No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

40 results for “Ford Motor Company”, page 2 of 2

  1. Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · March 24, 2020 · in the opinion

    Schrader v. Ameron International Corporation (2020)

    …Ford Motor Co., 160 A.3d 1135 (Del. 2017) (unpublished disposition at 2017 WL 1422626 [\3]). In Walls, the decedent was exposed to asbestos from, among other sources, brake changes performed on Ford vehicles in the…

  2. Court case · California Court of Appeal · November 17, 2009 · in the opinion

    Merrill v. Leslie Controls, Inc. (2009)

    …which makes them better able to insure that the component is suitable for their specific applications. (Springmeyer v. Ford Motor Co. (1998) 60 Cal.App.4th 1541, 1554 \[71 Cal.Rptr.2d 190\].) Liability of a…

  3. Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · June 26, 2017 · in the opinion

    Rublee v. Carrier Corporation (2017)

    …466, 472, 804 P.2d 659 (1991); RCW 4.22.920. \[22\] Ulmer v. Ford Motor Co., 75 Wn.2d 522, 452 P.2d 729 (1969) (applying § 402A strict product liability to manufacturers); Seattle-First Nat…

  4. Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · June 26, 2016 · in the opinion

    Rublee v. Carrier Corp. (2016)

    …466, 472, 804 P.2d 659 (1991); RCW 4.22.920. \[22\] Ulmer v. Ford Motor Co., 75 Wash.2d 522, 452 P.2d 729 (1969) (applying § 402A strict product liability to manufacturers); Seattle-First Nat…

  5. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · January 25, 2012 · in the opinion

    Rabovsky v. Goulds Pumps (In re Asbestos Products Liability Litigation (NO. VI), 2012)

    …602 F.3d 152, 172 (3d Cir. April 7, 2010) (quoting Pineda v. Ford Motor Co., 502 F.3d 237, 243-44 (3d Cir. 2008)). As is the case with regard to the Federal Rules of…

  6. Court case · California Court of Appeal · May 12, 1998 · in the opinion

    Arena v. Owens Corning Corp. (1998)

    …in a position to exert pressure on the manufacturer to that end; the retailer's strict liability thus serves as an added incentive to safety." (Vandermark v. Ford Motor Co. (1964) 61 Cal.2d 256, 262…

  7. Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · November 18, 1993 · in the opinion

    Srite v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1993)

    …unpersuaded by plaintiffs' argument. The zero damages rule conflicts with the standard of review articulated by the Texas Supreme Court in the case of Pool v. Ford Motor Co., 715 S.W.2d 629, 635 (Tex…

  8. Court case · California Court of Appeal · August 3, 1998 · in the opinion

    Scheiding v. General Motors Corp. (1998)

    …59 Cal.2d 57, 27 Cal.Rptr. 697, 377 P.2d 897, and Vandermark v. Ford Motor Co. (1964) 61 Cal.2d 256, 37 Cal.Rptr. 896, 391 P.2d 168.) Viad reasons, "Because we find…

  9. Court case · Maryland Court of Appeals · October 11, 1996 · in the opinion

    ACandS Inc. v. Asner (1996)

    …al. No. 92, Sept. Term 1995. October 11, 1996. Opinion Denying Reconsideration December 6, 1996. Court of Appeals of Maryland. [\252] B. Ford Davis (Dwight W. Stone, II, Whiteford, Taylor & Preston, L.L.P., on brief…

  10. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Maine · September 16, 2020 · in the opinion

    Coffin v. Ametek, Inc. (2020)

    …2018 WL 3819027, at [\16] (W.D. Wash. Aug. 10, 2018) (quoting Rost v. Ford Motor Co., 151 A.3d 1032, 1045 (Pa. 2016)). Nevertheless, as the court in Jack explained, "\[t\]hese \irrefutable scientific fact…

  11. Court case · Missouri Court of Appeals · May 2, 2017 · in the opinion

    Poage v. Crane Co. (2017)

