34 results for “General Electric”, page 2 of 2
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Connecticut · July 16, 2002 · in the opinion
Yale University v. Cigna Ins. Co. (2002)
…In that case, the court concluded that repair and replacement costs incurred by the insured on account of damage to electrical transformers caused by a design defect were not "ensuing losses." Id. In support of its…
-
Court case · Connecticut Appellate Court · March 30, 2016 · in the opinion
RT Vanderbilt Co. v. Hartford Acc. & Indem. (2016)
…that\] would lie between arduous and Sisyphean." That commentary, however, was made not with respect to the general retroactive application of allocation rules but, rather, in the specific context of the court's determination that the…
-
Court case · Connecticut Supreme Court · March 29, 2016 · in the opinion
Estate OF Rock v. University of Connecticut (2016)
…is whether the plaintiff, Estate of James Rock, has standing under the Workers' Compensation Act (act), General Statutes § 31-275 et seq., to seek benefits for temporary total disability and permanent partial disability, as well as…
-
Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit · February 21, 1996 · in the opinion
BellSouth Telecommunications v. WR Grace (1996)
…were merely higher-than-expected maintenance costs resulting from the failure of the Monokote fireproofing to meet the "general purposes for which it was manufactured and sold," and hence did not give rise to an actionable…
-
Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit · February 18, 2016
Brown v. Lockheed Martin Corp. (2016)
…of the estate's asbestos claims against Lockheed Martin for lack of personal jurisdiction in Connecticut. A corporation is not subject to general jurisdiction merely because it has substantial but small-share contacts with a state…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Connecticut · September 18, 2008 · in the opinion
Pantalone v. Aurora Pump Co. (2008)
…and which were purportedly critical to the removal determination), Buffalo Pumps instead proffered its factual basis for removal in broad, general terms. According to the notice, Buffalo Pumps had satisfied the statutory requirements for removal during…
-
Court case · Connecticut Supreme Court · April 5, 2017 · in the opinion
Bagley v. Adel Wiggins Group (2017)
\[12\] "Common knowledge is limited, however, to those well substantiated facts that are obvious to the general community." State v. Padua, 273 Conn. 138, 193, 869 A.2d 192 (2005) (Katz, J., dissenting and concurring). Common…
-
Court case · Connecticut Supreme Court · March 28, 2019 · in the opinion
RT Vanderbilt Company, Inc. v. Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company (2019)
…and accidental" exception to pollution exclusion was intended to preclude coverage for gradually occurring pollution, "so that only a temporally abrupt release of pollutants would be covered as an exception to the general pollution exclusion"). Indeed…
-
Court case · Connecticut Supreme Court · August 12, 2008 · in the opinion
Deschenes v. Transco, Inc. (2008)
…the previous disability and the second injury which is materially and substantially greater than the disability that would have resulted from the second injury alone," which would have entitled him to full compensation under General Statutes …
-
Court case · Connecticut Supreme Court · November 27, 2007 · in the opinion
Deschenes v. Transco, Inc. (2007)
…the previous disability and the second injury which is materially and substantially greater than the disability that would have resulted from the second injury alone," which would have entitled him to full compensation under General Statutes …
-
Court case · Connecticut Appellate Court · January 6, 2016 · in the opinion
Martin Franchises, Inc. v. Cooper US, Inc. (2016)
…Furthermore, the defendant pleaded two special defenses, the first of which was that the plaintiff's claim was barred by the statute of limitations set forth in General Statutes § 52-576, and the second of which…
-
Court case · Connecticut Appellate Court · October 13, 2021 · in the opinion
Poce v. O & G Industries, Inc. (2021)
…whereby the plaintiff sought a determination as to which of its general liability insurance carriers were obligated to defend and indemnify the claims against it in light of multiple lawsuits alleging injuries from exposure to asbestos…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Connecticut · June 7, 1984 · in the opinion
Bauer v. Johns-Manville Corp. (1984)
…the plaintiff has cited a number of cases stating the general rule regarding retroactive application of statutes of limitation: statutes of limitation are ordinarily considered procedural and are retroactively applied to actions pending on or brought…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Connecticut · July 15, 2024 · in the opinion
In re Nash Engineering Company (2024)
…incurring of debt, onset of financial difficulties, or pendency or threat of suits by creditors; and (6) the general chronology of the events and transactions under inquiry. In re Anderson, 623 B.R. 199, 213-14…