issued to Defendant between the years 1988 and 1992 ("the Policies"). (See Pltfs…

  18. Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · May 11, 1998 · in the opinion

    McCauley v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1998)

    …wages. \[4\] In Simmons, the supreme court noted a limited exception to the general rule that a plaintiff does not have a viable cause of action for asymptomatic pleural thickening. This exception recognizes that a plaintiff…

  19. Court case · New York Supreme Court · July 31, 2019 · in the opinion

    Carlstrand v. Domco Prods. of Texas (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2019)

    …judgment on plaintiffs' claim for punitive damages. Defendant contends that plaintiffs failed to proffer any expert opinion or other evidence establishing general and specific causation that any of its Azrock vinyl asbestos floor products caused Mr…

  20. Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York · October 19, 2016 · in the opinion

    Holzworth v. Alfa Laval Inc. (2016)

    …14-650:11, Aug. 8, 2012). He also swept up the debris from the heater, although he acknowledged it was mixed with the general mess from the fire. (See id. 650:3-11, Aug. 8, 2012)…