No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

202 results for “Owens-Corning Fiberglas”, page 2 of 11

  1. Court case · California Court of Appeal · August 25, 2011 · in the opinion

    Woodard v. Crane Co. (2011)

    …design defects, and failure to warn. (Anderson v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1991) 53 Cal.3d 987, 995.) In his complaint, Woodard alleged that Crane's valves were defective based on theories of defective design and…

  2. Court case · California Court of Appeal · November 21, 2014 · in the opinion

    Izell v. Union Carbide Corporation (2014)

    …supra, 205 Cal.App.4th at p. 88; Stevens v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1996) 49 Cal.App.4th 1645, 1668), and we have no cause to address them here. While considerations about the current leadership…

  3. Court case · California Court of Appeal · June 26, 2017 · in the opinion

    City of Pasadena v. Superior Court of Los Angeles County (2017)

    …when addressing statutes of limitations applicable to latent diseases such as mesothelioma. In Buttram v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1997) 16 Cal.4th 520 (Buttram), our Supreme Court noted that "as a general proposition it is…

  4. Court case · California Court of Appeal · November 29, 2007 · in the opinion

    Bakkie v. Union Carbide Corporation (2007)

    …v. Superior Court (1995) 9 Cal.4th 559, 571.) Union Carbide's reliance on Dumin v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1994) 28 Cal.App.4th 650 is similarly unavailing. In Dumin, the plaintiff could not establish…

  5. Court case · California Court of Appeal · June 13, 2012 · in the opinion

    Leonard v. John Crane, Inc. (2012)

    …decades can pass between the first asbestos exposure and development of cancerous mesothelioma tumors. (Buttram v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1997) 16 Cal.4th 520 \[66 Cal.Rptr.2d 438, 941 P.2d 71\] (Buttram).)\[5…

  6. Court case · California Supreme Court · January 12, 2012 · in the opinion

    O'neil v. Crane Co. (2012)

    …General Principles (8) "Generally speaking, manufacturers have a duty to warn consumers about the hazards inherent in their products. (Anderson \[v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp.\], supra, 53 Cal.3d at p. 1003.) The requirement's purpose…

  7. Court case · California Court of Appeal · December 11, 2020 · in the opinion

    Booker v. Imerys Talc America, Inc. (2020)

    …included in the verdict form because they bear strict liability for his injuries. (See Arena v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1998) 63 Cal.App.4th 1178, 1187-1191 \[strict products liability applies to suppliers of raw…

  8. Court case · California Court of Appeal · August 27, 2010 · in the opinion

    Saller v. Crown Cork & Seal Company, Inc. (2010)

    …Sparks v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1995) 32 Cal.App.4th 461, 472 (Sparks).) Products liability may be premised upon a theory of design defect, manufacturing defect, or failure to warn. (Anderson v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. …

  9. Court case · California Court of Appeal · May 9, 2016 · in the opinion

    Rondon v. Hennessy Industries, Inc. (2016)

    …is imposed for three types of product defects: manufacturing defects, design defects, and warning defects. (Anderson v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1991) 53 Cal.3d 987, 995 \[281 Cal.Rptr. 528, 810 P.2d 549\] (Anderson).…

  10. Court case · California Court of Appeal · October 22, 2014 · in the opinion

    Izell v. Union Carbide Corp. (2014)

    …supra, 205 Cal.App.4th at p. 88; Stevens v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1996) 49 Cal.App.4th 1645, 1668 \[57 Cal.Rptr.2d 525\]), and we have no cause to address them here. While…

  11. Court case · California Court of Appeal · July 28, 2017 · in the opinion

    Sandoval v. American Appliance Manufacturing Corp. (2017)

    …We disagree. The purpose of punitive damages is "to punish wrongdoing and deter future misconduct by either the defendant or other potential wrongdoers." (Stevens v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1996) 49 Cal.App.4th 1645, 1658…

  12. Court case · California Court of Appeal · November 8, 2010 · in the opinion

    Reaser v. AW Chesterton Company (2010)

    …the forum non conveniens motion can be granted. In that regard, Hansen v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1996) 51 Cal.App.4th 753 (Hansen) is instructive. Hansen was an asbestos case with 200 named defendants. (Id…

  13. Court case · California Court of Appeal · April 14, 2003 · in the opinion

    Cossman v. DaimlerChrysler Corp. (2003)

    …sought, or otherwise discovered his illness or injuries, prior to Proposition 51's effective date of June 4, 1986." (Buttram v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1997) 16 Cal.4th 520, 525, 66 Cal.Rptr.2d 438…

  14. Court case · California Court of Appeal · November 24, 2008 · in the opinion

    Cunningham v. Buffalo Pumps, Inc. (2008)

    …and Arena v. Owens Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1998) 63 Cal.App.4th 1178 (Arena)\[10\] are unavailing because their attempts to portray their products as too "technical" or "complicated" for application of the consumer expectations test…

  15. Court case · California Court of Appeal · October 28, 2015 · in the opinion

    Marteney v. Union Carbide Corp. (2015)

    …manufacturer's failure to warn rendered the product unsafe to its users.'" (Ibid., quoting Anderson v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1993) 53 Cal.3d 987, 1003.) The jury returned special verdicts that appellants were not negligent…

  16. Court case · California Court of Appeal · April 30, 2002 · in the opinion

    McGonnell v. Kaiser Gypsum Co., Inc. (2002)

    …1420-1421, 37 Cal. Rptr.2d 902), and Dumin v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., supra, 28 Cal.App.4th [\29] at pages 655-656, 33 Cal.Rptr.2d 702, resulted in nonsuits or directed verdicts that…

  17. Court case · California Court of Appeal · December 14, 2006 · in the opinion

    Quarles v. Advocate Mines Limited (2006)

    …person standard. It stresses that negligence, even in a failure-to-warn context, requires proof of the standard of care (Anderson v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1991) 53 Cal.3d 987, 994-995, 1001-1004), and…

  18. Court case · California Court of Appeal · January 28, 2010 · in the opinion

    Johnson v. Certainteed Corporation (2010)

    …trigger strict liability for that product's defect. As already stressed, liability for product defects "is not absolute." (Anderson v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., supra, 53 Cal.3d at p. 994.) The imposition of liability must…

  19. Court case · California Court of Appeal · June 27, 2019 · in the opinion

    Schildknegt v. Air and Liquid Systems Corp. (2019)

    …1104-1105 \[same\]; Dumin v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1994) 28 Cal.App.4th 650, 654-657 \[affirming nonsuit in favor of manufacturer because plaintiff offered insufficient evidence he encountered manufacturer's specific asbestos-containing product…

  20. Court case · California Supreme Court · May 15, 2000 · in the opinion

    Hamilton v. Asbestos Corp., Ltd. (2000)

    …same\]; Sopha v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1999) 230 Wis.2d 212, 601 N.W.2d 627, 636 \[same\]; but see Pustejovsky v. Pittsburgh Corning Corp. (Tex.App.1998) 980 S.W.2d 828, 831-833…