No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

53 results for “General Electric”, page 2 of 3

  1. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit · January 18, 2000

    Barnes v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (2000)

    …plant; Barton Brands Distillery; Anaconda Aluminum, Louisville; Brown & Williamson general laborer and maintenance machinist Anaconda Aluminum Louisville 1963-1973; maintenance worker Brown & Williamson 1973-1982; worker in the whiskey filtration department Barton Brands Distillery 1959-1990

  2. Court case · Maryland Court of Appeals · November 16, 2009

    Csr, Limited v. Taylor (2009)

    …to residents. Foreseeability that its products will arrive and cause injury, a customer's choice of port, and general trade advertising do not satisfy this. Personal Jurisdiction; Venue, Removal and Transfer Worksites: Port of Baltimore; Port…

  3. Court case · New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division · May 26, 2021

    Fowler v. Akzo Nobel Chemicals, Inc. (2021)

    …be told this. In multi-defendant asbestos cases, medical causation instructions must include the frequency, regularity and proximity test, not just a general proximate cause charge. Causation; Product Identification; Failure to Warn; Design Defect; Sophisticated User…

  4. Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · September 9, 2008 · in the opinion

    Taylor v. Csr Limited (2008)

    …of Baltimore for sugar deliveries from which CSR derived substantial revenue. Taylor next contends that she presented evidence satisfying the due process requirements for Maryland's exercise of both specific and general personal jurisdiction over CSR…

  5. Court case · Utah Court of Appeals · April 4, 2013 · in the opinion

    Riggs v. Asbestos Corp. Ltd. (2013)

    …P.2d 629, 634 (Utah 1995) ("The general rule regarding statutes of limitations is that the limitation period begins to run [\67] when the last event necessary to complete the cause of action occurs."). In other…

  6. Court case · Oregon Court of Appeals · December 29, 2010 · in the opinion

    Griffin v. Allis-Chalmers Corporation Product Liability Trust (2010)

    …in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party—here, plaintiff—and draw all reasonable inferences in plaintiff's favor. Jones v. General Motors Corp., 325 Or 404, 408, 939 P2d 608 (1997). Plaintiff worked as…

  7. Court case · California Court of Appeal · November 21, 2018 · in the opinion

    Trapp v. CertainTEED Corporation (2018)

    …at p. 1143.) The Supreme Court explained: "By making exceptions to Civil Code section 1714's general duty of ordinary care only when foreseeability and policy considerations justify a categorical no-duty rule, we preserve the…

  8. Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · March 2, 2021 · in the opinion

    Neely EX rel. Estate OF Goehring v. Union Carbide Corporation (2021)

    …manufactured, or marketed by Union Carbide were a substantial factor in causing Janet's mesothelioma. Union Carbide does not raise a general causation challenge. As the parties acknowledge, the proper framework for analysis of specific causation…

  9. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Maryland · July 17, 2017 · in the opinion

    Rockman v. Union Carbide Corp. (2017)

    …702(c) of the Federal Rules of Evidence, nor do they satisfy the Daubert factors, including "testability," "peer review," and "general acceptance" within the "relevant scientific community," Bresler, 855 F.3d at 195. On the contrary…

  10. Court case · Florida Supreme Court · October 29, 2015 · in the opinion

    Aubin v. Union Carbide Corporation (2015)

    …jury instructions pertaining to the duty to warn. Aubin requested the trial court to include a general instruction that Union Carbide had the duty to warn the end user, while Union Carbide asserted that it was…

  11. Court case · California Court of Appeal · May 26, 1998 · in the opinion

    Gutierrez v. Cassiar Mining Corp. (1998)

    …fault, warnings Cassiar placed on its product, general knowledge by asbestos workers (by the early 1970's) of asbestos exposure risks, and preexisting lung conditions caused by Gutierrez having smoked and had exposure to tuberculosis (TB)…

  12. Court case · California Court of Appeal · January 28, 2010 · in the opinion

    Johnson v. Certainteed Corporation (2010)

    …according to Johnson, is on whether "the category of negligent conduct at issue, considering the general character of the event, is sufficiently likely to result in the kind of harm experienced, so that liability may be…

  13. Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Ohio · November 17, 1988 · in the opinion

    Adkins v. GAF Corp. (1988)

    …sold by ACL is processed raw asbestos fiber. Asbestos exposure causes asbestosis. This fact was general knowledge in the asbestos industry in the State of Ohio at least after 1945. Not every exposure to asbestos, however…

  14. Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of Louisiana · February 12, 2025 · in the opinion

    Alford v. Taylor-Seidenbach, Inc. (2025)

    …Supreme Court in Halphen v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp. ("Halphen I"): There is general agreement upon the most basic principles of strict tort products liability. In order to recover from a manufacturer, the plaintiff must prove…

  15. Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Louisiana · November 6, 2017 · in the opinion

    Bordelon v. Atlantic Richfield Co. (2017)

    …13-1. In general, courts have found plaintiffs not to be dilatory when the plaintiff amends his complaint "before any trial or pre-trial dates were scheduled and no significant activity beyond the pleading stage has…

  16. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit · April 18, 2006 · in the opinion

    Conwed Corp. v. Union Carbide Corp. (2006)

    …Conwed and Union Carbide at fault for causing injuries to six of those employees, and awarded common law damages, including general disability and loss of future earning capacity. In accordance with Tyroll v. Private Label Chemicals…

  17. Court case · New York Supreme Court · February 22, 2016 · in the opinion

    Bartolone v. Union Carbide Corp. (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2016)

    …a Union Carbide product or provide a "scientific expression" of an exposure level. Dr. Moline cannot establish general or specific causation, defendant argues, where the product cannot be identified. PLAINTIFF'S ARGUMENTS Plaintiff argues that Campanella…

  18. Product

    Asbestos Industrial Process Materials: Drilling Mud and Filler Fiber

    …dust from every sack stayed in the air around the mixer. Filler and reinforcing fiber. The same raw chrysotile was sold to manufacturers and job sites as a general-purpose filler: fiber blended into plastics, mastics…

  19. Court case · California Court of Appeal · November 16, 2010 · in the opinion

    Stewart v. Union Carbide Corporation (2010)

    …by asbestos, that medical tests showed that there were asbestos fibers in his lungs, that such fibers are not found in the general population, and that he had had a significant exposure to asbestos. Based on…

  20. Court case · Indiana Court of Appeals · August 31, 2007 · in the opinion

    TH Agriculture and Nutrition, LLC. v. Akaiwa (2007)

    …Article I, Section 23 of the Indiana Constitution. Article I, Section 23 of the Indiana Constitution provides that "\[t\]he General Assembly shall not grant to any citizen, or class of citizens, privileges or immunities, which…