547 results for “General Electric”, page 18 of 28
-
Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · September 9, 2008 · in the opinion
Taylor v. Csr Limited (2008)
…of Baltimore for sugar deliveries from which CSR derived substantial revenue. Taylor next contends that she presented evidence satisfying the due process requirements for Maryland's exercise of both specific and general personal jurisdiction over CSR…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · August 15, 2017 · in the opinion
Mayeaux v. Taylor-Seidenbach, Inc. (2017)
…or to comprehensive and detailed regulations."\[33\] Plaintiff contends that establishing that the relevant acts occurred under the "general auspices" of federal direction is insufficient to warrant removal under Section 1442(a)(1).\[34\] Plaintiff argues…
-
Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · August 11, 2010 · in the opinion
Marcel v. Delta Shipbuilding Company (2010)
…22:1269. Conversely, Continental contends that dissolution is not a purely personal defense, but rather a "general" defense akin to peremption, which can be asserted by Continental to defeat the plaintiffs' right of action. See, e…
-
Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit · April 21, 1989 · in the opinion
Smith v. US (1989)
…1\] The district court correctly rejected the contention that Mrs. Smith filed her administrative claim on August 1, 1986, when she sent it to the Office of General Counsel. See 46 C.F.R. pt. 327 …
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · March 28, 2003 · in the opinion
Ferris v. Gatke Corporation (2003)
…our opinion concluded, that "the peculiar facts presented by exposure to asbestos fiber from brake pads" made general order 21 "inapplicable to the facts of the claim stated by plaintiffs." Plaintiffs, Wheeler went on to point…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · July 13, 2022 · in the opinion
Cortez v. Lamorak Ins. Co. (2022)
…465 (5th Cir. 1991))). 473 While plaintiffs cite several pre-Davis cases that reiterate the general rule that end-users must be warned, these decisions do not address what happens when a manufacturer sells to a…
-
Court case · Florida Supreme Court · March 17, 1988 · in the opinion
Celotex Corp. v. Meehan (1988)
…allow an expansion of a statute of limitations period when the change is made before the cause of action is barred by the prior statutory limitation period. Corbett v. General Engineering & Machinery Co., 160 Fla. 879…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington · December 3, 2024 · in the opinion
Monlux v. 3M Company (2024)
…1-2, 1-3. Both versions of the complaint contain only general allegations against Foster Wheeler without identifying what specific product allegedly injured Mr. Monlux at Lockheed Shipyard. Foster Wheeler notes that both versions of the…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · June 27, 2019 · in the opinion
Schildknegt v. Air and Liquid Systems Corp. (2019)
…App.4th 246, 251-254 \[affirming summary judgment in favor of general contractor on ground plaintiff lacked evidence he was present when the general contractor's employees performed insulation work likely to release asbestos dust\]; Casey…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · January 31, 1995 · in the opinion
Lineaweaver v. Plant Insulation Co. (1995)
…914 F.2d 360, 372-373, 383.) Other cases dispense entirely with evidence of where a product was used by merely requiring proof that it was in general use at an industrial facility. Thus, Martin v…
-
Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit · April 14, 1995 · in the opinion
Kirk v. Raymark Industries, Inc. (1995)
…the petit jury venire. The Supreme Court announced a general rule that "\[t\]he denial or impairment of the right \[to exercise peremptory challenges\] is reversible error without a showing of prejudice." Swain, 380 U.S…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of Louisiana · May 8, 2014 · in the opinion
Genusa v. Asbestos Corp. Ltd. (2014)
…Accordingly, this court has held that the current version of 28 U.S.C. § 1441 allows removal of general maritime claims without requiring an additional source of federal jurisdiction. See Garza v. Phillips 66 Co., No…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York · January 21, 1994 · in the opinion
Tabolt v. Flintkote Co. (In re New York Asbestos Litigation, 1994)
…at 982 F.2d 721 (2d Cir.1992), and the publication of numerous stories in the New York Times and Wall Street Journal — any well-informed citizen could possess general knowledge about Johns Manville, c.f.…
-
Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · February 25, 1999 · in the opinion
Owens Corning v. Walatka (1999)
…For the reasons discussed below, we conclude that the general rule imposing the burden on the plaintiff should be applied in this case against appellees. A. THE BURDEN TO ESTABLISH THAT THE STATUTORY CAP DOES NOT…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York · March 11, 2025 · in the opinion
Keller v. Exxonmobil Oil Corporation (2025)
…for the proposition that, "in a Jones Act case, the plaintiff is only required to prove general exposure to asbestos aboard the employer's vessel." (Docket entry no. 54 ("Pl. Kradin Mem.") at 8-10 (emphasis…
-
Medical study · Medical research · 2004
The doctors and the dockers
…The Registrar General's occupational mortality report for 1951, noted excess tumors of the lung and stomach for dockers. Elevated Standardized Mortality Ratios for lung cancer had consistently been calculated by the Registrar General for the…
-
Court case · Pennsylvania Supreme Court · June 10, 1986 · in the opinion
Morgan v. Johns-Manville Corp. (1986)
…Inc., Rapid American, Uni-Royal, Carolina Asbestos Co., J. Franklin Burke General Asbestos Co., Ruberoid Company, Keaseey Mattison Co., Asten Hill Manufacturing Co. Argued December 17, 1985. Filed June 10, 1986. Supreme Court of Pennsylvania. [\60…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of California · September 21, 2022 · in the opinion
Darden v. Western Asbestos Settlement Trust (In re Western Asbestos Settlement Trust, 2022)
…named in a release to be included in the release. "\[T\]o obtain summary judgment on the ground that a general release has discharged him from liability, a third party to the release agreement must affirmatively…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · March 19, 2021 · in the opinion
Labarre v. Bienville Auto Parts, Inc. (2021)
…original). In Loupe v. Pennsylvania General Insurance Co., the other paper that started the clock for removal was a deposition transcript that showed the plaintiff personally worked with asbestos in the construction of federal ships. 2016…
-
Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · August 22, 1991 · in the opinion
Lilley v. Johns-Manville Corp. (1991)
…asbestosis sufferers in general and specifically by a person with Mr. Lilley's type of symptoms. Id. at 41-46. Dr. Altschuler offered no testimony regarding Mr. Lilley's psychological profile nor the general psychological characteristics…