No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

35 results for “Ford Motor Company”, page 2 of 2

  1. Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of Illinois · April 11, 2022 · in the opinion

    Lishman v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2022)

    …waive personal jurisdiction. The Court next turns to the merits of the personal jurisdiction defense. As discussed, personal jurisdiction is either general or specific. See Ford Motor Co. v. Montana Eight Judicial District Court, 141 S…

  2. Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · November 24, 2014 · in the opinion

    Shipley v. Hoke (2014)

    …regarding the effect of termination of supplementary proceedings. ¶ 75 Whether the court had subject-matter jurisdiction to entertain a claim is a question of law that we review de novo. Crossroads Ford Truck Sales, Inc. v…

  3. Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of Illinois · November 23, 2021 · in the opinion

    Johnson v. Orton (2021)

    …underpinnings" and "correctness of the expert's conclusions" may affect any ultimate determination on the merits, but do not govern admissibility. See Smith v. Ford Motor Co., 215 F.3d 713, 718-19 (7th Cir. 2000)…

  4. Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · September 5, 2018 · in the opinion

    McKinney v. Hobart Bros. Co. (2018)

    …showing not only that Frank himself was qualified but also that his reliance on Dement's work was (1) customary in Frank's field and (2) reasonable. See Connelly v. General Motors Corp., 184 Ill. App…

  5. Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · May 9, 1991 · in the opinion

    Wehmeier v. Unr Industries, Inc. (1991)

    …Fetzer Co. v. Dile (9th Cir.1981), 643 F.2d 670; Smith v. Ford Motor Co. (10th Cir.1980), 626 F.2d 784.) In Scott, the lower court permitted plaintiff, through previous undisclosed witnesses, to advance…

  6. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit · August 31, 2017 · in the opinion

    Krik v. Exxon Mobil Corp. (2017)

    …1992); United States v. Dixon, 413 F.3d 520, 524-25 (5th Cir. 2005); Yates v. Ford Motor Co., 113 F.Supp.3d 841, 862 (E.D.N.C. 2015); Betz v. Pneumo Abex, LLC, 615…

  7. Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Illinois · August 31, 2015 · in the opinion

    Bell v. Abb Group, Inc. (2015)

    …806 (7th Cir. 2013) (Daubert "remains the gold standard for evaluating the reliability of expert testimony."). The Seventh Circuit's Opinion in Smith v. Ford Motor Co., 215 F.3d 713 (7th Cir. 2000) provides the…

  8. Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Illinois · August 20, 2015 · in the opinion

    Neureuther v. Atlas Copco Compressors, LLC (2015)

    …gold standard for evaluating the reliability of expert testimony."). The Seventh Circuit's Opinion in Smith v. Ford Motor Co., 215 F.3d 713 (7th Cir. 2000) provides the framework for analyzing Defendant's first argument…

  9. Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Illinois · September 3, 2009 · in the opinion

    Fuller v. AW Chesterton, Inc. (2009)

    …Duro Dyne Corp.; Essex Specialty Products, LLC; ExxonMobil Oil Corp.; Federal-Mogul Asbestos Personal Injury Trust as successor to Felt-Products Manufacturing Co.; Ford Motor Co.; Foster Wheeler Energy Corp.; Gardner Denver, Inc.; Gardner-Gibson, Inc.…

  10. Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Illinois · August 18, 2015 · in the opinion

    Neureuther v. Atlas Copco Compressors, LLC (2015)

    …806 (7th Cir. 2013) (Daubert "remains the gold standard for evaluating the reliability of expert testimony."). The Seventh Circuit's Opinion in Smith v. Ford Motor Co., 215 F.3d 713 (7th Cir. 2000) provides the…

  11. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit · June 20, 2023 · in the opinion

    Johnson v. Edward Orton, JR. Ceramic Foundation (2023)

    …5 Ill.2d 614, 126 N.E.2d 836, 840 (1955)). "A manufacturer has a nondelegable duty to design a reasonably safe product." Jablonski v. Ford Motor Co., 353 Ill.Dec. 327, 955 N.E.2d…

  12. Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Illinois · August 31, 2009 · in the opinion

    Funk v. AW Chesterton, Inc. (2009)

    …Inc.; Federal-Mogul Asbestos Personal Injury Trust as successor to Felt-Products Manufacturing Co.; Federal-Mogul Asbestos Personal Injury Trust as successor to the former Vellumoid Division of Federal-Mogul; Ford Motor Co.; Foseco, Inc.; Foster…

  13. Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · January 21, 2020 · in the opinion

    Krumwiede v. Tremco, Inc. (2020)

    …is scientifically impossible to separate out each exposure and say exposure A contributed to the person's total dose but exposure B did not." Further, they rely on Rost v. Ford Motor Co., 637 Pa. 625…

  14. Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of Illinois · March 23, 2017 · in the opinion

    John Crane, Inc. v. Simon Greenstone Panatier Bartlett, Apc (2017)

    …G. Minarik, Bartlit Beck Herman Palenchar & Scott LLP, Mark Edward Ferguson, Bartlit Beck Herman Palenchar & Scott LLP & Matthew Raymond Ford, Bartlit Beck Herman Palenchar & Scott Llp. Simon Greenstone Panatier Bartlett, Defendant, represented by Avery B. Pardee…

  15. Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · August 31, 2012 · in the opinion

    Menssen v. Pneumo Abex Corporation (2012)

    …Brake Shoe and Foundry Company (Abex's predecessor) (Rodarmel, 2011 IL App (4th) 100463, ¶ 13, 957 N.E.2d 107); (4) from 1959 through 1963, John D. Biggers, chairman of the Libbey-Owens-Ford Glass Company…