No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

78 results for “Ford Motor Company”, page 2 of 4

  1. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · July 22, 2019 · in the opinion

    Kraus v. Alcatel-Lucent (2019)

    …REILLY, REILLY JANICZEK & MCDEVITT, PC, STEPHEN SCOTT, REILLY MCDEVITT & HENRICH & SUSAN M. VALINIS, REILLY JANICZEK & MCDEVITT P.C. FORD MOTOR CO., Defendant, represented by DANIEL J. SINCLAIR, ECKERT SEAMANS CHERIN & MELLOTT LLC & ERIC L. HORNE, ECKERT…

  2. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · August 26, 2014 · in the opinion

    Gillen v. Boeing Company (2014)

    …applying Maryland law and finding no duty); In re Certified Question from Fourteenth Dist. Court of Appeals of Texas (Miller v. Ford Motor Co.), 740 N.W.2d 206, 218 (Mich. 2007) (applying Michigan law and…

  3. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · April 28, 2022 · in the opinion

    Smeal v. Clark Equipment Company (2022)

    …product caused his harm, from those in which such likelihood is absent on account of only casual or minimal exposure to the defendant's product." Rost v. Ford Motor Co., 151 A.3d 1032 (Pa. 2016) …

  4. Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · September 17, 2024 · in the opinion

    Constantine v. Lenox Instrument Company (2024)

    …present purposes. Generally speaking, motions in limine are used to preclude the presentation of evidence that a party considers inadmissible or prejudicial. See Parr v. Ford Motor Co., 109 A.3d 682, 690 (Pa. Super. 2014…

  5. Court case · U.S. Bankruptcy Court, Western District of Pennsylvania · December 16, 2015 · in the opinion

    In re All Matters Related TO North American Refractories Company (2015)

    …g., Liberty Lincoln-Mercury, Inc. v. Ford Motor Co., 562 F.3d 553, 557 (3d Cir. 2009) ("We have long held that an injury measured in solely monetary terms cannot constitute irreparable harm."). On its face…

  6. Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · February 21, 2020 · in the opinion

    Brandt v. Bon-Ton Stores, Inc. (2020)

    …regularity, and proximity such that a fact-finder may infer that the plaintiff's exposure was a substantial factor in causing her harm. Rost v. Ford Motor Co., 151 A.3d 1032, 1052-53 (Pa. 2016…

  7. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · February 16, 2011 · in the opinion

    Anderson v. Salmon Bay and Gravel Co. (In re Asbestos Products Liability Litigation, 2011)

    …Schiff, 602 F.3d 152, 172 (3d Cir. April 7, 2010) (quoting Pineda v. Ford Motor Co., 502 F.3d 237, 243-44 (3d Cir. 2008)). Defendant has not challenged the qualification of Plaintiffs' experts, so…

  8. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit · May 16, 2016 · in the opinion

    Hassell v. The Budd Co. (In re Asbestos Products Liability Lit.(no. VI), 2016)

    …SBRMCOA, LLC v. Bayside Resort, Inc., 707 F.3d 267, 272-73 (3d Cir.2013) (quoting Ford Motor Co. v. Summit Motor Prods., Inc., 930 F.2d 277, 284-85 (3d Cir. 1991)). In this case…

  9. Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · September 17, 2024 · in the opinion

    Constantine v. Lenox Instrument Co., Inc. (2024)

    …establish proximate \[or legal\] causation, a plaintiff must adduce evidence to show that the defendant's act was a substantial factor in bringing about the plaintiff's harm." Rost v. Ford Motor Co., 637 Pa. 625…

  10. Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · September 5, 2013 · in the opinion

    Nelson v. Airco Welders Supply (2013)

    …ENGINEERING, FORD MOTOR CO., FOSECO, INC., FOSTER WHEELER CORPORATION, GARLOCK, INC., GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, GENERAL MOTORS CORP., GEORGE V. HAMILTON, INC., GEORGIA-PACIFIC CORPORATION, GOULD PUMPS, INC., GREEN, TWEED & COMAPNY, INC., HAJOCA PLUMBING SUPPLY COMPANY, HARNISCHFEGER…

