980 results for “Owens-Corning Fiberglas”, page 18 of 49
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · June 8, 1998 · in the opinion
Gatton v. AP Green Services, Inc. (1998)
…in his own personal injury action —one which, according to the pleadings, produced a jury verdict in his favor and against Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corporation and American Honda Motor Company, Inc., just weeks before he died…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · October 25, 2022 · in the opinion
Walls v. Ford Motor Company (2022)
…evidence of exposure to a specific product on a regular basis over some extended period of time in proximity to where the plaintiff actually worked.'" (quoting Jones v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 69 F.3d 712…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · February 16, 2021 · in the opinion
Vinson v. Armstrong International, Inc. (2021)
…is in accord with federal courts that have routinely reached the same conclusion. See, e.g., Haislip v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 86 F.3d 1150 (table), 1996 WL 273686, at [\2] (4th Cir. May 23…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · February 15, 2017 · in the opinion
Saller v. Crown Cork & Seal Company, Inc. (2017)
…inter alia, upon a theory of design defect. (Anderson v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1991) 53 Cal.3d 987, 995.) Defective design may be established under two theories: (1) the consumer expectations test, which asks "whether…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · September 17, 2009 · in the opinion
Kirks v. General Electric Company (2009)
…a colorable federal defense; and (4) there is a causal nexus between the claims and the conduct performed under color of a federal office. Feidt v. Owens Corning Fiberglas Corp., 153 F.3d 124, 127 (3d…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · February 16, 2021 · in the opinion
Brock v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2021)
…is in accord with federal courts that have routinely reached the same conclusion. See, e.g., Haislip v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 86 F.3d 1150 (table), 1996 WL 273686, at [\2] (4th Cir. May 23…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of California · March 23, 2021 · in the opinion
Toy v. Armstrong Int'l (In re Asbestos, 2021)
…from asbestos\] was neither known nor knowable by the application of scientific knowledge available at the time of manufacture and/or distribution" of the product. See Anderson v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 53 Cal. 3d 987…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · May 22, 2024 · in the opinion
Williams v. JM Manufacturing Company, Inc. (2024)
…to adequately warn of those potential risks, and that the lack of sufficient warning was a substantial factor in causing Cornelius's harm. (Anderson v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1991) 53 Cal.3d 987, 1002, 993…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Indiana · May 14, 1999 · in the opinion
Spoonamore v. Armstrong World Industries, Inc. (1999)
…to evidence that links a John Crane product to Mr. Spoonamore's illness. Harris v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 102 F.3d 1429, 1433 (7th Cir.1996). In order to withstand a motion for summary judgment…
-
Court case · Michigan Supreme Court · December 29, 1986 · in the opinion
Larson v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp. (1986)
…958-959; 275 SE2d 900 (1981) (cause of action accrues when, according to medical testimony, plaintiff was first harmed by asbestos); Neubauer v Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp, 686 F2d 570, 577 (CA 7, 1982), cert den…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · February 2, 2009 · in the opinion
Wangen v. Gardner Denver, Inc. (2009)
…other factors. But the same court also cited with approval the Hansen v. Owens\[-Corning Fiberglas Corp.\] (1996) 51 Cal.App.4th 753, deferring to that court's opinion in the context of asbestos litigation. The…
-
Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · April 15, 2009 · in the opinion
Daley v. AW Chesterton, Inc. (2009)
…Marinari, supra at 1028. See also McCauley v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 715 A.2d 1125 (Pa.Super.1998) (holding plaintiff may bring subsequent action for separate disease resulting from asbestos exposure). Specifically, In such actions…
-
Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · September 16, 2002 · in the opinion
Wilson v. AP Green Industries, Inc. (2002)
…that \[her\] contact with it was of such a nature as to raise a reasonable inference that \[s\]he inhaled asbestos fibers that emanated from it." Coward v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 729 A.2d 614…
-
Court case · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · December 4, 2018 · in the opinion
Stearns v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company (2018)
…c. 260, § 2D, the so-called asbestos revival statute, see Commonwealth v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 38 Mass. App. Ct. 600, 603 (1995), the Legislature established special time periods during which the [\537] Commonwealth and its…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · December 27, 2022 · in the opinion
King v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. (2022)
…When there are multiple causes of injury, "a defendant's conduct is a cause in fact if it is a substantial factor generating plaintiff's harm." Adams v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 923 So. 2d 118…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · March 30, 2017 · in the opinion
Johnson v. Dock (2017)
…the more lenient approach, it is sufficient if the plaintiff proves the defendant's product was at his or her work site." (Dumin v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1994) 28 Cal.App.4th 650, 655 (Dumin…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · August 30, 2024 · in the opinion
Brooks v. Mission Stucco Company (2024)
…presented to the jury." (Saller, supra, 187 Cal.App.4th at pp. 1231-1232; Anderson v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1991) 53 Cal.3d 987, 995; Barker v. Lull Engineering Co. (1978) 20 Cal.3d 413…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · June 4, 2021 · in the opinion
Swanson v. The Marley-Wylain Co. (2021)
…than one proximate cause of an injury" such that multiple "causes frequently operate concurrently so that \[they\] constitute a direct proximate cause of the resulting harm." (Allen v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1997) 225 Mich.App…
-
Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · February 2, 2010 · in the opinion
Scapa Dryer Fabrics, Inc. v. Saville (2010)
…to the Cross-Defendants' products than to Scapa's products, and that the jury's verdict is therefore inconsistent and warrants a JNOV.\[5\] As the Court of Appeals explained in Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. v…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · August 31, 2017 · in the opinion
Charlevoix v. Caterpillar (In re Asbestos Litigation, 2017)
…products, "in the scope of \[the plaintiff's\] entire work history," should be considered in determining whether defendant's conduct was a substantial contributing factor. Allen v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 571N.W.2d530, 533 (Mich…