532 results for “General Electric”, page 17 of 27
-
Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · December 20, 2006 · in the opinion
Chaisson v. Avondale Industries, Inc. (2006)
Accordingly, we hold that Zachry breached its general duty, under the facts and circumstances of this case, to Mrs. Chaisson by putting her in foreseeable risk [\190] of contracting an asbestos related disease from household exposure…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington · June 4, 2018 · in the opinion
Barabin v. Scapa Dryer Fabrics, Inc. (2018)
at 4-5.) To the extent that this argument overlaps with Scapa's more general argument regarding causation, the court will address the issue in the following section. See infra § III.B.3; (see JMOL Mot…
-
Court case · Delaware Supreme Court · July 22, 2019 · in the opinion
Richards v. Copes-Vulcan, Inc. (2019)
51, 51-52 (2008) ("Beyond general and specific causation, an additional causation issue arises when multiple defendants are responsible for exposing the plaintiff to a harmful substance. The most common example is a plaintiff who contracts…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · October 18, 2011 · in the opinion
Fontes v. Interstate Brands Corporation (2011)
…also D'Amico v. Board of Medical Examiners (1974) 11 Cal.3d 1, 21-22.) The Fonteses' General Rule 29 Case Report, General Rule 13 response to interrogatory number 26, and Mr. Fontes's deposition testimony…
-
Court case · Tennessee Supreme Court · January 4, 2021 · in the opinion
Coffman v. Armstrong International, Inc. (2021)
There the canon avoids not contradiction but the superfluity of a specific provision that is swallowed by the general one, "violat\[ing\] the cardinal rule that, if possible, effect shall be given to every clause and…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of Louisiana · May 19, 2020
McAllister v. McDERMOTT, Inc. (2020)
…McAllister plaintiffs' damages claims, but limited recovery of loss of income and household services to the surviving spouse as executrix of the estate. Under general maritime law and the Jones Act, a decedent's pre-death…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Connecticut · September 18, 2008 · in the opinion
Pantalone v. Aurora Pump Co. (2008)
…and which were purportedly critical to the removal determination), Buffalo Pumps instead proffered its factual basis for removal in broad, general terms. According to the notice, Buffalo Pumps had satisfied the statutory requirements for removal during…
-
Court case · Delaware Superior Court · November 16, 2011 · in the opinion
Gordon v. Dana Companies (In re Asbestos Litigation, 2011)
Jun. 9, 2011) (TRANSCRIPT). \[27\] See, e.g., Chavers v. General Motors Corp., 79 S.W.3d 361, 368 (Ark. 2002). \[28\] In re: Asbestos Litig. (Bowser), C.A. No. N10C-05-104 ASB (Jun. 3…
-
Court case · Florida Supreme Court · October 15, 2018 · in the opinion
DeLisle v. Crane Co. (2018)
…in every proceeding. However, this Court's case law makes clear that a proper and thorough application of Frye allows the trial judge to inquire [\1235] beyond bare assertions of general acceptance. Daubert, on the other…
-
Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · August 26, 2010 · in the opinion
Georgia-Pacific Corporation v. Bostic (2010)
Maddox's opinion is insufficient as to specific causation. Id. at 839. Here, appellees endeavor to rely on material practice simulation studies performed by their general causation expert, William Longo, Ph.D., a material scientist. Dr…
-
Court case · Kentucky Court of Appeals · April 1, 2005 · in the opinion
Parker v. Henry A. Petter Supply Co. (2005)
…Mine and Mill Supply's liability and that Parker could have pursued IRECO as a defendant. The general rule regarding liability of a corporate successor in Kentucky is that a purchasing corporation does not assume liability…
-
Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · June 18, 2020
Andrews v. John Crane, Inc. (2020)
…and remanded for further proceedings. General maritime law preempts state law for a Navy sailor's asbestos products claims against a gasket maker, and DOHSA does not bar a general maritime survival recovery for the decedent…
-
Court case · Indiana Court of Appeals · January 28, 2004
Psi Energy, Inc. v. Roberts (2004)
…and the landowner should have anticipated the harm, including where it saw workers going unprotected. A general verdict stands if the evidence supports any one theory of liability. Premises Owner Liability; Fault, Apportionment and Settlement Credits…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · October 24, 2019
Evans v. John Crane, Inc. (2019)
…overruled its objections to the magistrate judge's ruling that plaintiff's Navy procurement expert was qualified. General maritime law and state survival statutes can supply survival damages where an asbestos injury is indivisible across the…
-
Court case · Oklahoma Court of Civil Appeals · March 28, 2007
Zinc Corp. OF America v. Reeder (2007)
…s workers' compensation statute applies only to silicosis and asbestosis, not mesothelioma, so the general last-injurious-exposure rule applies, under which the last employer is liable without a minimum quantity of exposure. Causation; Expert Testimony…
-
Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · March 20, 2006
Moore v. American Honda Motor Co., Inc. (2006)
…a worksite, but a jury may not be left to speculate. A general expert opinion that parts from companies "like" the defendant likely contained asbestos, with no specific link to the defendant's products, does not…
-
Court case · Indiana Court of Appeals · October 18, 2001
Jurich v. Garlock, Inc. (2001)
…not sellers of asbestos-containing products. The general ten-year repose period violates the open courts clause of Article I, Section 12 as applied to a latent asbestos disease where exposure began before the Act or…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · April 13, 2015
Juni v. Ford Motor Co. (Matter of New York City Asbestos Litig., 2015)
…which the court held control asbestos cases, plaintiffs must offer expert proof of general causation and a scientific expression of the plaintiff's exposure to the defendant's product. An unquantified 'cumulative exposure' opinion and proof…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of South Carolina · March 29, 2018
Chesher v. 3M Company (2018)
…specific causation expert testimony, the plaintiff must present evidence of the amount and duration of asbestos dust exposure, and general allegations of periodic exposure over many years are not enough. Causation; Expert Testimony; Maritime Law and…
-
Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · January 4, 2023
Shellenberger v. Kreider Farms (2023)
…Failure to Warn; Premises Owner Liability; Employer and Contractor Liability, and Workers' Compensation; Wrongful Death and Survival Worksites: Kreider Farms dairy processing plant general manager of dairy plant operations Kreider Farms dairy processing plant 1972-1980