  11. Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · December 19, 2008 · in the opinion

    Weible v. Allied Signal, Inc. (2008)

    …KimberlyClark Corp., Walter B. Gallagher Co., Atco, Borg-Warner Corp., Columbia Boiler Co., Chrysler Corp., Ford Motor Co., General Motors Corp., Ingersoll Rand, John Crane, Inc., Maremont Corp., Pa Brake Bonding, Pneumo Abex Corp., United Gilsonite…

  12. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · August 31, 1982 · in the opinion

    Neal v. Carey Canadian Mines, Ltd. (1982)

    …paying compensatory damages rather than changing the business practice which would result in extra costs. See, e.g., Wangen v. Ford Motor Co., 97 Wis.2d 260, 294 N.W.2d 437, 451-457 (1980); Sturm…

  13. Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · April 10, 2024 · in the opinion

    Fisher v. American International Industries (2024)

    …containing product was sufficiently \frequent, regular and proximate' to support a jury's finding that \[the\] defendant's product was substantially causative of the disease." Rost v. Ford Motor Co., 151 A.3d 1032, 1044 (Pa…

  14. Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of Pennsylvania · July 21, 2020 · in the opinion

    Gorton v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2020)

    …to the claims at issue. (ECF No. 408 at 10-14.) Defendants rely on the Pennsylvania Supreme Court's decision in Rost v. Ford Motor Co., 151 A.3d 1032 (Pa. 2016), which held that "expert…

  15. Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · March 24, 2020 · in the opinion

    Schrader v. Ameron International Corporation (2020)

    …Ford Motor Co., 160 A.3d 1135 (Del. 2017) (unpublished disposition at 2017 WL 1422626 [\3]). In Walls, the decedent was exposed to asbestos from, among other sources, brake changes performed on Ford vehicles in the…

  16. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · January 25, 2012 · in the opinion

    Rabovsky v. Goulds Pumps (In re Asbestos Products Liability Litigation (NO. VI), 2012)

    …602 F.3d 152, 172 (3d Cir. April 7, 2010) (quoting Pineda v. Ford Motor Co., 502 F.3d 237, 243-44 (3d Cir. 2008)). As is the case with regard to the Federal Rules of…

  17. Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · January 25, 1991 · in the opinion

    Moran v. G. & WH Corson, Inc. (1991)

    …id., and "view trade relations realistically rather than mythically." Verge v. Ford Motor Co., 581 F.2d 384 (3rd Cir.1978). Thus in determining who may be "primarily responsible" [\125] and required to indemnify in a…

  18. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · September 25, 2019 · in the opinion

    Kraus v. Alcatel-Lucent (2019)

    …SYSTEMS/LORAL, Cross Claimant, represented by MICHAEL DAVID SMITH, GLAZIER YEE LLP & WILLIAM R. ADAMS, DICKIE MCCAMEY & CHILCOTE. FORD MOTOR CO., Cross Claimant, represented by DANIEL J. SINCLAIR, ECKERT SEAMANS CHERIN & MELLOTT LLC & ERIC L. HORNE…

  19. Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · August 5, 2014 · in the opinion

    Nelson v. Airco Welders Supply (2014)

    …Engineering, Ford Motor Co., Foseco, Inc., Foster Wheeler Corporation, Garlock, Inc., General Electric Company, General Motors Corp., George V. Hamilton, Inc., Georgia- Pacific Corporation, Gould Pumps, Inc., Green, Tweed & Company, Inc., Hajoca Plumbing Supply Company, Harnischfeger…

  20. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · July 25, 2019 · in the opinion

    Kraus v. Alcatel-Lucent (2019)

    …REILLY, REILLY JANICZEK & MCDEVITT, PC, STEPHEN SCOTT, REILLY MCDEVITT & HENRICH & SUSAN M. VALINIS, REILLY JANICZEK & MCDEVITT P.C. FORD MOTOR CO., Defendant, represented by DANIEL J. SINCLAIR, ECKERT SEAMANS CHERIN & MELLOTT LLC & ERIC L. HORNE, ECKERT…