59 results for “Ford Motor Company”, page 2 of 3
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Louisiana · May 28, 2015 · in the opinion
Hayes v. Asbestos Corp. Ltd. (2015)
…Hayes' illness. The court further holds that the warnings and instructions from OSHA and Ford Motor Company as well as Mr. Oustalet's testimony that he relied on his service technicians to read and follow said…
-
Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · December 9, 2009 · in the opinion
Bourque v. Anco Insulations, Inc. (2009)
…Polk, Schell, etal., New Orleans, LA, for Defendants/Appellees, General Motors, Ford Motor Company. Court composed of JIMMIE C. PETERS, MARC T. AMY and MICHAEL G. SULLIVAN, Judges. AMY, Judge. Former employee and wife brought personal…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · August 25, 2022 · in the opinion
Becnel v. Lamorak Insurance Co. (2022)
…have also joined and adopted these various motions, including American Insurance Company, International Paper Company, Uniroyal Holding, Inc., Pneumo Abex, LLC, BMW of North America, LLC, Volkswagen Group of America, Inc., Ford Motor Company, gulf Engineering…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · February 23, 2021 · in the opinion
Brindell v. Carlisle Industrial Brake and Friction Inc. (2021)
…death."\[128\] During oral argument, Removing Defendants cited Michel v. Ford Motor Company\[129\] and Smith v. Union Carbide\[130\] to support these arguments. When conducting a summary inquiry, the Court determines only whether the plaintiff…
-
Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · May 22, 1996 · in the opinion
Egan v. Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corp. (1996)
…is to apply the law of the state with the most significant contacts. Lee v. Ford Motor Company, supra. \ \ \ \ \ \ \[If\] a true conflict exists, the second step is to determine which state has the most significant…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · October 23, 2014 · in the opinion
Laurent v. City of New Orleans (2014)
…are: City of New Orleans, Gentilly Racing Corporation, Ford Motor Company, Toyota Motor Sales USA, Inc., Daimler North America Corporation, Volkswagon of America, Inc., BMW of North America, Inc., American Honda Motor Company, Inc., Anco Insulations…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Louisiana · July 14, 2014 · in the opinion
Davidson v. Georgia Pacific LLC (2014)
…for the District of Utah, in two recent cases, Anderson v. Ford Motor Company, 950 F. Supp.2d 1217 (D. Utah 2013) and Smith v. Ford Motor Company, No. 2:08-630, 2013 WL 214378 (D…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · November 17, 2016 · in the opinion
Sheppard v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company (2016)
…in this district recognize that "\[f\]raud by silence. . . \is, by its very nature, difficult to plead with particularity.'" In re Ford Motor Co. Vehicle Paint Litig., No. 1063, 1997 WL 539665, at [\3] (E.D…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · December 15, 2014 · in the opinion
Comardelle v. Pennsylvania General Insurance Company (2014)
…the states do not conflict \[on the relevant issue\], then no choice-of-law analysis is necessary.'" Schneider Nat'l Transp. v. Ford Motor Co., 280 F.3d 532, 536 (5th Cir. 2002) (quoting W.R…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · January 5, 2015 · in the opinion
Comardelle v. Pennsylvania General Insurance Company (2015)
…similar expert causation testimony based on the "every exposure" theory. First, in Smith v. Ford Motor Co., the district court excluded Dr. Hammar's opinion that a plaintiff's exposure to brake dust caused his mesothelioma…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · January 24, 2017 · in the opinion
Sheppard v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company (2017)
…E.D. La. July 18, 2014) (applying test); In re Ford Motor Co. Vehicle Paint Litig., 1997 WL 539665, at [\3] (same). The Court finds that Sheppard has once again failed to plead the "who, what…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · October 6, 2016 · in the opinion
Bell v. Foster Wheeler Energy Corp. (2016)
The rules of evidence do not permit an expert to testify that "\[j\]ust because we cannot rule anything out" that "we can rule everything in." Smith v. Ford Motor Co., No. 08-630, 2013 WL…
-
Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · December 3, 2008 · in the opinion
Benard v. Eagle, Inc. (2008)
…the general speedy manner in which this Court handles applications for rehearing when this Court is notified of the urgency of the need for prompt action. In Centanni v. Ford Motor Co., 93-1133 (La.App…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · January 5, 2015 · in the opinion
Comardelle v. Pennsylvania General Ins. Co. (2015)
…expert causation testimony based on the "every exposure" theory. 633 First, in Smith v. Ford Motor Co., the district court excluded Dr. Hammar's opinion that a plaintiff's exposure to brake dust caused his mesothelioma…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · March 6, 2017 · in the opinion
Bell v. Foster Wheeler Energy Corp. (2017)
…to say, in the realm of asbestos exposure, the percentages alone simply do not bear out specific causation testimony one way or the other. See Yates v. Ford Motor Co., 113 F. Supp. 3d 841, 847…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · September 16, 2020 · in the opinion
Dempster v. Lamorak Ins. Co. (2020)
…1096, 2016 WL 3966142, at [\6] (M.D. Fla. June 30, 2016); Yates v. Ford Motor Co., No. 12-752, 2015 WL 3463559, at [\10] (E.D.N.C. May 30, 2015). \[49\] See Dugas, No…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · September 28, 2021 · in the opinion
Krutz v. Huntington Ingalls Inc. (2021)
…testimony, fact or expert, to show that Amchem's asbestos products were a substantial factor in causing his disease. Cf. Michel v. Ford Motor Co., No. 18-4738, 2019 WL 118007, at [\3] (E.D. La…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · August 4, 2015 · in the opinion
Vedros v. Northrop Grumman Shipbuilding, Inc. (2015)
…because science has failed to establish that any specific dosage of asbestos causes injury, every exposure to asbestos should be considered a cause of injury." Yates v. Ford Motor Co., 113 F.Supp.3d 841, 846…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · March 6, 2017 · in the opinion
Bell v. Foster Wheeler Energy Corp. (2017)
…plaintiff's exposure. See Rost v. Ford Motor Co., 2016 WL 6876490, at [\8] (Pa. Nov. 22, 2016) (permitting expert opinion that "Rost's exposures to asbestos at Smith Motors were sufficiently frequent, regular, and proximate…
-
Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · April 3, 1996 · in the opinion
Held v. Avondale Industries, Inc. (1996)
…La.1990). This is true no matter how small the chances of the party opposing the motion to ultimately prevail appear to be. Dearie v. Ford Motor Co., 583 So.2d 28 (La. App. 5 Cir…