48 results for “General Electric”, page 2 of 3
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Wisconsin · January 7, 2016 · in the opinion
Ahnert v. Employers Insurance Company OF Wausau (2016)
…of Daniel Ahnert, Deceased, Plaintiff, v. EMPLOYERS INSURANCE COMPANY OF WAUSAU, PABST BREWING COMPANY, SPRINKMANN SONS CORPORATION, WISCONSIN ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY, Defendants. Case No. 13-C-1456. January 7, 2016. United States District Court, E.D…
-
Exposure sites · Wisconsin
Wisconsin Asbestos Exposure Sites: Worksites, Industries, and Trust Coverage
…brewery, the worksite most trusts recognize in the state, the Allis-Chalmers works, and Wisconsin Electric's Oak Creek power plant; the Fox River Valley — Kimberly-Clark's Neenah mills, Thilmany Pulp & Paper at Kaukauna, and…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Wisconsin · January 5, 2016 · in the opinion
Ahnert v. Employers Insurance Company OF Wausau (2016)
…general report at 21-22.) Sheet packings that were used to make certain gaskets contain 30-50% asbestos. (Pl.'s Ex. 7, general report at 25.) James Herian, a former Wisconsin Electric Power Company (WEPCO) rigger…
-
Court case · Wisconsin Supreme Court · July 20, 2010 · in the opinion
Tatera v. FMC Corp. (2010)
…Thompson's estate argued that it was permitted to bring an action in tort against Jump River, despite the principal employer's general non-liability, on the grounds that Jump River committed affirmative acts of negligence…
-
Court case · Wisconsin Court of Appeals · July 8, 2022 · in the opinion
Pepsi-Cola v. Employers Ins. Co. (2022)
…was filed by Robert Gilbert of Latham & Watkins, LLP of Boston, Massachusetts, for Wisconsin Manufacturing & Commerce and Emerson Electric Company. A nonparty brief was filed by James A. Friedman of Godfrey & Kahn, S.C. of Madison…
-
Court case · Wisconsin Court of Appeals · May 21, 2002 · in the opinion
Anderson v. Combustion Engineering, Inc. (2002)
…I. ¶ 2. Jerold Anderson worked for many years as a machinist for the Wisconsin Electric Power Company at its Oak Creek power plant. There were eight coal-fired boilers at the plant during this time. The…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Wisconsin · June 9, 2015 · in the opinion
Nuutinen v. CBS Corporation (2015)
…Nuutinen during a shutdown in the early 70's, Vohs saw insulators in their general area remove an asbestos blanket from a flange bolting to the turbine. Removable insulation can be taken off and reused without…
-
Court case · Wisconsin Court of Appeals · May 12, 2009 · in the opinion
Tatera v. FMC Corp. (2009)
…Mulhern, the court noted that the "stream of commerce" requirement is consistent with the application of § 402A in Wisconsin, citing Barter v. General Motors Corp., 70 Wis.2d 796, 235 N.W.2d 523 (1975). Mulhern…
-
State law · Wisconsin
Wisconsin Mesothelioma Lawyer: Asbestos Claims, Deadlines & Compensation
…VA benefits. What if I worked at Fort McCoy, Volk Field, or General Mitchell Air National Guard Base? Federal civilian employees there are covered by FECA, which must be repaid from any recovery against a manufacturer…
-
Court case · Wisconsin Court of Appeals · November 19, 2013
Lemberger v. Honeywell International, Inc. (2013)
Colleen Lemberger sued Honeywell and other companies for the wrongful death of her husband Steven. As a young man he worked about a year as a parts driver at an auto parts store in Milwaukee, where the job allegedly involved shaping…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Wisconsin · March 7, 2016
Pecher v. Weyerhaeuser Company (2016)
…while evidence of occupational exposure and workers' compensation is limited or kept out of the liability phase. General, unspecific requests to exclude expert testimony or untimely evidence are denied without prejudice to specific objections. Expert Testimony…
-
Court case · Wisconsin Supreme Court · March 13, 2008 · in the opinion
State v. Harenda Enterprises, Inc. (2008)
…by Jeffrey M. Gabrysiak, assistant attorney general, with whom on the briefs was also J.B. Van Hollen, attorney general. For the defendant-appellant there was a brief by Mark W. Rattan and Litchfield Cavo, Brookfield…
-
Court case · Wisconsin Court of Appeals · March 17, 2015 · in the opinion
Calewarts v. CR Meyer & Sons Company (2015)
…However, being able to provide a general description of a substance's appearance does not provide a basis for testifying to the substance's chemical or mineral composition. Calewarts also argues the coworkers' extensive experience using…
-
Court case · Wisconsin Court of Appeals · January 18, 2012 · in the opinion
Singer v. Pneumo Abex, LLC. (2012)
…product was ever, at any time, delivered to the National Avenue plant in general or to Building 35 in particular; • Any of Abex's brake shoes were ever present at the National Avenue plant, nor specifically…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Wisconsin · January 14, 2000 · in the opinion
Sybron Transition v. Security Ins. Co. of Hartford (2000)
…may be considered mutually exclusively rather than seriatim. The Olin court started with the proposition that under a general comprehensive liability insurance policy construed pursuant to New York law, the insurer is normally liable only for…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Wisconsin · June 23, 2014 · in the opinion
Miller v. American Art Clay Co. Inc. (2014)
…clay, which was consistent with AMACO packaging, but too general to help specify which specific AMACO clay Miller used. Neither Jane nor Cary recalled any writing on the packaging besides the name "AMACO." Jane testified that…
-
Court case · Wisconsin Supreme Court · October 27, 1999 · in the opinion
Sopha v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1999)
…Wisconsin would not turn a deaf ear to argument that in a particular sort of case the policy reasons [\236] for allowing an exception override the policy reasons for applying the general rule. 236 Patzer v…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Wisconsin · January 9, 1981 · in the opinion
Neubauer v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas (1981)
…one of the occasional hardships necessarily incident to a law arbitrarily making legal remedies contingent on mere lapse of time.'"' (Emphasis added.)" Applying the general rules set forth above on interpretation of Wisconsin statutes of limitations…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Wisconsin · September 9, 2015 · in the opinion
Suoja v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (2015)
…so waiver is not an issue. "Wisconsin courts apply the following general rule \[to determine whether issue preclusion applies\]: \When an issue of fact or law is actually litigated and determined by a valid and final…
-
Court case · Wisconsin Court of Appeals · September 25, 2001 · in the opinion
International Paper Co. v. Labour & Indus. Rev. Com'n (2001)
…9. In this case, neither party specifically addresses whether and to what extent these four factors have been established. Our general review of the case suggests that factors one, three and four are satisfied. Furthermore, it…