No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

767 results for “General Electric”, page 18 of 39

  1. Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · June 26, 2014 · in the opinion

    Graver v. Foster Wheeler Corp. (2014)

    …Cigna Corp., 74 A.3d 179, 182 (Pa.Super.2013) (citation omitted). The relevant statute of repose states in part: (a) General rule. Except as provided in subsection (b), a civil action or proceeding against any…

  2. Court case · New York Supreme Court · October 11, 2013 · in the opinion

    Brown v. Bell & Gossett Co. (2013)

    …14th Street and for LILCO the Northport, who was it that told the insulators and the boilermakers and the steamfitters and the electricians and the plumbers, who was it that told all of the trades what…

  3. Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Virginia · July 19, 1984 · in the opinion

    Joyce v. AC & s., Inc. (1984)

    …asbestos insulation materials. Plaintiff, an industrial electrician who had worked with asbestos insulation from 1948 to 1972, claimed that inhalation of asbestos fibers and dust during that period had caused him to develop mesothelioma, a cancerous…

  4. Court case · Oregon Court of Appeals · February 15, 2006 · in the opinion

    Weihl v. Asbestos Corporation, Ltd. (2006)

    …in a general fashion. He then alleged that defendants were "regularly engaged in the business of manufacturing, designing, processing, marketing, distributing, applying, repairing, and/or selling products containing asbestos fiber for use in electrical products and…

  5. Court case · New York Supreme Court · January 22, 2019 · in the opinion

    Christy v. A.O. Smith Water Prods. Co. (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2019)

    …Mass toxic tort cases, including asbestos cases, may be consolidated if they meet the requirements of the general rule governing consolidation of cases (In re Asbestos Litigation, 173 F.R.D.81, 38 Fed.R.Serv…

  6. Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · March 18, 1993 · in the opinion

    Campbell v. AC Equipment Services Corporation, Inc. (1993)

    …TGM, alleged they were employed by TGM to perform work for A.C. Equipment and Springfield's City Water, Light and Power Division at an electricity generating station known as Lakeside Two. A.C. Equipment, a…

  7. Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · June 1, 2005 · in the opinion

    Owens-Illinois, Inc. v. Hunter (2005)

    …the integrity of our proper role, vis a vis, the General Assembly. We explain. Maryland's cap on noneconomic damages in personal injury or wrongful death actions is codified at Md.Code (1998 Repl.Vol.), Cts…

  8. Court case · Ohio Court of Appeals · March 1, 2013 · in the opinion

    Burkhart v. HJ Heinz Co. (2013)

    …pain, or sensations, or the inception or general character of the cause or external source thereof insofar as reasonably pertinent to diagnosis or treatment. {¶ 49} The trial court's decision here is somewhat perplexing. The letter…

  9. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit · September 4, 1991 · in the opinion

    O'brien v. National Gypsum Co. (1991)

    …any other evidence which the proponent can procure through reasonable efforts; and (C) the general purposes of these rules and the interests of justice will best be served by admission of the statement into evidence. However…

  10. Court case · New Jersey Supreme Court · April 19, 1982 · in the opinion

    Beshada v. Johns-Manville Products Corp. (1982)

    …Rather, defendants state, the cost "will be borne by the public at large and reflected in a general, across the board increase in premiums to compensate for unanticipated risks." There is some truth in this assertion…

  11. Court case · New Jersey Supreme Court · July 26, 1993 · in the opinion

    Coffman v. Keene Corp. (1993)

    …there is no common experience on which we can premise the creation of a presumption that the general public reads and heeds warnings. [\597] We can agree with defendant that the heeding presumption is not firmly…

  12. Court case · New York Supreme Court · January 18, 2019 · in the opinion

    ALBIN v. AJAX MAGNETHERMIC CORPORATION (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2019)

    …Mass toxic tort cases, including asbestos cases, may be consolidated if they meet the requirements of the general rule governing consolidation of cases (In re Asbestos Litigation, 173 F.R.D.81, 38 Fed.R.Serv…

  13. Court case · New York Supreme Court · January 17, 2019 · in the opinion

    Knudsen v. Air & Liquid Systems Corp. (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2019)

    …Mass toxic tort cases, including asbestos cases, may be consolidated if they meet the requirements of the general rule governing consolidation of cases (In re Asbestos Litigation, 173 F.R.D.81, 38 Fed.R.Serv…

  14. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · February 7, 2025 · in the opinion

    Salvemini v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2025)

    …Wrongful Death, and Loss of Consortium claims under General Maritime Law The Vessel Defendants argue that no federal court recognize a cause of action for "take-home" asbestos exposure under the Jones Act or maritime law. …

  15. Court case · Ohio Court of Appeals · November 30, 2015

    Bryant v. General Motors Corp. (2015)

    …for the jury, and an expert may rely on assumed facts that independent evidence supports. Causation; Expert Testimony; Trial Procedure and Discovery Worksites: General Motors Defiance foundry (GM Powertrain); GM Powertrain Division, Defiance facility, Defiance core…

  16. Court case · Arkansas Supreme Court · July 5, 2002

    Chavers v. General Motors Corp. (2002)

    The Arkansas Supreme Court affirmed the trial court's summary judgment for General Motors, AlliedSignal and Ford, rejecting the claims of Deidra Chavers over her husband's mesothelioma death. Arkansas adopts the 'frequency, regularity, and proximity…

  17. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · December 15, 2014 · in the opinion

    Comardelle v. Pennsylvania General Insurance Company (2014)

    MICHAEL COMARDELLE, v. PENNSYLVANIA GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY ET AL., Section I. Civil Action No. 13-6555. December 15, 2014. United States District Court, E.D. Louisiana. ORDER AND REASONS LANCE M. AFRICK, District Judge. Before the…

  18. Court case · Ohio Court of Appeals · December 5, 2005

    Snyder v. Ford Motor Co. (2005)

    …reversed the May 2005 summary judgment for Ford, General Dynamics and the Administrator, and remanded for a determination of her right to participate in the workers' compensation fund. To participate in the workers' compensation fund for…

  19. Court case · Indiana Court of Appeals · July 20, 2001 · in the opinion

    Black v. ACandS, Inc. (2001)

    …concluded that the plaintiff in McIntosh was not entitled to a remedy under Section 12 because "the General Assembly has determined that injuries occurring ten years after the product was delivered to a user are not…

  20. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit · March 22, 2016

    Savoie v. Huntington Ingalls, Incorporated (2016)

    Joseph Savoie worked at the Avondale shipyard in Louisiana from 1948 to 1996, as a clean-up laborer and a painter-blaster on Navy and Coast Guard vessels. He developed mesothelioma, allegedly from asbestos exposure on those vessels, and sued the…