376 results for “General Electric”, page 19 of 19
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Central District of California · April 17, 2014 · in the opinion
Sclafani v. Air & Liquid Systems Corp. (2014)
…Rptr. 456 (citation and internal quotation marks omitted). Consistent with this general rule, the California Supreme Court held in Rutherford that an asbestos personal injury plaintiff need not prove with certainty that the defendant's product…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington · December 2, 2014 · in the opinion
McMann v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2014)
…an exception to the general rule that employers are not liable for injuries suffered by independent contractors: "A common-law exception to the rule of nonliability \[for injuries to independent contractors\] exists where the employer of…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Illinois · August 22, 2014 · in the opinion
Burns v. All Acquisitions, LLC (2014)
…alleging state law claims and there does not appear to be diversity of citizenship. "The well established general rule is that jurisdiction is determined at the time of removal and nothing filed after removal affects jurisdiction…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of California · March 31, 2021 · in the opinion
Toy v. Warren Pumps (In re Asbestos, 2021)
…es\] the \[expert's\] reasoning or methodology, using as appropriate such criteria as testability, publication in peer reviewed literature, and general acceptance." Id. at 564. III. DISCUSSION Defendants contend that Captain Burger should not be allowed…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of Pennsylvania · October 13, 2022 · in the opinion
Gorton v. Gardner Denver, Inc. (2022)
…... the courts have held that the pleader must establish jurisdiction with evidence from other sources, such as affidavits or depositions.... The general rule, therefore, is that a pleading's allegations of subject matter jurisdiction are taken…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of California · September 27, 2023 · in the opinion
Marcus v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2023)
…officer removal statute, Leite, 749 F.3d at 1122 ("We recognize that defendants enjoy much broader removal rights under the federal officer removal statute than they do under the general removal statute\[.\]"); Durham, 445 F.3d…
-
Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit · June 19, 1991 · in the opinion
Cochran v. EI DuPont de Nemours (1991)
…2552-53, 91 L.Ed.2d 265 (1986). II. Federal Admiralty and General Maritime Jurisdiction The judicial power of the United States extends to "all cases of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction." U.S. Const. Art. III…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · September 3, 2014 · in the opinion
Feuerman v. A.O. Smith Water Prods. Co. (Matter of New York City Asbestos Litig., 2014)
…All seven of the plaintiffs in proposed joint trial Group One are alleged to have been exposed, in general, to asbestos at commercial and residential job sites in and around the New York City area while…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Missouri · January 30, 2018 · in the opinion
MacCormack v. Ingersoll-Rand Company (2018)
…App. Ct. 1987) (reasoning that a worsening of a condition did not justify a subsequent new action as "\[t\]he general rule is, of course, that a plaintiff is entitled to one recovery in a personal…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · October 28, 2022 · in the opinion
Walls v. Ford Motor Company (2022)
…. which of Defendants' experts offer the challenged general causation opinion." (Id. at 30.) The Court did not have the benefit of knowing which experts seek to testify that exposure to vehicle friction products categorically cannot cause…
-
Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · July 16, 1992 · in the opinion
Bowers v. Fibreboard Corporation (1992)
…admitted all but one of the books into evidence, apparently under a then existing exception to the hearsay rule for treatises dealing with events of general history. Appellants challenged the trial court's exclusion of the…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · August 18, 2021 · in the opinion
Cox v. Foster Wheeler (In re Asbestos Litigation, 2021)
…6); 3) incorrectly interpreting "the narrow exception to maritime law's general rule that an equipment manufacturer is not liable for an injury caused by a third-party product used with its equipment" (id. at 7…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington · July 6, 2023 · in the opinion
Welch v. Crane Co. (2023)
…each of their experts' reports, and Plaintiff will have the opportunity to object to such testimony at trial. And general causation testimony may be relevant and helpful to the trier of fact. Elorreaga v. Rockwell Automation…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · September 17, 2009 · in the opinion
Clemmer v. Thorpe Insulation Company (2009)
…s and its trucks were present at the LBNS almost daily. Ay acknowledged that the federal government's General Services Administration (GSA) was the larger supplier; but Thorpe was the predominant supplier among the outside companies…
-
Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · October 3, 2014 · in the opinion
May v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2014)
…2d at 1369 ("\[t\]he rationale underpinning the general rule of strict liability is that it logically and fairly places the loss caused by a defective product on those who create the risk and reap the…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Maryland · September 29, 2016 · in the opinion
Rhodes v. McIC, Inc. (2016)
…Spartan Motors Chassis, Inc., 519 F.3d 192, 199 (4th Cir. 2008) (language in general removal statute, 28 U.S.C. § 1446(a), "is deliberately parallel to the requirements for notice pleading found in Rule 8…