No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

74 results for “Owens-Corning Fiberglas”, page 2 of 4

  1. Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · September 26, 2018 · in the opinion

    Wallace & Gale Asbestos Settlement Trust v. Busch (2018)

    …is what the Court of Appeals has "termed a \bystander,' in that he did not work directly with the asbestos products but was in the vicinity of where such products were used." Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp…

  2. Court case · Maryland Appellate Court · February 8, 2024 · in the opinion

    Basil-Flippen v. General Electric Company (2024)

    …dust." Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. v. Garrett, 343 Md. 500, 506 (1996); see also id. at 506 n.2 (describing the medical field's study of mesothelioma and conclusions about its relation to asbestos); Owens-Illinois…

  3. Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · May 30, 2013 · in the opinion

    Burns v. Bechtel Corp. (2013)

    …v. Raymark Indus., Inc., 905 F.2d 793 (4th Cir.1990) (interpreting Virginia's statute of repose); Buttz v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 557 N.W.2d 90 (Iowa 1996); Olsen v. Oklahoma Gas & Elec. Co.…

  4. Court case · Maryland Court of Appeals · February 10, 2005 · in the opinion

    Wilson v. John Crane, Inc. (2005)

    …to move. For example, this fluid makes it easier for the lungs to move during breathing." See American Cancer Society at http://www.cancer.org. As we noted in Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. v. Garrett, 343…

  5. Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · January 7, 1998 · in the opinion

    ACandS v. Abate (1998)

    …who suffered from asbestosis which, apparently, was manifested only by pleural plaques. See also Barry v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 282 Ill.App.3d 199, 217 Ill.Dec. 823, 668 N.E.2d 8 (1996) (affirming…

  6. Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · May 31, 2006 · in the opinion

    John Crane, Inc. v. Puller (2006)

    …is made." Thus, we are not \[privileged\] to dissect the evidence and weigh the credibility of its messengers, which is what Crane has asked us to do. See Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. v. Garrett, 343 Md…

  7. Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · September 26, 2012 · in the opinion

    Georgia-Pacific v. Farrar (2012)

    …work clothes. The jury returned a verdict in favor of Granski against, inter alia, Owens-Corning, f/k/a Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corporation ("OC"), who manufactured a hazardous asbestos-containing insulation product called Kaylo. Id. at…

  8. Court case · Maryland Court of Appeals · March 23, 2011 · in the opinion

    Scapa Dryer Fabrics, Inc. v. Saville (2011)

    …133 A.2d 428 (1957). The fact, however, that a party has been sued or threatened with suit is not enough to establish joint tort-feasor status. See Owens-Corning Fiberglas, Inc. v. Garrett, 343 Md…

  9. Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · January 17, 2003 · in the opinion

    Garlock v. Gallagher (2003)

    …1992). Thus, we are not privy to dissect the evidence and weigh the credibility of its messengers, which is what Crane has asked us to do. See Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. v. Garrett, 343 Md. 500…

  10. Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · November 20, 2017 · in the opinion

    Davenport v. Mcic, Inc. (2017)

    …is what the Court of Appeals has "termed a \bystander,' in that he did not work directly with the asbestos products but was in the vicinity of where such products were used." Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp…

  11. Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · December 29, 2009 · in the opinion

    Scapa Dryer Fabrics, Inc. v. Saville (2009)

    …to the Cross-Defendants' products than to Scapa's products, and that the jury's verdict is therefore inconsistent and warrants a JNOV.\[5\] As the Court of Appeals explained in Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. v…

  12. Court case · Maryland Court of Appeals · October 11, 1996 · in the opinion

    ACandS Inc. v. Asner (1996)

    …negligence, strict liability, and punitive damages. A TLV evidence is an important subset of state of the art evidence concerning asbestos-containing products and consumer health. See Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. v. Garrett, 343 Md. 500…

  13. Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · December 28, 2000 · in the opinion

    Hollingsworth v. Connor (2000)

    …enough to establish joint tortfeasor status. Jacobs v. Flynn, 131 Md.App. 342, 374-75, 749 A.2d 174 (2000). See Owens-Corning Fiberglas, Corp. v. Garrett, 343 Md. 500, 531-32, 682 A.2d 1143 …

  14. Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · February 2, 2010 · in the opinion

    Scapa Dryer Fabrics, Inc. v. Saville (2010)

    …to the Cross-Defendants' products than to Scapa's products, and that the jury's verdict is therefore inconsistent and warrants a JNOV.\[5\] As the Court of Appeals explained in Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. v…

  15. Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · May 3, 2005 · in the opinion

    Benjamin v. Union Carbide Corporation (2005)

    …Wilson v. John Crane, Inc., 385 Md. 185, \_\_\_ (2005)(quoting Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. v. Garrett, 343 Md. 500, 506-507 n.2 (1996)). \[5\] The court granted the motion after a hearing held on April…

  16. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Maryland · July 11, 2002 · in the opinion

    Sledz v. Flintkote Co. (2002)

    …key question for courts regarding removal under § 1446(b) has been when an action commences [\562] for the purposes of the statute. Zumas v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 907 F.Supp. 131, 132 (D.Md.1995)…

  17. Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · June 22, 2021 · in the opinion

    Staubs v. CSX Transportation, Inc. (2021)

    …. . to recognize the separate disease rule" in toxic exposure cases); Sopha v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 601 N.W.2d 627, 630, 642 (Wis. 1999) (holding that "a person who brings an action based on a…

  18. Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · April 27, 1995 · in the opinion

    ACandS, Inc. v. Asner (1995)

    …uniform, we find persuasive the cases that hold that evidence of exposure to a non-party defendant's asbestos products is wholly irrelevant. In Kochan v. Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corp., 242 Ill. App.3d 781, 182…

  19. Court case · Maryland Court of Appeals · April 23, 1999

    Pittsburgh Corning Corp. v. James (1999)

    The Court of Appeals of Maryland affirmed the Court of Special Appeals' dismissal of Pittsburgh Corning's and Owens Corning's appeals, holding that denial of their motions to dismiss for inconvenient forum could not be…

  20. Exposure sites · Maryland

    Maryland Asbestos Exposure Sites: Worksites, Industries, and Trust Coverage

    …site on the other trusts' lists qualifies Babcock & Wilcox: 396 entries (industrial and utility boilers) Combustion Engineering: 378 entries (boilers and refractory) Owens Corning: 366 entries (Kaylo and high-temperature pipe and block insulation) U.S…