    …a design defect when, "a design is itself inadequate, rendering the product unreasonably dangerous without regard to whether a warning is given\[.\]" Moore v. Ford Motor Co., 332 S.W.3d 749, 757 (Mo. banc 2011)…

  12. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · August 19, 2016 · in the opinion

    Hillyer v. Mine Safety Appliances Co. (In re Asbestos Litigation, 2016)

    …Cross Defendant, represented by Eileen M. Ford, Marks, O'Neill, O'Brien, Doherty & Kelly, P.C. & Megan Trocki Mantzavinos, Marks, O'Neill, O'Brien, Doherty & Kelly, P.C.. Mine Safety Appliances Company, Cross Defendant, represented by…

  13. Court case · Tennessee Court of Appeals · June 30, 2015 · in the opinion

    Russell v. Illinois Central Railroad Company (2015)

    …Cir. 1987); Muzzleman v. Nat. Rail Passenger Corp., 839 F.Supp. 1094, 1096-1097 (D.Del. 1993); Ford v. Nat. R. Passenger Corp., 734 F.Supp. 215 (D.Md.1990); Lyons v. Southern Pacific Transp. Co.…

  14. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · July 28, 2016 · in the opinion

    Hillyer v. ABB (In re Asbestos Litigation Hillyer, 2016)

    …Cross Defendant, represented by Eileen M. Ford, Marks, O'Neill, O'Brien, Doherty & Kelly, P.C. & Megan Trocki Mantzavinos, Marks, O'Neill, O'Brien, Doherty & Kelly, P.C.. Mine Safety Appliances Company, Cross Defendant, represented by…

  15. Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · April 27, 1995 · in the opinion

    ACandS, Inc. v. Asner (1995)

    …C. Petersen, Padraic McSherry Morton and Whiteford, Taylor & Preston, on the brief), Baltimore, for appellant, Porter Hayden Co. B. Ford Davis (Dwight W. Stone, II and Whiteford, Taylor & Preston, on the brief), Baltimore, for appellant, ACandS…

  16. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · August 9, 2016 · in the opinion

    Winhauer v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2016)

    …Defendant, represented by Eileen M. Ford, Marks, O'Neill, O'Brien, Doherty & Kelly, P.C. & Megan Trocki Mantzavinos, Marks, O'Neill, O'Brien, Doherty & Kelly, P.C.. Ingersoll Rand Company, Defendant, represented by Jessica Lee Tyler…

  17. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · February 13, 2019 · in the opinion

    Johansen v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2019)

    …A. Costello, Morgan Lewis & Bockius LLP. IMO Industries, Inc., Defendant, represented by Eileen M. Ford, Marks, O'Neill, O'Brien, Doherty & Kelly, P.C. The Fairbanks Company, Defendant, represented by Timothy A. Sullivan, III, Wilbraham, Lawler…

  18. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · July 13, 2016 · in the opinion

    Winhauer v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2016)

    …Defendant, represented by Eileen M. Ford, Marks, O'Neill, O'Brien, Doherty & Kelly, P.C. & Megan Trocki Mantzavinos, Marks, O'Neill, O'Brien, Doherty & Kelly, P.C.. Ingersoll Rand Company, Defendant, represented by Jessica Lee Tyler…

  19. Court case · California Court of Appeal · July 24, 2013 · in the opinion

    Keeney v. AW Chesterton Company (2013)

    … thus, it must be claimed and may be waived \[citation\]."\]; People v. Ford (1988) 45 Cal.3d 431, 439 \["The privilege against self-incrimination is, of course, personal and may be asserted only by the holder…

  20. Court case · Wisconsin Court of Appeals · January 27, 2015 · in the opinion

    Peter v. Sprinkmann Sons Corp. (2015)

    …claim because: (1) the damages exception in § 893.89(4)(d), allowing claims for "\[d\]amages that were sustained before April 29, 1994" applies because Donald's exposure to asbestos occurred long before April 29, 1994…