No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

495 results for “Ford Motor Company”, page 19 of 25

  1. Court case · California Court of Appeal · July 6, 2021 · in the opinion

    Khosravan v. Chevron Corporation (2021)

    …offer, the judgment constitutes prima facie evidence showing the offer was reasonable and the offeror is eligible for costs as specified in section 998."'" (Adams v. Ford Motor Co. (2011) 199 Cal.App.4th 1475, 1484…

  2. Court case · Georgia Supreme Court · July 5, 2016 · in the opinion

    Scapa Dryer Fabrics, Inc. v. Knight (2016)

    …through use of expert testimony, a significant and sustained exposure in the plaintiff's history."). See also Yates v. Ford Motor Co., 113 F.Supp.3d 841, 862 (E.D.N.C. 2015) (testimony inadmissible where…

  3. Court case · Virginia Supreme Court · January 10, 2013 · in the opinion

    Exxon Mobil Corporation v. Minton (2013)

    …proceedings if he be so advised. \[1\] We have today rejected the substantial contributing factor analysis of proximate causation in cases tried under Virginia law when multiple sufficient causation is alleged. Ford Motor Co. v. Boomer…

  4. Court case · Washington Supreme Court · June 4, 2009 · in the opinion

    Lunsford v. Saberhagen Holdings, Inc. (2009)

    …86, 113 S.Ct. 2510, 125 L.Ed.2d 74 (1993). \[2\] Ulmer v. Ford Motor Co., 75 Wash.2d 522, 452 P.2d 729 (1969). \[3\] Seattle-First Nat'l Bank v. Tabert, 86 Wash…

  5. Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Illinois · September 3, 2009 · in the opinion

    Fuller v. AW Chesterton, Inc. (2009)

    …Duro Dyne Corp.; Essex Specialty Products, LLC; ExxonMobil Oil Corp.; Federal-Mogul Asbestos Personal Injury Trust as successor to Felt-Products Manufacturing Co.; Ford Motor Co.; Foster Wheeler Energy Corp.; Gardner Denver, Inc.; Gardner-Gibson, Inc.…

  6. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Maine · September 16, 2020 · in the opinion

    Coffin v. Ametek, Inc. (2020)

    …2018 WL 3819027, at [\16] (W.D. Wash. Aug. 10, 2018) (quoting Rost v. Ford Motor Co., 151 A.3d 1032, 1045 (Pa. 2016)). Nevertheless, as the court in Jack explained, "\[t\]hese \irrefutable scientific fact…

  7. Court case · U.S. District Court, Central District of California · February 10, 2015 · in the opinion

    Hendricks v. Armstrong International, Inc. (2015)

    …originally been filed in federal court. 28 U.S.C. § 1441(a); see also Snow v. Ford Motor Co., 561 F.2d 787, 789 (9th Cir. 1977). As the removing party, Defendant bears the burden of…

  8. Court case · California Court of Appeal · August 23, 2018 · in the opinion

    Williams v. the Pep Boys Manny Moe & Jack OF California (2018)

    …which occurred "during the 1960's through the mid-1980's." \[17\] "A \shade tree mechanic' is someone who maintains and repairs his vehicles himself." (Adams v. Ford Motor Co. (2011) 199 Cal.App.4th 1475…

  9. Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · January 15, 2019 · in the opinion

    Ament v. John Crane-Houdalille, Inc. (2019)

    …court not sustained objections to those questions below. The Aments further assert that "Dr. Frank's testimony and opinions were exactly what was permitted and approved in" Dixon v. Ford Motor Co., 433 Md. 137 (2013)…

  10. Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · September 26, 2012 · in the opinion

    Georgia-Pacific v. Farrar (2012)

    …of other suppliers. Id. at 209 (footnote omitted). \[5\] We will briefly comment upon an additional matter. On June 29, 2012, this Court filed its opinion in Dixon v. Ford Motor Co., \_\_\_ Md. App. \_\_\_, No. 536…

  11. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit · June 20, 2023 · in the opinion

    Johnson v. Edward Orton, JR. Ceramic Foundation (2023)

    …5 Ill.2d 614, 126 N.E.2d 836, 840 (1955)). "A manufacturer has a nondelegable duty to design a reasonably safe product." Jablonski v. Ford Motor Co., 353 Ill.Dec. 327, 955 N.E.2d…

  12. Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Illinois · August 31, 2009 · in the opinion

    Funk v. AW Chesterton, Inc. (2009)

    …Inc.; Federal-Mogul Asbestos Personal Injury Trust as successor to Felt-Products Manufacturing Co.; Federal-Mogul Asbestos Personal Injury Trust as successor to the former Vellumoid Division of Federal-Mogul; Ford Motor Co.; Foseco, Inc.; Foster…

  13. Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Wisconsin · July 7, 2017 · in the opinion

    Carroll v. John Crane, Inc. (2017)

    …viewpoint that, because science has failed to establish that any specific dosage of asbestos causes injury, every exposure to asbestos should be considered a cause of injury." Yates v. Ford Motor Co., 113 F. Supp. 3d…

  14. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Missouri · July 5, 2017 · in the opinion

    MacCormack v. the Adel Wiggins Group (2017)

    …that under some circumstances even in the case of default, where a party actively participated in the litigation previously, collateral estoppel would apply); see also Ellis v. Ford Motor Co., 628 F. Supp. 849, 857 (D…

  15. Court case · California Court of Appeal · May 14, 2019 · in the opinion

    Mettias v. The Pep Boys Manny, Moe & Jack of California (Laosd Asbestos Cases, 2019)

    …evidence." (Hasson v. Ford Motor Co. (1977) 19 Cal.3d 530, 543 \[138 Cal.Rptr. 705, 564 P.2d 857\], italics omitted, overruled on different grounds in Soule v. General Motors Corp. (1994) 8 Cal.4th…

  16. Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · March 2, 2021 · in the opinion

    Neely EX rel. Estate OF Goehring v. Union Carbide Corporation (2021)

    …record indicates that the Union Carbide products at issue contained chrysotile fibers, but none of the attached studies specifically looked at that type of fiber. See Yates v. Ford Motor Co., 113 F. Supp. 3d 841…

  17. Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · February 27, 2006 · in the opinion

    In re Fluor Enterprises, Inc. (2006)

    …is an extraordinary remedy, available only when a trial court clearly abuses its discretion and when there is no adequate remedy by appeal. In re Ford Motor Co., 165 S.W.3d 315, 317 (Tex.2005…

  18. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit · August 17, 1998 · in the opinion

    Cimino v. Raymark Industries, Inc. (1998)

    …we are not persuaded that reversible error has been demonstrated or that manifest injustice would result by allowing the verdict to stand. See Johnson v. Ford Motor Co., 988 F.2d 573, 582 (5th Cir.1993)…

  19. Court case · California Court of Appeal · May 18, 2021 · in the opinion

    Phipps v. Copeland Corporation LLC (2021)

    …(Cf. Buell-Wilson v. Ford Motor Co. (2006) 141 Cal.App.4th 525, 553 \[jury's award of 13 times the amount counsel for plaintiffs requested in noneconomic damages and three times the amount requested for…

  20. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit · February 27, 1986 · in the opinion

    Kisor v. Johns-Manville Corp. (1986)

    …of the product he has produced rather than his behavior and, therefore, strict liability does not sound in negligence. (citations omitted). Lenhardt v. Ford Motor Co., 102 Wash.2d 208, 212-13, 683 P.2d 1097…