41 results for “General Electric”, page 2 of 3
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Kentucky · September 30, 2021 · in the opinion
Papineau v. Brake Supply Company, Inc. (2021)
…the equipment's wheel, Mr. Papineau would remove the brake drum, clean it with compressed air and an electric grinder, and then remove the brake shoe using a hammer or hydraulics. Id. at 58:3-15…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Kentucky · November 17, 2015 · in the opinion
Stallings v. Georgia-Pacific Corporation (2015)
…526 U.S. 137, 147-49 (1999) (applying Daubert's general principles to the expert matters discussed in Rule 702). First, the Court must determine "whether the experts' testimony reflects \scientific knowledge,' whether their findings are…
-
Court case · Kentucky Court of Appeals · January 29, 2021 · in the opinion
Hayes v. Colgate-Palmolive Company (2021)
…its corporate state of mind for purposes of punitive damages. But, apart from citing caselaw delineating the general standard for admitting or excluding evidence, its argument was premised upon little more; namely: (1) a broad reference…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Kentucky · December 21, 2012
Bruszewski v. Motley Rice, LLC (2012)
…allow recovery of "lost" punitive damages in a legal malpractice action. Statute of Limitations; Punitive Damages; Asbestos Trust Claims in Court; Choice of Law; Loss of Consortium Worksites: General Motors employee of General Motors General Motors
-
Court case · Kentucky Court of Appeals · July 30, 2004
Clephas v. Garlock, Inc. (2004)
…testified that Charles had no asbestosis and no asbestos-caused condition. Garlock's pre-trial disclosure of him was only a general statement of subjects, and he was never made available for deposition despite a court…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Kentucky · April 23, 2013
Holland v. Union Carbide Corporation (2013)
…so the plaintiff's claims against it continue. A defendant asserting the military contractor (government contractor) defense bears the burden of proving it, and general federal oversight of a plant, without proof of approved precise specifications…
-
Court case · Kentucky Court of Appeals · October 7, 2011 · in the opinion
Rehm v. Ford Motor Company (2011)
…Daubert rubric." Id. Dr. Morgan reviewed two articles detailing studies which had concluded that elevator mechanics carry a greater risk of developing asbestos-related diseases than the general population. He further recounted that it was established…
-
Court case · Kentucky Court of Appeals · April 1, 2005 · in the opinion
Parker v. Henry A. Petter Supply Co. (2005)
…Mine and Mill Supply's liability and that Parker could have pursued IRECO as a defendant. The general rule regarding liability of a corporate successor in Kentucky is that a purchasing corporation does not assume liability…
-
Court case · Kentucky Court of Appeals · February 14, 2014 · in the opinion
McGuire v. Lorillard Tobacco Company (2014)
…been a strictly personal choice, yet it was a thing of comfort and convenience to himself while he was serving as maintenance man and general custodian and while he was on call at all hours. Therefore…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Kentucky · July 19, 2024 · in the opinion
Brewer v. Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. (2024)
…However, in its Reply, BOC states that a paralegal with its attorney's office spoke by telephone with KBWC's General Counsel and was informed that, in a civil matter, the KBWC would reject a subpoena…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Kentucky · May 6, 2022 · in the opinion
Papineau v. Brake Supply Company, Inc. (2022)
…Corp. v. Woodson, 444 U.S. 286, 291, 297 (1980). The Due Process Clause allows for two types of personal jurisdiction: general and specific. Goodyear Dunlop Tires Operations, S.A. v. Brown, 564 U.S. 915…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Kentucky · December 9, 2020 · in the opinion
Papineau v. Brake Supply Company, Inc. (2020)
…Topic 2 is overly broad and confusing because it makes a general request for "\[t\]he contents of all documents and declarations submitted by or on behalf of Fras-le SA in connection with this matter…
-
Court case · Kentucky Court of Appeals · June 2, 2017 · in the opinion
Landreth v. Brake Supply Company, Inc. (2017)
…however, must be reasonable, that is they must "indicate the probable, as distinguished from a possible cause." Briner v. General Motors Corporation, Ky., 461 S.W.2d 99, 101 (1970). Id. at 872-73. More recently…
-
Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit · April 23, 1998 · in the opinion
Strickland v. Owens Corning (1998)
…there was no evidence that Kaylo distributed by Defendant, or even Kaylo in general, accounted for most of Hagan's exposure to asbestos during that period or any period. It is clear that Owens Corning was…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Kentucky · November 13, 2020 · in the opinion
Papineau v. Brake Supply Company (2020)
…information." Id. at [\2] (cleaned up). "If a Plaintiff's affidavit makes only general and conclusory statements regarding the need for more discovery, then denial of their request for more discovery is proper." Id. (cleaned up…
-
Court case · Kentucky Supreme Court · May 20, 2010 · in the opinion
Sunbeam Corporation v. Dortch (2010)
…B.R. 268 (Bankr. D. N.J. 1984) address claims that fall within exceptions to the general rule of concurrent state court jurisdiction. Those exceptions do not apply here. In the third, In re Comer, 723…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Kentucky · October 26, 2017 · in the opinion
Surita v. Arvinmeritor, Inc. (2017)
…supplies to support the 82nd and 101st Airborne Divisions. \[Id. at 100:8-16.\] She was also responsible for general maintenance of her truck and trailers, including changing flat tires and working on the brakes. \[Id…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Kentucky · April 2, 2021 · in the opinion
Papineau v. Brake Supply Company, Inc. (2021)
…made in discovery, and the reality that all anticipated jury trials have faced delays due to the global coronavirus pandemic, see General Order 21-08 (continuing all jury trials through April 30, 2021), the Court does…
-
Court case · Kentucky Supreme Court · June 17, 2021 · in the opinion
Sheets v. Ford Motor Co. (2021)
…Act. KRS 342.690 includes no such provision. This stands in stark contrast to other instances in which our General Assembly has expressly provided for a right to an immediate appeal in certain situations. Some examples…
-
Court case · Kentucky Supreme Court · April 10, 1979 · in the opinion
Louisville Trust Co. v. Johns-Manville Products (1979)
…to run. The rule of Tomlinson is an exception to the general rule with its limitation being limited to malpractice cases.\[5\] The extent of the application of Tomlinson was irrelevant to the decision. It was…