3,672 results for “Owens-Corning Fiberglas”, page 18 of 184
-
Court case · Pennsylvania Supreme Court · July 21, 2010 · in the opinion
Summers v. Certainteed Corp. (2010)
Owens Corning Fiberglas Corp., 840 A.2d 1028 (Pa.Super.2004) (outlining the competing standards for establishment of a prima facie case).\[10\] The OISR then opined that Appellants, through Dr. Gelfand's reports and conclusions…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · October 5, 2004 · in the opinion
Chicano v. General Electric Company (2004)
Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 729 A.2d 614, 619-21 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1999) (applying the heeding presumption). "\[I\]n cases where warnings or instructions are required to make a product non-defective and a warning…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of South Carolina · January 19, 2021 · in the opinion
Robertson v. Air & Liquid Systems Corp. (2021)
Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corp., the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit held that the plaintiffs showed evidence of frequent and regular exposure where they were exposed to asbestos dust on a daily basis…
-
Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · June 11, 2003 · in the opinion
Faulkner v. McCarty Corp. (2003)
853 So.2d 24 (2003) Douglas FAULKNER and Gloria Faulkner v. THE McCARTY CORPORATION, Owens Corning Fiberglas Corporation, Combustion Engineering, Inc., Garlock, Inc., Pittsburgh-Corning Corporation, Rock Wool Manufacturing Company, Anco Insulations, Inc., Acands, Inc., Rapid…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · August 6, 2015 · in the opinion
Galasso v. BF Goodrich (Matter of New York City Asbestos Litig., 2015)
1995\]). In addition, issues of credibility are for the jury (Cochrane v Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corp., 219 AD2d 557, 559-60). Where "\[t\]he deposition testimony of a litigant is sufficient to raise an issue of…
-
Court case · Maryland Court of Appeals · July 8, 2013 · in the opinion
Georgia Pacific v. Farrar (2013)
…should have been aware, of the danger to household members at the time. See Rohrbaugh v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corporation, 965 F.2d 844 (10th Cir.1992) (applying Oklahoma law); Martin v. Cincinnati Gas and Electric…
-
Court case · Alabama Supreme Court · September 30, 2015 · in the opinion
Kruse v. Vanderbilt Minerals, LLC (2015)
…one element of causation,'... the \threshold requirement of any products liability action is identification of the injury-causing product and its manufacturer.'" Sheffield v. Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corp., 595 So.2d 443, 450 (Ala.1992) (citations…
-
Company document · 1969
The Potter v. Fibreboard case file (1969-1972)
The case The judgment names twelve defendants: Fibreboard, Combustion Engineering, Johns-Manville Products, Owens-Corning Fiberglas, Eagle-Picher, Pittsburgh Corning, Unarco, Philip Carey, Armstrong Contracting & Supply, Standard Asbestos, Ruberoid and Armstrong Cork. The insurer of his…
-
Company document · 1962
The Tomplait v. Combustion Engineering case file (1962-1969)
The case Tomplait sued the companies whose insulation he had installed in December 1966: Combustion Engineering and R&I Refractory and Insulation, three Johns-Manville companies, Owens-Corning Fiberglas, Pittsburgh Corning, Gustin-Bacon, Pittsburgh Plate Glass…
-
Company document · JM Knowledge Chronology · August 3, 1961
California Industrial Accident Commission Award in Riley v. Johns-Manville (1961)
…named first among the defendants, who also included Armstrong Cork Company, Philip Carey Manufacturing, Owens-Corning Fiberglas, Fibreboard Paper Products and many insulation contractors, and J-M was among the parties served. An earlier award in…
-
Company document · JM Litigation Chronology · March 1978
Johns-Manville Form 10-K for 1977: Legal Proceedings (1978)
…more than doubled in a year. The filing describes three groups of cases: four multi-plaintiff suits in New Jersey (about 500 Raybestos-Manhattan workers and an Owens-Corning Fiberglas group); indemnity actions by a former…
-
Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · May 22, 2019 · in the opinion
Lamson v. Georgia-Pacific LLC (2019)
…more than the presence of asbestos in the workplace; he must prove that he worked in the vicinity of the product's use. Coward v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 729 A.2d 614, 622 (Pa. Super…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · March 8, 2017 · in the opinion
Charlevoix v. Caterpillar, Inc. (2017)
821 Moreover, the plaintiff must show "the manufacturer's asbestos product was used at the specific site within the workplace where \[the plaintiff\] worked." Roberts v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 726 F.Supp. 172, 174 (W…
-
Court case · Iowa Supreme Court · July 1, 1998 · in the opinion
Ganske v. Spahn & Rose Lumber Co. (1998)
Id. at 71 (footnote omitted). The Kansas court in Tomlinson v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 244 Kan. 506, 770 P.2d 833 (1989), reached a similar result. Relying on the exclusivity provision of its workers' compensation…
-
Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · August 10, 2018 · in the opinion
Wallace & Gale Asbestos Settlement Trust v. Busch (2018)
…is what the Court of Appeals has "termed a \bystander,' in that he did not work directly with the asbestos products but was in the vicinity of where such products were used." Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · September 18, 2009 · in the opinion
O'neil v. Crane Co. (2009)
…PLC (1996) 45 Cal.App.4th 1224 \[53 Cal.Rptr.2d 642\]; Arena v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1998) 63 Cal.App.4th 1178, 1187 \[74 Cal.Rptr.2d 580\] \[raw asbestos fibers are not altered…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · April 22, 2010 · in the opinion
Whitmire v. Ingersoll-Rand Company (2010)
Such evidence is simply not "of sufficient weight to support a reasonable inference of causation." (Dumin v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1994) 28 Cal.App.4th 650, 656; see also McGonnell v. Kaiser Gypsum Co., supra…
-
Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · March 11, 1999 · in the opinion
North American Refractory Co. v. Easter (1999)
…asbestos that was uniformly distributed throughout the product. In finding sufficient evidence of exposure in an asbestos case, the Alabama Supreme Court in Sheffield v. Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corp., 595 So.2d 443, 456 (Ala.1992)…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · August 2, 2012 · in the opinion
Rollin v. Foster Wheeler, LLC (2012)
…and can be held strictly liable for injuries caused by their failure to warn. (Anderson v. Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corp. (1991) 53 Cal.3d 987, 1003.) The sophisticated user defense relieves a manufacturer from its usual…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · October 5, 2015 · in the opinion
Ricci v. Crane Co. (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2015)
Grace & Co.-Conn), 216 AD2d 79 \[1st Dept. 1995\]). Issues of credibility are for the jury (Cochrane v Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corp., 219 AD2d 557, 559-60). Where "\[t\]he deposition testimony of a litigant is…