202 results for “Owens-Illinois”, page 2 of 11
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · November 21, 2018 · in the opinion
Trapp v. CertainTEED Corporation (2018)
…In so doing, appellants are not "expected to prove the scientifically unknown details of carcinogenesis, or trace the unknowable path of a given asbestos fiber." (Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1997) 16 Cal.4th 953, 976.…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · December 23, 2022 · in the opinion
Bader v. Johnson & Johnson (2022)
…with negligence, product liability, and concealment instructions that incorporated the asbestos-specific standard of proof for causation set forth in Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1997) 16 Cal.4th 953 \[67 Cal.Rptr.2d 16, 941…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · August 27, 2010 · in the opinion
Saller v. Crown Cork & Seal Company, Inc. (2010)
…Sparks v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1995) 32 Cal.App.4th 461, 472 (Sparks).) Products liability may be premised upon a theory of design defect, manufacturing defect, or failure to warn. (Anderson v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. …
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · November 21, 2014 · in the opinion
Beckering v. Shell Oil Co. (2014)
…347, 374, italics added.) Similarly, the Supreme Court of New Jersey unanimously found a duty to protect spouses from household asbestos exposure in Olivo v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (N.J. 2006) 895 A.2d 1143. Olivo…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · March 17, 2017 · in the opinion
Phillips v. Honeywell International Inc. (2017)
…L.Rev. 1153, 1161.) This characteristic underlies our Supreme Court's conclusion in Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1997) 16 Cal.4th 953 (Rutherford) that "\[i\]n an asbestos-related cancer case, the plaintiff need not…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · October 29, 2013 · in the opinion
Pfeifer v. John Crane, Inc. (2013)
…properly attributed to the plaintiff, other defendants, or nonparties to the action. (See Sparks v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1995) 32 Cal.App.4th 461, 476 \[38 Cal.Rptr.2d 739\] (Sparks).) Here, the special verdict form…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of California · March 19, 2021 · in the opinion
Toy v. Armstrong Int'l (In re Asbestos, 2021)
…Dkt. No. 418 at 5. But Plaintiffs bear the burden of establishing that exposure to Defendants' products was a substantial factor causing his illness. See Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc., 16 Cal. 4th 953, 982 (Cal…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · May 15, 2014 · in the opinion
Kesner v. Superior Court of Alameda County (2014)
…due to exposure to friable asbestos. Whether exposure from any particular source was a substantial factor in causing a plaintiff's injury may often be questionable (see Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1997) 16 Cal.4th…
-
Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit · August 3, 2021 · in the opinion
Viale v. Foster Wheeler, LLC (2021)
…a triable issue of fact that Ronald was exposed to asbestos-containing Foster Wheeler products and therefore that exposure was a "substantial factor" causing Ronald's mesothelioma. Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc., 941 P.2d 1203…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · June 18, 2013 · in the opinion
Strickland v. Union Carbide Corp. (2013)
…Zogarts (1975) 14 Cal.3d 104, 110.) Law Governing Proof of Causation in Asbestos Cases Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1997) 16 Cal.4th 953 (Rutherford) sets forth the controlling standard for proving causation in an…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · November 14, 2007 · in the opinion
Rosen v. Regents of University of California (2007)
…on asbestos causation. The trial court—noting that the added language was taken from key asbestos causation cases—denied their motion for new trial. (See Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1997) 16 Cal.4th 953, 982…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · May 30, 2013 · in the opinion
Catiller v. Superior Court of Los Angeles County (2013)
…particular exposure was a substantial factor that is, "more than negligible or theoretical" in causing Edwards's malignant pleural mesothelioma. (Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1997) 16 Cal.4th 953, 975-978.) Because of the discovery…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · February 25, 2009 · in the opinion
Taylor v. Elliott Turbomachinery Co. Inc. (2009)
…this argument, and Cadlo demonstrates that it is fundamentally flawed. We held in Cadlo that Owens-Illinois could not be held strictly liable for Kaylo, a product that it developed and then Taylor v. Elliott Turbomachinery…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · July 22, 2008 · in the opinion
Behshid v. Bondex International, Inc. (2008)
…a substantial factor in causing Dr. Behshid's mesothelioma. This contention is not persuasive. Causation in asbestos cases In Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1997) 16 Cal.4th 953 (Rutherford), the Supreme Court held that the…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · May 18, 2000 · in the opinion
Wilson v. John Crane, Inc. (2000)
…Esq, Morgenstein & Jubelirer LLP, San Francisco, for Amicus Curiae Owens-Illinois, Inc. Certified for Partial Publication.\[\\] [\241] SEPULVEDA, J. This is an appeal from a judgment for plaintiffs Lois and Daniel Wilson, Sr.\[1\] following a…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · March 28, 2003 · in the opinion
Ferris v. Gatke Corporation (2003)
…line separating these two incommensurate paradigms. Some guidance regarding the application of Sindell principles in asbestos-related tort litigation is furnished by the high court's opinion in Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1997) 16 Cal…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · April 18, 2013 · in the opinion
Hernandez v. Amcord, Inc. (2013)
…factor in causing Mr. Hernandez's mesothelioma to a reasonable degree of medical probability. The trial court cited Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1997) 16 Cal.4th 953 \[67 Cal.Rptr.2d 16, 941 P.2d…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · October 27, 2009 · in the opinion
Mahoney v. Georgia-Pacific, LLC (2009)
…the reasons set forth below. A. Causation GP contends that plaintiffs failed to introduce evidence sufficient to satisfy the "substantial factor" standard of causation set forth in Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1997) 16 Cal.4th…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · March 25, 2021 · in the opinion
Putt v. Ford Motor Co. (In re Laosd Asbestos Cases, 2021)
…subd. (a); Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1997) 16 Cal.4th 953, 958 (Rutherford).) "\[I\]f supported by the evidence," a jury must apportion fault against parties and nonparties found responsible for the plaintiff's injury…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · January 22, 2020 · in the opinion
Gibbons v. Johnson & Johnson Consumer (Laosd Asbestos Cases, 2020)
…was a substantial factor causing the illness by showing that in reasonable medical probability it was a substantial factor contributing to the plaintiff's or decedent's risk of developing cancer." (Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc…