112 results for “General Electric”, page 2 of 6
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of Illinois · March 6, 2014 · in the opinion
Smith v. AW Chesterton Company (2014)
…INC.; SPIRAX SARCO, INC.; GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY; CBS CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation, f/k/a Viacom Inc., successor by merger to CBS Corporation, a Pennsylvania Corporation, f/k/a Westinghouse Electric Corporation; FLOWSERVE US, INC. a…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Illinois · April 20, 2012 · in the opinion
Ruppel v. AO Smith Corporation (2012)
…Pumps and Peerless Pumps; Foster Wheeler Energy Corp., individually and as successor-in-interest to C.H. Wheeler; Garden Denver, Inc.; General Electric Co.; Georgia-Pacific, LLC; Goulds Pumps, Inc.; Honeywell International Inc., as successor-in…
-
Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · September 18, 2013 · in the opinion
Gillenwater v. Honeywell Intern., Inc. (2013)
…participate in the conspiracy. Id. If, after resigning from General Electric, Naples had come clean and reported the conspiracy to authorities, the conspiracy — which he had helped to arrange — would have been thwarted. In the government…
-
Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · May 17, 2024 · in the opinion
Ramirez v. Avon Products, Inc. (2024)
…This consideration is addressed in Cholipski, which discussed Laue and our supreme court's later decision in Cook v. General Electric Company, 146 Ill 2d 548 (1992), which made clear that while contribution claims must be…
-
Court case · Illinois Supreme Court · December 19, 2019 · in the opinion
Jones v. Pneumo Abex LLC (2019)
…Texas, L.P.; Draco Mechanical Supply, Inc.; Duro Dyne Corporation; Foster Wheeler Energy Corporation; General Electric Company; General Gasket Corporation; General Refractories Co.; Georgia Pacific Corporation; The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company; Homasote Company; Honeywell International, Inc.…
-
Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · December 16, 2014
Holloway v. Sprinkmann Sons Corporation (2014)
…for a new trial. A general defense verdict is not against the manifest weight of the evidence where the proof that the plaintiff's exposure was enough to cause her asbestosis was speculative. Causation; Trial Procedure…
-
Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · September 30, 2011 · in the opinion
Zickuhr v. Ericsson, Inc. (2011)
…health risks. Lageman holds a bachelor of science degree in electrical engineering from Johns Hopkins University and worked closely with defendant's cable and wire as he transitioned through the positions of specifications engineer, product engineer…
-
Court case · Illinois Supreme Court · October 25, 1989 · in the opinion
Board of Education v. A, C & S, Inc. (1989)
…the defendant (Sawyer, 89 Ill.2d at 384 (real estate brokers must follow the regulations created by the Department of Registration and Education); Heimgaertner v. Benjamin Electric Manufacturing Co. (1955), 6 Ill.2d 152, 153-54 …
-
Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · July 24, 1979 · in the opinion
Nolan v. Johns-Manville Asbestos & Magnesia Materials Co. (1979)
…defective product. See Urie v. Thompson, 337 U.S. 163, 69 S.Ct. 1018, 11 A.L.R.2d 252; Sylvania Electric Products, Inc. v. Barker, 228 F.2d 842; Brush Beryllium Co. v. Meckley, 284…
-
Court case · Illinois Supreme Court · March 22, 2012 · in the opinion
Simpkins v. CSX Transp., Inc. (2012)
…a matter of law. See, e.g., Martin v. Cincinnati Gas & Electric Co., 561 F.3d 439, 445 (6th Cir.2009); In re Certified Question From the Fourteenth District Court of Appeals of Texas, 479 Mich…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of Illinois · October 22, 2013 · in the opinion
Stanley v. Ameren Illinois Co. (2013)
… and decreasing the operating costs of the plant. It is not necessary to the processes that create electricity, but it is required for efficiency and safety in the operation of a power plant. During the construction…
-
Court case · Illinois Supreme Court · October 25, 1983 · in the opinion
Froud v. Celotex Corp. (1983)
…2d 199, 214-15, 90 S.Ct. 1583, 1595-96 (Black, J., dissenting); General Dynamics Corp., Electric Boat Division, v. Benefits Review Board (2d Cir.1977), 565 F.2d 208, 212; Williams v. Ray (1978), 146…
-
Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · March 18, 1993 · in the opinion
Campbell v. AC Equipment Services Corporation, Inc. (1993)
…TGM, alleged they were employed by TGM to perform work for A.C. Equipment and Springfield's City Water, Light and Power Division at an electricity generating station known as Lakeside Two. A.C. Equipment, a…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of Illinois · May 19, 2014
Horrie v. AW Chesterton Company (2014)
…as contracts or Navy warning requirements, that the government controlled the warnings and that this conflicted with state law. Crane's general affidavits did not do so. Failure to Warn; Government Contractor Defense and Removal; Venue…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of Illinois · January 31, 2024
Pelton v. John Crane, Inc. (2024)
…may seek punitive damages. Under maritime law, a plaintiff may show substantial-factor causation through admissible general expert testimony plus circumstantial evidence of substantial exposure over a substantial period, without expert testimony specific to the defendant…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of Illinois · March 23, 2017
John Crane, Inc. v. Simon Greenstone Panatier Bartlett, Apc (2017)
…states and the only Illinois contacts were discovery responses and communications sent to the plaintiff there. Under the general venue statute, a plaintiff's receipt of such papers and its economic harm in the district do…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of Illinois · November 23, 2021
Johnson v. Orton (2021)
…Circuit's Krik decision. It limited Monona Rossol to ceramics, as agreed. It limited Dr. Barry Castleman to general historical testimony, barring opinions on Vanderbilt's knowledge, motives or lobbying. It allowed Dr. William Longo's…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Illinois · April 9, 2014
Hasenberg v. Air & Liquid Systems Corp. (2014)
…not make clear which defendants were sued in which counts, the court dismissed it without prejudice and ordered an amended complaint by May 9, 2014. It also noted general personal jurisdiction standards for a later motion.
-
Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · July 15, 2011 · in the opinion
Rodarmel v. Pneumo Abex, LLC (2011)
DR. MURPHY: On general principles. You know you can produce a fibrosis, and the possibility of occasional cancer must also come into the picture. But I don't believe that this information would be of any…
-
Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · May 27, 1986 · in the opinion
Zurich Ins. Co. v. Raymark Industries, Inc. (1986)
Waters testified that in the 1940's, comprehensive general-liability policies were sold for a period of either one year or three years, and that during that time period all original policies were sequentially numbered and…