No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

57 results for “Ford Motor Company”, page 2 of 3

  1. Court case · Ohio Court of Appeals · June 3, 2010 · in the opinion

    Dean v. Bur. OF Workers'comp. (2010)

    …(2008), 176 Ohio App.3d 453, 458, 892 N.E.2d 493, 497, 2008-Ohio-2377 at ¶ 17 Snyder v. Ford Motor Co., Third Dist. No. 1-05-41, 2005-Ohio-6415, ¶ 31. As a prerequisite…

  2. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · January 5, 2015 · in the opinion

    Comardelle v. Pennsylvania General Ins. Co. (2015)

    …expert causation testimony based on the "every exposure" theory. 633 First, in Smith v. Ford Motor Co., the district court excluded Dr. Hammar's opinion that a plaintiff's exposure to brake dust caused his mesothelioma…

  3. Court case · California Court of Appeal · November 13, 1996 · in the opinion

    Hansen v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1996)

    …in light of the evidence before it. (Ford Motor Co. v. Insurance Co. of North America (1995) 35 Cal. App.4th 604, 610 \[41 Cal. Rptr.2d 342\] (Ford).) Therefore, OC bore the burden of proving…

  4. Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · June 25, 1982 · in the opinion

    Froud v. Celotex Corporation (1982)

    …as indicated by the recent single personal injury jury verdict in the amount of $127.8 million, of which $125 million was for punitive damages. (Richard Grimshaw v. Ford Motor Co., Superior Court, Santa Ana, Cal.…

  5. Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of Illinois · December 22, 2014 · in the opinion

    Krik v. Crane Co. (2014)

    …See Schultz, 721 F.3d at 432 (recognizing that such broad opinions give rise to concerns about "an ill-defined floor"); see also Smith v. Ford Motor Co., No. 2:08-cv-630, 2013 WL 214378…

  6. Court case · Illinois Supreme Court · October 21, 1999 · in the opinion

    McClure v. Owens Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1999)

    …Supp. 1031, 1037 (D.Mass.1981); Ryan v. Eli Lilly & Co., 514 F.Supp. 1004, 1016 (D.S.C.1981); Ford Motor Co. v. Wood, 119 Md.App. 1, 36, 703 A.2d 1315, 1332 (1998)…

  7. Court case · Wisconsin Court of Appeals · November 19, 2013 · in the opinion

    Lemberger v. Honeywell International, Inc. (2013)

    …309 Wis. 2d 541, 556, 749 N.W.2d 581, 589 (negligence); Austin v. Ford Motor Co., 86 Wis. 2d 628, 643, 273 N.W.2d 233, 239 (1979) (strict liability). The comparison to be made…

  8. Court case · California Court of Appeal · August 6, 2013 · in the opinion

    Klinger v. Alderete (2013)

    …Klinger, Donadio learned that Alderete was suffering from lung cancer and not mesothelioma. Donadio also stated that the decision in Campbell v. Ford Motor Co. (2012) 206 Cal.App.4th 15 (Campbell), issued on May 21…

  9. Court case · California Court of Appeal · May 12, 1998 · in the opinion

    Arena v. Owens Corning Corp. (1998)

    …in a position to exert pressure on the manufacturer to that end; the retailer's strict liability thus serves as an added incentive to safety." (Vandermark v. Ford Motor Co. (1964) 61 Cal.2d 256, 262…

  10. Court case · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas · September 30, 1996

    Blase v. Allied Signal Inc. (1996)

    Mildred Blase sued several companies after the death of her husband, Harold Blase, an auto mechanic at Bell of Pennsylvania. She claimed that working with the defendants' products, which allegedly contained asbestos, caused his lung cancer…

  11. Court case · California Court of Appeal · August 3, 1998 · in the opinion

    Scheiding v. General Motors Corp. (1998)

    …59 Cal.2d 57, 27 Cal.Rptr. 697, 377 P.2d 897, and Vandermark v. Ford Motor Co. (1964) 61 Cal.2d 256, 37 Cal.Rptr. 896, 391 P.2d 168.) Viad reasons, "Because we find…

  12. Court case · Pennsylvania Supreme Court · February 19, 2020 · in the opinion

    Roverano v. John Crane, Inc. (2020)

    …actual, product-specific causation in many asbestos cases, the courts have come to accept abstract assessments of increased risk as proxies for traditional substantial-factor causation. See Rost v. Ford Motor Co., 637 Pa. 625, 668…

  13. Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · May 9, 1991 · in the opinion

    Wehmeier v. Unr Industries, Inc. (1991)

    …Fetzer Co. v. Dile (9th Cir.1981), 643 F.2d 670; Smith v. Ford Motor Co. (10th Cir.1980), 626 F.2d 784.) In Scott, the lower court permitted plaintiff, through previous undisclosed witnesses, to advance…

  14. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit · August 31, 2017 · in the opinion

    Krik v. Exxon Mobil Corp. (2017)

    …1992); United States v. Dixon, 413 F.3d 520, 524-25 (5th Cir. 2005); Yates v. Ford Motor Co., 113 F.Supp.3d 841, 862 (E.D.N.C. 2015); Betz v. Pneumo Abex, LLC, 615…

  15. Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Illinois · August 31, 2015 · in the opinion

    Bell v. Abb Group, Inc. (2015)

    …806 (7th Cir. 2013) (Daubert "remains the gold standard for evaluating the reliability of expert testimony."). The Seventh Circuit's Opinion in Smith v. Ford Motor Co., 215 F.3d 713 (7th Cir. 2000) provides the…

  16. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · February 1, 2021 · in the opinion

    Hulin v. Huntington Ingalls, Inc. (2021)

    …testimony, fact or expert, to show that AmChem's asbestos products were a substantial factor in causing his lung cancer. Cf. Michel v. Ford Motor Co., No. 18-4738, 2019 WL 118007, at [\3] (E.D…

  17. Court case · Tennessee Supreme Court · July 1, 2015 · in the opinion

    Payne v. CSX Transportation, Inc. (2015)

    …thirteenth juror. See Meals ex rel. Meals v. Ford Motor Co., 417 S.W.3d 414, 420 (Tenn.2013) ("No verdict is valid unless approved by the trial judge acting as the thirteenth juror."). When a…

  18. Court case · California Supreme Court · July 3, 1980 · in the opinion

    Johns-Manville Products Corp. v. Superior Court (1980)

    …Co. v. Ind. Acc. Com. (1952) 39 Cal.2d 529, 532-533 \[247 P.2d 707\]; Dixon v. Ford Motor Co. (1975) 53 Cal. App.3d 499, 503, 504-507 \[125 Cal. Rptr. 872\]; Wickham v…

  19. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit · August 17, 1998 · in the opinion

    Cimino v. Raymark Industries, Inc. (1998)

    …we are not persuaded that reversible error has been demonstrated or that manifest injustice would result by allowing the verdict to stand. See Johnson v. Ford Motor Co., 988 F.2d 573, 582 (5th Cir.1993)…

  20. Court case · Ohio Court of Appeals · November 30, 2015 · in the opinion

    Bryant v. General Motors Corp. (2015)

    …husband contracted and died from an occupational disease as a result of an injurious exposure to asbestos in the course of and arising out of his employment. See Snyder v. Ford Motor Co., 3d Dist. No…