No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

434 results for “General Electric”, page 18 of 22

  1. Court case · Maryland Court of Appeals · October 18, 1995 · in the opinion

    ACandS, Inc. v. Godwin (1995)

    …we have now evidence of the consequences of exposure, but we do not have, in general, accurate measures of the levels of exposure occurring 20 or 30 years ago, which have given rise to these consequences…

  2. Court case · North Carolina Court of Appeals · June 7, 2011 · in the opinion

    Johnson v. Covil Corporation (2011)

    …erred by failing to apply the average weekly wages in conjunction with section 97-38. "\\[I\]n discerning the intent of the General Assembly, statutes in pari materia should be construed together and harmonized whenever possible.'…

  3. Court case · California Court of Appeal · May 4, 2012 · in the opinion

    Bettencourt v. Hennessy Industries, Inc. (2012)

    …plaintiffs' injuries. I. Standard of Review A motion for judgment on the pleadings is analogous to a general demurrer. (Ludgate, supra, 82 Cal.App.4th at p. 602.) Like a general demurrer, it tests the sufficiency…

  4. Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · September 23, 2005 · in the opinion

    Adams v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (2005)

    …them for consumer use, and failing to recall or remove such products from the stream of commerce in spite of knowing of their unsafe and dangerous nature.\[6\] In addition to these general allegations, "Count Two…

  5. Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · August 11, 1998 · in the opinion

    McClure v. Owens Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1998)

    …even though both individuals deny it. In any event, plaintiffs do not rely solely upon parallel action to prove their cases. A defendant who understands the general objectives of the conspiratorial scheme, accepts them, and agrees…

  6. Court case · Indiana Supreme Court · October 26, 1982 · in the opinion

    Bunker v. National Gypsum Co. (1982)

    …validity of that limitation, this Court held: "We recognize the general rule that the legislature is the primary judge as to whether the time allowed by a statute of limitations is reasonable. Although the determination of…

  7. Court case · Michigan Court of Appeals · January 23, 1985 · in the opinion

    Larson v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp. (1985)

    …F Supp 674, fn 4. See also Jackson v Johns-Manville Sales Corp, 727 F2d 506 (CA 5, 1984). In Funk v General Motors Corp, 392 Mich 91, 104; 220 NW2d 641 (1974), the Supreme Court…

  8. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit · April 18, 2006 · in the opinion

    Conwed Corp. v. Union Carbide Corp. (2006)

    …Conwed and Union Carbide at fault for causing injuries to six of those employees, and awarded common law damages, including general disability and loss of future earning capacity. In accordance with Tyroll v. Private Label Chemicals…

  9. Court case · Illinois Supreme Court · October 21, 1999 · in the opinion

    McClure v. Owens Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1999)

    …could look beyond these problems, I still would not agree with the majority's decision. A defendant is liable as a conspirator where he understands the general objectives of the conspiratorial scheme, accepts them, and agrees…

  10. Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · June 28, 2012 · in the opinion

    Union Carbide Corp. v. Synatzske (2012)

    …effect, it cannot be granted thereafter. A like general rule is that if a right to recover depends entirely upon a statute, its repeal deprives the court of jurisdiction over the subject matter. 135 Tex. 95…

  11. Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Georgia · January 26, 1982 · in the opinion

    Starling v. Seaboard Coast Line R. Co. (1982)

    …The label, intentional tort, is merely a general descriptive term for specific types of tortious conduct which share the common element that the actor intended to injure the object of his action. Prosser, Law of Torts…

  12. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit · March 23, 1984 · in the opinion

    Jackson v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp. (1984)

    …not prove that he presently suffers from that disease. In arguing that the cancer evidence was properly admissible, Jackson relies on the general rule of tort law that allows for recovery of all harms — past, present…

  13. Court case · Pennsylvania Supreme Court · February 21, 2012 · in the opinion

    Daley v. AW Chesterton, Inc. (2012)

    …280 n. 8. Moreover, because mesothelioma, in general, is so rare, "any case occurring after a well attested and substantial asbestos exposure is commonly accepted as being caused by that exposure." Id. at 283 (footnote omitted);…

  14. Court case · Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court · March 24, 1983 · in the opinion

    Asbestos Insul. Co. v. Wcab (McGOVERN) (1983)

    …the fact that Mr. McGovern was exposed to asbestos in this short period of time that you mentioned might probably have aggravated his general pulmonary status because of being exposed to the offending agent. You see…

  15. Disease

    What is asbestosis

    …is actually reached, because it's more concrete than it sounds. The B-reader doesn't grade from memory or general impression. The ILO system supplies a set of official standard reference films, each one already…

  16. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, First Circuit · April 13, 1989 · in the opinion

    Kaiser v. Armstrong World Industries, Inc. (1989)

    …late 1985 or early 1986 that he suffered from asbestosis. The Kaisers filed this lawsuit seeking general and special damages for Kaiser's asbestos-related injuries on August 15, 1986. III. All parties accept in their…

  17. Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · August 22, 2023 · in the opinion

    Vitcavich v. Owens Corning/fibreboard Asbestos Personal Injury Trust (2023)

    …Finally, the Bankruptcy Code does not preclude all tort litigation under these circumstances, as even under a general bar to litigation a channeling injunction may still "expressly allow\[\]" for specific legal actions. 11 U.S.C…

  18. Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · July 30, 1993 · in the opinion

    Adcock v. Brakegate, Ltd. (1993)

    …under Illinois common law. However, Fahner does not represent that conclusion because it involved a statutory enforcement action brought by the Illinois Attorney General pursuant to the Illinois Antitrust Act (Ill.Rev.Stat.1975, ch. 38…

  19. Court case · West Virginia Supreme Court of Appeals · December 4, 2003 · in the opinion

    Adams v. Consolidated Rail Corp. (2003)

    …clear that the trial court has acted under some misapprehension of the law or the evidence. Syl. pt. 1, Matheny v. Fairmont General Hospital, 212 W.Va. 740, 575 S.E.2d 350 (2002); Lamphere v…

  20. Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of Alabama · February 21, 2014 · in the opinion

    McGUFFIE v. Mead Corporation (2014)

    …. ." Generally, "the affairs of CAPCO will be under the general management of the board of directors of six individuals, of whom three will always be designated by Asarco\[, despite its minority stock position\]."\[24\] The CAPCO…