No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

44 results for “General Electric”, page 2 of 3

  1. Court case · California Court of Appeal · December 14, 1983

    Skip Fordyce, Inc. v. Workers'comp. Appeals BD. (1983)

    …and multiple-level hearsay from a doctor's report, a general pamphlet and an unsupported 'admission' that brake linings contain asbestos does not supply it. Medical opinions based on statistical studies can be substantial evidence of…

  2. Court case · South Carolina Court of Appeals · August 3, 2022 · in the opinion

    Edwards v. Scapa Waycross, Inc. (2022)

    …814 (D.S.C. 2011)). "General causation \is generally not an issue in asbestos litigation' due to the parties' acknowledgment that exposure to asbestos causes mesothelioma." Id. at 625, 869 S.E.2d at 829 (quoting…

  3. Court case · Pennsylvania Supreme Court · September 19, 1973 · in the opinion

    Utter et al. v. Asten-Hill Mfg. Co. (1973)

    …exposed, in this industry, as he might very well be, to the common cold and that it is peculiar to the industry and not common to the general public." 203 Pa. Superior Ct. at 462, 201…

  4. Court case · Oregon Court of Appeals · April 10, 2013

    Greer v. Ace Hardware Corporation (2013)

    …summary judgment, the plaintiff must produce evidence identifying a specific asbestos-containing product the defendant made or supplied and to which the plaintiff was exposed; general assertions that "some" products contained asbestos, or guesswork, are not…

  5. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit · January 15, 2014 · in the opinion

    Estate of Barabin v. AstenJohnson, Inc. (2014)

    …review and publication; 3) the known or potential error rate of the theory or technique; and 4) whether the theory or technique enjoys general acceptance within the relevant scientific community." United States v. Hankey, 203 F…

  6. Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · July 18, 2007 · in the opinion

    Bugosh v. Allen Refractories Company (2007)

    …applicable. ¶ 28 The doctrine of judicial estoppel holds that "\[a\]s a general rule, a party to an action is estopped from assuming a position inconsistent with his or her assertion in a previous action, if…

  7. Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · August 13, 1993 · in the opinion

    Kurrack v. American Dist. Telegraph Co. (1993)

    …asbestos paper was, in fact, the relevant product. Furthermore, as plaintiff correctly notes, interrogatories are properly given when they can serve as a check on the general verdict. (Saldana v. Wirtz Cartage Co. (1977), 55 Ill…

  8. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit · November 16, 2012 · in the opinion

    Barabin v. AstenJohnson, Inc. (2012)

    …recognize an impeachment exception to the collateral source rule, but relied only on the "well-established" general rule. Because there appear to be good grounds to recognize an impeachment exception to the Washington collateral source rule…

  9. Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Alabama · August 30, 2013 · in the opinion

    Morgan v. Bill Vann Company, Inc. (2013)

    …other defendants after May 19, 1979. But applicable law imposes on plaintiff the burden of proving exposure to each particular defendant's products, not just proving exposure to asbestos in general. See, e.g., Hoffman v…

  10. Court case · New York Supreme Court · April 9, 2019 · in the opinion

    Jackson v. CertainTeed Corp. (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2019)

    …he used them. (id. at 524:22-527:25). He stated a general belief that the shingles contained asbestos because, essentially, all such products in the industry did at that time (see id. at 533:6…

  11. Court case · U.S. District Court, Central District of California · July 3, 2013 · in the opinion

    Lund v. 3M Company (2013)

    …Inc., 223 F.3d 1082, 1086 (9th Cir. 2000)). Factors taken into account when analyzing general jurisdiction include whether the defendant "makes sales, solicits, or engages in business in the state, serves the state's markets…

  12. Court case · New York Supreme Court · February 4, 2021 · in the opinion

    Love v. Aerco Intl., Inc. (2021)

    …exposure to a toxin; (2) that the toxin is capable of causing the particular illness, or "general causation"; and (3) that plaintiff was exposed to sufficient levels of the toxin to cause the illness, or "specific…

  13. Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington · February 12, 2018 · in the opinion

    Barabin v. Scapa Dryer Fabrics, Inc. (2018)

    …review and publication; (3) the known or potential error rate of the theory or technique; and (4) whether the theory or technique enjoys general acceptance within the relevant scientific community. See Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharm…

  14. Court case · Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court · May 25, 1972 · in the opinion

    Bambrick v. Asten Hill Mfg. Co. et al. (1972)

    …he meant asbestosis when he said asbestos exposure, as well as exceed our judicial prerogative. The General Assembly has limited recovery to death caused by asbestosis, not asbestos exposure. There is insufficient evidence upon which to…

  15. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · June 7, 2016 · in the opinion

    Murphy v. Alcatel-Lucent USA Inc. (2016)

    …with a motion and proposed order to have the exceptions set for hearing, in state court. In general, "\[a\] waiver of the right to remove must be clear and unequivocal." Furthermore, as explained in Bourdier v…

  16. Court case · North Carolina Court of Appeals · August 16, 2005 · in the opinion

    Payne v. Charlotte Heating & Air Cond. (2005)

    …silicosis and other latent occupational diseases and we can conceive of none. As [\363] was true in Walters, the general goals articulated by defendants for the statute are legitimate state interests, but N.C. Gen.Stat…

  17. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit · April 13, 1982 · in the opinion

    Director, Office OF Workers'comp. v. Newport News Shipbuilding and Dry Dock Co. (1982)

    …Corp. The United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia recently has held that the Director has standing to appeal because of his general administrative responsibility and his financial interest in the special fund…

  18. Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · June 14, 1994 · in the opinion

    Kieffer and Co., Inc. v. Industrial Com'n (1994)

    …lung condition represented a right chest mesothelioma with possible branchioplexopathy. Dr. Dosh sent decedent to Dr. Curtis Marder for a second opinion about an open pleural biopsy at Marquette General Hospital (MGH). Dr. Marder wanted Dr…

  19. Court case · California Court of Appeal · July 22, 2008 · in the opinion

    Behshid v. Bondex International, Inc. (2008)

    …in sanding the tiles. Also, there was no evidence of a general nature. There was no evidence as to what type of tiles would have been used in Iran 35 years ago. There was no evidence…

  20. Court case · California Court of Appeal · July 16, 2015 · in the opinion

    Leidig v. Zenith Electronics LLC (2015)

    …the testimony of Bob Darby, an engineer who had met decedent at General Motors Defense Research Lab (GM) in the 1960's and who claimed to have seen decedent work on radios and televisions, including Zeniths…