Search

848 results for “Ford Motor Company”, page 19 of 43

1. Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · April 10, 2024 · in the opinion

   Fisher v. American International Industries (2024)

   …containing product was sufficiently \frequent, regular and proximate' to support a jury's finding that \[the\] defendant's product was substantially causative of the disease." Rost v. Ford Motor Co., 151 A.3d 1032, 1044 (Pa…

2. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · January 5, 2015 · in the opinion

   Comardelle v. Pennsylvania General Ins. Co. (2015)

   …expert causation testimony based on the "every exposure" theory. 633 First, in Smith v. Ford Motor Co., the district court excluded Dr. Hammar's opinion that a plaintiff's exposure to brake dust caused his mesothelioma…

3. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit · April 8, 1981 · in the opinion

   Porter v. American Optical Corp. (1981)

   …75. See McCormack v. Noble Drilling Corp., 608 F.2d 169 (5th Cir. 1979); Stockstill v. Gypsum Transportation, 607 F.2d 1112 (5th Cir. 1979); King v. Ford Motor Co., 597 F.2d 436 (5th Cir.

4. Court case · Maryland Court of Appeals · May 15, 1998 · in the opinion

   Porter Hayden v. Bullinger (1998)

   …a\]ny agreement between some, but not all, of the litigants should be disclosed upon the request of any party in accordance with our rules of procedure"); Ford Motor Co. v. Leggat, 904 S.W.2d…

5. Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · May 31, 2016 · in the opinion

   Stein v. Pfizer Inc. (2016)

   …law); Ford Motor Co. v. Mathis, 322 F.2d 267 (5th Cir. 1963) (applying Texas law); Putnam v. Erie City Mfg. Co., 338 F.2d 911 (5th Cir. 1964) (applying Texas law); Standard Motor Co. v…

6. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · March 6, 2017 · in the opinion

   Bell v. Foster Wheeler Energy Corp. (2017)

   …to say, in the realm of asbestos exposure, the percentages alone simply do not bear out specific causation testimony one way or the other. See Yates v. Ford Motor Co., 113 F. Supp. 3d 841, 847…

7. Court case · California Court of Appeal · November 13, 1996 · in the opinion

   Hansen v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1996)

   …in light of the evidence before it. (Ford Motor Co. v. Insurance Co. of North America (1995) 35 Cal. App.4th 604, 610 \[41 Cal. Rptr.2d 342\] (Ford).) Therefore, OC bore the burden of proving…

8. Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Florida · August 2, 2012 · in the opinion

   Faddish v. Buffalo Pumps (2012)

   …distribution is that " \[t\]hey are an integral part of the overall producing and marketing enterprise that should bear the cost of injuries resulting from defective products." Vandermark v. Ford Motor Co., 61 Cal.2d 256…

9. Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · June 25, 1982 · in the opinion

   Froud v. Celotex Corporation (1982)

   …as indicated by the recent single personal injury jury verdict in the amount of $127.8 million, of which $125 million was for punitive damages. (Richard Grimshaw v. Ford Motor Co., Superior Court, Santa Ana, Cal.…

10. Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · January 14, 2004 · in the opinion

    In re Roc (2004)

    …based on a reliable foundation). This court has held that when "an expert's testimony lacks a reliable scientific basis, its admission by the trial court constitutes an abuse of discretion." Ford Motor Co. v. Aguiniga…

11. Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of Pennsylvania · July 21, 2020 · in the opinion

    Gorton v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2020)

    …to the claims at issue. (ECF No. 408 at 10-14.) Defendants rely on the Pennsylvania Supreme Court's decision in Rost v. Ford Motor Co., 151 A.3d 1032 (Pa. 2016), which held that "expert…

12. Court case · Missouri Court of Appeals · May 11, 2004 · in the opinion

    Goede v. Aerojet General Corporation (2004)

    …501 (Mo.App. W.D. 1991); Rinker v. Ford Motor Co., 567 S.W.2d 655, 660(Mo.App. 1978). Lastly, Aerojet complains that in awarding lump-sum damages without assigning any amounts to any particular…

13. Court case · Utah Supreme Court · November 18, 2021 · in the opinion

    Boynton v. Kennecott Utah Copper, LLC (2021)

    …E.2d at 210; In re Certified Question from Fourteenth Dist. Ct. App. of Tex. (Miller v. Ford Motor Co.), 479 Mich. 498, 740 N.W.2d 206, 214-15 (2007). For those courts, the "relationship…

14. Court case · New York Supreme Court · March 31, 2014 · in the opinion

    Burawa v. Acker Drill Co. (2014)

    …of the engine made by a company other than the engine manufacturer? A. Yes. Q. Who was the block maker than you're familiar with? A. Chris-Craft I know had Hercules motors and Gray Marine…

15. Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · March 24, 2020 · in the opinion

    Schrader v. Ameron International Corporation (2020)

    …Ford Motor Co., 160 A.3d 1135 (Del. 2017) (unpublished disposition at 2017 WL 1422626 [\3]). In Walls, the decedent was exposed to asbestos from, among other sources, brake changes performed on Ford vehicles in the…

16. Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of Illinois · December 22, 2014 · in the opinion

    Krik v. Crane Co. (2014)

    …See Schultz, 721 F.3d at 432 (recognizing that such broad opinions give rise to concerns about "an ill-defined floor"); see also Smith v. Ford Motor Co., No. 2:08-cv-630, 2013 WL 214378…

17. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit · March 23, 1984 · in the opinion

    Jackson v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp. (1984)

    …protection to a rigidly literal class of "users and consumers." In Ford Motor Co. v. Cockrell, 211 So.2d 833 (Miss.1968), a city employee noticed smoke rising from the motor of an unattended city truck…

18. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · September 16, 2020 · in the opinion

    Dempster v. Lamorak Ins. Co. (2020)

    …1096, 2016 WL 3966142, at [\6] (M.D. Fla. June 30, 2016); Yates v. Ford Motor Co., No. 12-752, 2015 WL 3463559, at [\10] (E.D.N.C. May 30, 2015). \[49\] See Dugas, No…

19. Court case · California Court of Appeal · November 17, 2009 · in the opinion

    Merrill v. Leslie Controls, Inc. (2009)

    …which makes them better able to insure that the component is suitable for their specific applications. (Springmeyer v. Ford Motor Co. (1998) 60 Cal.App.4th 1541, 1554 \[71 Cal.Rptr.2d 190\].) Liability of a…

20. Court case · Kentucky Court of Appeals · August 9, 2019 · in the opinion

    Schneider Electric USA, Inc. v. Williams (2019)

    …raise direct and indirect exposure allegations.\[5\] However, unverified complaints "are not generally regarded as competent evidence of an admission or confession against the party on whose behalf such pleadings are drafted." Ford Motor Co. v…