No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

62 results for “General Electric”, page 2 of 4

  1. Industry

    Asbestos Exposure in Iron and Steel Mills

    …a product catalog dedicated to the steel industry, in our document archive. _This page is provided for general informational purposes and does not constitute legal advice. Every asbestos case turns on its own facts, exposure history…

  2. Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · March 11, 1999 · in the opinion

    North American Refractory Co. v. Easter (1999)

    …909] Under Alabama law, proof of proximate causation is an essential element for both products liability and negligence claims. See Taylor v. General Motors Corp., 707 So.2d 198, 202 (Ala.1997) (products liability); Rutley v…

  3. Court case · Ohio Court of Appeals · November 30, 2015

    Bryant v. General Motors Corp. (2015)

    …for the jury, and an expert may rely on assumed facts that independent evidence supports. Causation; Expert Testimony; Trial Procedure and Discovery Worksites: General Motors Defiance foundry (GM Powertrain); GM Powertrain Division, Defiance facility, Defiance core…

  4. Court case · California Supreme Court · August 4, 1986

    General Foundry Service v. Workers'comp. Appeals BD. (1986)

    …considered before the final permanent disability rating, rather than applying the odd lot doctrine. Statute of Limitations; Employer and Contractor Liability, and Workers' Compensation; Compensatory Damages Worksites: General Foundry Service molder General Foundry Service 1952-1981

  5. Court case · Indiana Court of Appeals · July 20, 2001 · in the opinion

    Black v. ACandS, Inc. (2001)

    …concluded that the plaintiff in McIntosh was not entitled to a remedy under Section 12 because "the General Assembly has determined that injuries occurring ten years after the product was delivered to a user are not…

  6. Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · January 17, 2003

    Garlock v. Gallagher (2003)

    …Sparrows Point plant (steel mill); General Motors plant, Halethorpe; Bethlehem Steel, Sparrows Point, Sparrows Point; General Motors plant, Halethorpe, Halethorpe pipe fitter Bethlehem Steel, Sparrows Point Sparrows Point 1946-1979; warehouseman General Motors plant, Halethorpe Halethorpe

  7. Court case · Indiana Supreme Court · March 25, 2003

    Jurich v. Garlock, Inc. (2003)

    …applied. One statute covers asbestos claims against those who mined and sold asbestos. The other is the general ten-year statute of repose for product claims. The trial court granted summary judgment to the defendants. The…

  8. Court case · New York Supreme Court · June 24, 2019

    Djokic v. Steel Grip (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2019)

    …s proof; it must show its product did not contribute to the disease, and conflicting expert opinions on general and specific causation raise fact issues. A consortium claim fails where the exposure preceded the marriage. Causation;…

  9. Court case · Michigan Supreme Court · July 25, 2007 · in the opinion

    In re Certified Question From the Fourteenth District Court OF Appeals OF Texas (2007)

    of a general duty to exercise reasonable care in preventing foreseeable harm ... is fair and just." \[Olivo, supra at 402, quoting Hopkins v Fox & Lazo Realtors, 132 NJ 426, 438; 625 A2d 1110 (1993) (emphasis added…

  10. Court case · Alabama Supreme Court · December 16, 2011 · in the opinion

    Bradberry v. Carrier Corporation ET AL. (2011)

    \[8\] An exception to the general rule that the automatic stay does not apply to solvent codefendants has been recognized in certain "unusual circumstances" that are not present in this case. See A.H. Robbins Co…

  11. Court case · Kentucky Court of Appeals · April 1, 2005 · in the opinion

    Parker v. Henry A. Petter Supply Co. (2005)

    …Mine and Mill Supply's liability and that Parker could have pursued IRECO as a defendant. The general rule regarding liability of a corporate successor in Kentucky is that a purchasing corporation does not assume liability…

  12. Court case · Oklahoma Court of Civil Appeals · March 28, 2007

    Zinc Corp. OF America v. Reeder (2007)

    …s workers' compensation statute applies only to silicosis and asbestosis, not mesothelioma, so the general last-injurious-exposure rule applies, under which the last employer is liable without a minimum quantity of exposure. Causation; Expert Testimony…

  13. Court case · Indiana Court of Appeals · October 18, 2001

    Jurich v. Garlock, Inc. (2001)

    …not sellers of asbestos-containing products. The general ten-year repose period violates the open courts clause of Article I, Section 12 as applied to a latent asbestos disease where exposure began before the Act or…

  14. Court case · Ohio Supreme Court · August 16, 1995 · in the opinion

    State ex rel. Liposchak v. Indus. Comm. (1995)

    …Jaffy, for relator. Betty D. Montgomery, Attorney General, and Yolanda L. Barnes, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent. Per Curiam. Claimant's mesothelioma undeniably arose from his employment at Wheeling-Pittsburgh Steel. Claimant's mesothelioma undeniably prevents…

  15. Court case · Maryland Court of Appeals · June 3, 1985 · in the opinion

    Smith v. Bethlehem Steel Corp. (1985)

    …the Smiths' theory, a separate three-year period beginning with award would govern limitations "as to such employee." We do not believe the General Assembly intended so great a fragmentation of third-party actions, particularly when …

  16. Court case · Indiana Court of Appeals · September 14, 2001 · in the opinion

    Parks v. AP Green Industries, Inc. (2001)

    …disease and its cause constitutes a new injury and the basis for a separate cause of action. In general, product liability actions must be brought within two years after the cause of action accrues or within…

  17. Court case · Ohio Court of Appeals · August 23, 2007 · in the opinion

    Rahmes v. Adience Inc. (2007)

    …contracting or selling or installation business? {¶ 23} "A. Yes. {¶ 24} "Q. And general idea, how far outside of Cincinnati, Cincinnati area would some of these operations take place? {¶ 25} "A. Do you have a time framework…

  18. Court case · Ohio Court of Appeals · March 15, 2007 · in the opinion

    Vince v. Crane Co. (2007)

    …sua sponte order Owens-Illinois, Inc. dismissed from this appeal. \[3\] The General Assembly effectively overruled paragraph two of the syllabus to Horton with the adoption of R.C. 2307.96(B), effective to cases filed…

  19. Court case · Ohio Court of Appeals · November 15, 2018 · in the opinion

    Case v. Clark Indus. Insulation (2018)

    …objection instead, and (2) the defense was not available at the time of the response. {¶ 27} JCI inserted general objections to every interrogatory regarding "sales that relate to a period of time, geographical area, or activity…

  20. Court case · Oregon Court of Appeals · March 31, 2005 · in the opinion

    West v. Allied Signal, Inc. (2005)

    …America, Inc., a Delaware corporation, individually and as successor-in-interest to Nuturn Corporation; Ford Motor Company, a Delaware corporation; General Motors, a Delaware corporation; G.I. Joe's, an Oregon corporation; Metalclad Insulation Corporation, a…