36 results for “Owens-Illinois”, page 2 of 2
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · March 22, 2021 · in the opinion
McDaniel v. John Crane, Inc. (2021)
…must present \evidence of exposure to a specific product on a regular basis over some extended period of time in proximity to where the plaintiff worked.'" Jones v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 69 F.3d 712…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · May 18, 2020 · in the opinion
Whitehead v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2020)
…plaintiff "\must prove more than a casual or minimum contact with the product' containing asbestos in order to hold the manufacturer of that product liable." See Jones v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 69 F.3d 712…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · December 7, 2017 · in the opinion
Queen v. CBS Corporation (2017)
…at 1162-63. This is consistent with the requirements of North Carolina law. See Jones v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 69 F.3d 712, 716 n.2 (4th Cir. 1995) (finding Lohrmann consistent with North Carolina…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · March 21, 2024 · in the opinion
Pike v. Dempster Industries, Inc. (2024)
…plaintiff "\must prove more than a casual or minimum contact with the product' containing asbestos in order to hold the manufacturer of that product liable." See Jones v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 69 F.3d 712…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · October 25, 2022 · in the opinion
Walls v. Ford Motor Company (2022)
…evidence of exposure to a specific product on a regular basis over some extended period of time in proximity to where the plaintiff actually worked.'" (quoting Jones v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 69 F.3d 712…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · February 16, 2021 · in the opinion
Vinson v. Armstrong International, Inc. (2021)
…plaintiff "\must prove more than a casual or minimum contact with the product' containing asbestos in order to hold the manufacturer of that product liable." See Jones v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 69 F.3d 712…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · February 16, 2021 · in the opinion
Brock v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2021)
…plaintiff "\must prove more than a casual or minimum contact with the product' containing asbestos in order to hold the manufacturer of that product liable." See Jones v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 69 F.3d 712…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · February 25, 2022 · in the opinion
Walls v. Ford Motor Company (2022)
…nature upon which a jury can make the necessary inference that there is a causal connection between a defendant's action and a plaintiff's injury." Prekler v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 60 F.3d 824…
-
Court case · U.S. Bankruptcy Court, Western District of North Carolina · December 28, 2023 · in the opinion
In re Aldrich Pump LLC (2023)
…Trust. Meanwhile, each Debtor owns an operating subsidiary and has a business of sorts—managing the tens of thousands of asbestos litigation claims against them. See Declaration of Allen Tananbaum in support of Debtor's Objection.…
-
Court case · U.S. Bankruptcy Court, Western District of North Carolina · July 29, 2019 · in the opinion
In re Bestwall LLC (2019)
…can be addressed in the plan confirmation process. Even outside of the Funding Agreement, Bestwall owns substantial assets and operating businesses that produce cash flow. These include bank accounts that contain approximately $20 million in cash…
-
Court case · U.S. Bankruptcy Court, Western District of North Carolina · August 10, 2021 · in the opinion
In re Dbmp LLC (2021)
…Debtor's cash flow is insufficient, New CertainTeed is required to provide DBMP with the funds that DBMP would then use to pay any indemnity it allegedly owes to New CertainTeed, on the effective date of…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · February 28, 2020 · in the opinion
Brock v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2020)
…of: (1) "whether the defendant maintains offices or agents in the forum state"; (2) "whether the defendant owns property in the forum state"; (3) "whether the defendant reached into the forum state to solicit or initiate…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · November 21, 2017 · in the opinion
Young v. American Talc Company (2017)
…of factors: (1) "whether the defendant maintains offices or agents in the forum state;" (2) "whether the defendant owns property in the forum state;" (3) "whether the defendant reached into the forum state to solicit or…
-
Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit · June 20, 2023 · in the opinion
In re Bestwall LLC (2023)
…PLLC, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellant Sandler L. Esserman. Gregory M. Gordon, Dallas, Texas, C. Kevin Marshall, Megan Lacy Owen, JONES DAY, Washington, D.C.; Garland S. Cassada, Richard C. Worf, Jr., ROBINSON, BRADSHAW & HINSON, P…
-
Court case · U.S. Bankruptcy Court, Western District of North Carolina · August 23, 2021 · in the opinion
In re Aldrich Pump LLC (2021)
…. for the debtor to satisfy an indemnification obligation that it owes to said affiliate" in the event that a debtor's funds are insufficient to cover its indemnification obligations). \[127\] ACC Ex. 105 ("Secondment Agreement"). \[128…
-
Court case · North Carolina Court of Appeals · September 3, 2019 · in the opinion
Hinson v. Continental Tire the Americas (2019)
…were layered together and pressed in a tire-building machine..... The "green tires" were then transported to the curing department. There were 147 clam-shell-shaped curing presses/ovens in the curing department..... The curing process…