No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

31 results for “Ford Motor Company”, page 2 of 2

  1. Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · March 2, 2021 · in the opinion

    Neely EX rel. Estate OF Goehring v. Union Carbide Corporation (2021)

    …record indicates that the Union Carbide products at issue contained chrysotile fibers, but none of the attached studies specifically looked at that type of fiber. See Yates v. Ford Motor Co., 113 F. Supp. 3d 841…

  2. Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · February 27, 2006 · in the opinion

    In re Fluor Enterprises, Inc. (2006)

    …is an extraordinary remedy, available only when a trial court clearly abuses its discretion and when there is no adequate remedy by appeal. In re Ford Motor Co., 165 S.W.3d 315, 317 (Tex.2005…

  3. Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · August 26, 2010 · in the opinion

    Georgia-Pacific Corporation v. Bostic (2010)

    …232 S.W.3d at 770 (quoting Union Pump Co. v. Allbritton, 898 S.W.2d 773, 775 (Tex. 1995)); see also Ford Motor Co. v. Ledesma, 242 S.W.3d 32, 46 (Tex. 2007). Thus…

  4. Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of Texas · September 25, 2006 · in the opinion

    Jacobs v. Tapscott (2006)

    …disclosures is just that—to supplement. Such disclosures are not intended to provide an extension of the expert designation and report production deadline." Metro Ford Truck Sales, Inc. v. Ford Motor Co., 145 F.3d 320…

  5. Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · July 31, 1992 · in the opinion

    Keene Corp. v. Gardner (1992)

    …721 S.W.2d 832, 834 (Tex. 1986); Lucas, 696 S.W.2d at 377; Ford Motor Co. v. Durrill, 714 S.W.2d 329, 337 (Tex.App.—Corpus Christi 1986), vacated and remanded for rendition…

  6. Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · June 18, 2012 · in the opinion

    Union Carbide Corporation v. Synatzske (2012)

    …evidentiary findings of the MDL pre-trial court, because they are reasonable and supported by the evidence. See Butnaru v. Ford Motor Co., 84 S.W.3d 198, 211 (Tex. 2002) (trial court does not abuse…

  7. Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · June 28, 2012 · in the opinion

    Union Carbide Corp. v. Synatzske (2012)

    …because they are reasonable and supported by the evidence. See Butnaru v. Ford Motor Co., 84 S.W.3d 198, 211 (Tex.2002) (trial court does not abuse its discretion if some evidence of substantive and…

  8. Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · March 11, 1999 · in the opinion

    North American Refractory Co. v. Easter (1999)

    …Corp. v. Valdez, 921 S.W.2d 444, 448 (Tex.App.— Corpus Christi 1996, orig. proceeding); Lone Star Ford, Inc. v. McCormick, 838 S.W.2d 734, 737 (Tex.App.—Houston \[1st Dist.\] 1992, writ denied)…

  9. Court case · Texas Supreme Court · June 8, 2007 · in the opinion

    Borg-Warner Corporation v. Flores (2007)

    …housing in doing a brake servicing/brake repair job." He described a conference on the hazards of brake repair held by Ford of Britain in 1969 and published in 1970 in the Annals of Occupational Hygiene…

  10. Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of Texas · April 12, 2007 · in the opinion

    Jacobs v. Tapscott (2007)

    …legal sufficiency of the evidence to support the verdict." Hodges v. Mack Trucks, Inc., 474 F.3d 188, 195 (5th Cir.2006) (citing Ford v. Cimarron Ins. Co., 230 F.3d 828, 830 (5th Cir.2000))…

  11. Court case · Texas Supreme Court · July 14, 1998 · in the opinion

    In re Ethyl Corp. (1998)

    …51 F.3d 1293, 1299 (7 th Cir.) (holding that the trial court abused its discretion in forcing the "defendants to stake their companies on the outcome of a single jury trial, or be forced by…