No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

27 results for “Owens-Illinois”, page 2 of 2

  1. Court case · Florida District Court of Appeal · November 9, 2016 · in the opinion

    Crane Co. v. DeLisle (2016)

    … Brightwater; and Owens-Corning Fiberglass. Lorillard contested DeLisle's use of Kent cigarettes. DeLisle testified that he smoked on average a pack of Kent cigarettes a day from junior high school until he enlisted in the…

  2. Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Florida · August 2, 2012 · in the opinion

    Faddish v. Buffalo Pumps (2012)

    …Ferayorni v. Hyundai Motor Co., 711 So.2d 1167, 1172 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998), following Anderson v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 53 Cal.3d 987, 281 Cal.Rptr. 528, 810 P.2d 549, 558 (1991). Under…

  3. Court case · Florida District Court of Appeal · June 20, 2018 · in the opinion

    Bechtel Corporation v. Batchelor (2018)

    …possession and control of all or part of the plant such that it owed Mr. Batchelor the same duty that a landowner owes an invitee under the law of premises liability. For the reasons explained below…

  4. Court case · Florida District Court of Appeal · December 27, 2017 · in the opinion

    Bechtel Corporation v. Batchelor (2017)

    …possession and control of all or part of the plant such that it owed Mr. Batchelor the same duty that a landowner owes an invitee under the law of premises liability. For the reasons explained below…

  5. Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Florida · October 19, 2014 · in the opinion

    Oneal v. Alfa Laval, Inc. (2014)

    …a manufacturer is not liable for harm caused by, and owes no duty to warn of the hazards inherent in, asbestos products that the manufacturer did not manufacture or distribute"). This Court likewise is persuaded that…

  6. Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Florida · April 4, 2022 · in the opinion

    Andres v. Raytheon Technologies Corp. (2022)

    …Mr. Andres to asbestos.\[1\] (ECF No. 379 at 13-14.) However, the documents to which the Plaintiff cite do not show that Huntsman owns this property. Rather, these documents show that Huntsman's subsidiaries, and…

  7. Court case · Florida District Court of Appeal · March 30, 2022 · in the opinion

    Ripple v. CBS Corporation (2022)

    …marrying into a cause of action" for loss of consortium. Domino's potentially opens a wide door to a future case in which a person, not necessarily involved in a relationship of love and affection with…