547 results for “General Electric”, page 19 of 28
-
Court case · Oregon Supreme Court · October 21, 1980 · in the opinion
Matter of Fossum (1980)
…by the employee's omission to claim, because the dependent is claiming in his own right. This view is consistent with the general principle, often found expressed in connection with employees' waivers, releases or compromise settlements…
-
Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · April 17, 2015 · in the opinion
Amato v. Bell & Gossett (2015)
…of Pittsburgh, 409 Pa. 357, 186 A.2d 399 (1962), which it asserts stands for the general rule that "for the same injury, an injured party may have but one satisfaction." Id. at 402. However, Crane…
-
Court case · Virginia Supreme Court · January 10, 1992 · in the opinion
Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. v. Watson (1992)
…omitted). See also Ford Motor Co. v. Phelps, 239 Va. 272, 276, 389 S.E.2d 454, 457 (1990); General Motors Corp. v. Lupica, 237 Va. 516, 521, 379 S.E.2d 311, 314 (1989). Additionally…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · January 11, 2023 · in the opinion
Lebeau v. Huntington Ingalls Inc. (2023)
… to pertain; refer; to bring into association with or connection with.'"\[66\] Unlike the general removal statute, which must be strictly construed in favor of remand, the Federal Officer Removal statute's language must be liberally…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Oregon · January 31, 2024 · in the opinion
Long v. 3M Company (2024)
…has a potentially disruptive impact on maritime commerce, and (2) the general character of the activity giving rise to the incident shows a substantial relationship to traditional maritime activity. Id. Before the Supreme Court announced the…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · October 13, 2022 · in the opinion
Falgout v. Anco Insulations, Inc. (2022)
…Trevino v. General Dynamics Corporation, where the Fifth Circuit determined the first element of the Boyle defense was not satisfied when the government specification at issue only requires compliance with minimal or general standards, the Adams…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · December 20, 2021 · in the opinion
Sentilles v. Huntington Ingalls Inc. (2021)
…73 at 8-9. But the Court has considered the affidavit at this summary-judgment stage of the case only for the general opinions about mesothelioma expressed therein. The Court shares Pelnor's doubts about the…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Maine · December 29, 1986 · in the opinion
In re All Maine Asbestos Litigation (1986)
…very different tone than the 1969 Ship Repair Contracting Manual's Paragraph 12-7(b), which states that "\[i\]n general, the SUPSHIP surveyor should not be concerned with unsafe practices on the part of the…
-
Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · March 3, 2014 · in the opinion
Farrow v. Alfa Laval, Inc. (2014)
…Technologies, L.L.C. (sued individually and as successor-in-interest to Garlock, Inc.); General Motors Corporation (sued individually and as successor-in-interest to Harrison Thermal System and Harrison Radiator); Goulds Pumps, Inc.; Hardie-Tynes…
-
Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · March 18, 2009 · in the opinion
Hymel v. Eagle, Inc. (2009)
…362 (La. 1980). It follows that the compromise instrument is governed by the same general rules of construction applicable to contracts. Brown, 630 So.2d at 748. When the words of a contract are clear and…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · March 25, 2020 · in the opinion
Vocciante v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2020)
…Id. at ¶ 28) Accordingly, plaintiffs assert claims for strict liability, negligence, false representation, violation of the Jones Act, violation of general maritime law, loss of consortium, wrongful death, and seek, inter alia, punitive damages. (Id. at…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · September 9, 2009 · in the opinion
Oxford v. Foster Wheeler LLC (2009)
…unable to conclude that the jury's verdict was based on a finding of negligent failure to warn because the special verdict form is inconsistent.\[5\] [\715] The jury was given general negligence instructions BAJI Nos…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · August 4, 2017 · in the opinion
Templet v. Avondale Industries, Inc. (2017)
… refer; to bring into association with or connection with.'"\[111\] Unlike the general removal statute, which must be "strictly construed in favor of remand," the federal officer removal statute's language must be liberally interpreted.\[112…
-
Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit · March 5, 1986 · in the opinion
Herber v. Johns-Manville Corp. (1986)
…Asbestos Textile Institute Inc.; Uni-Royal Inc.; Carolina Asbestos Company; J. Franklin Burke Co.; General Asbestos Co.; Asbestos Textile Co.; Ruberoid Company Inc.; and John Doe(s). Appeal of EAGLE-PICHER INDUSTRIES, INC., Appellant in No…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · February 5, 2019 · in the opinion
Schindler v. Dravo Basic Materials Company (2019)
…sufficient information about the circumstances or level of the plaintiff's exposure attributable to the defendant's negligence that goes beyond a general statement that the plaintiff was exposed to some amount of a toxic substance…
-
Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · September 18, 1989 · in the opinion
IN the Matter of Estate OF Foster (1989)
…Innes deposition testimony as a whole, therefore, the trial court did not abuse its discretion in allowing it as general background to the early production levels of the Owens-Illinois product. Affirmed. WINSOR, J., and DEIERLEIN…
-
Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, First Circuit · July 17, 2003 · in the opinion
Bath Iron Works Corp. v. US Dept. of Labor (2003)
…injury and claim for benefits were timely filed." In a similar vein, the ALJ, citing § 920(b) and Fortier v. General Dynamics Corp., 15 B.R.B.S. 4 (1982), appeal dismissed sub nom, Insurance Co…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · February 17, 2023 · in the opinion
Crossland v. Huntington Ingalls, Inc. (2023)
…s expert witness, Dr. Staggs.\[19\] Both experts testify to general and specific causation. Woodward contends that both experts' specific causation opinions are unreliable because they are premised on unreliable facts.\[20\] Second, Woodward moves for…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · September 11, 2019 · in the opinion
Parfait v. Huntington Ingalls Incorporated (2019)
…Co., 149 F.3d 387, 397 (5th Cir. 1998). Another feature distinguishing the federal officer removal statute from the general removal statute is that, unlike § 1441(a),\[6\] § 1442(a) must be liberally construed. See Watson…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Kansas · August 19, 1986 · in the opinion
Menne v. Celotex Corp. (1986)
…the cause in fact of his injuries does not undermine the principle that a defendant should only be held responsible for the damage it caused. As long as a plaintiff can prove general causation, i.e.…