55 results for “Owens-Illinois”, page 2 of 3
-
Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · August 13, 2007 · in the opinion
Georgia-Pacific Corp. v. Stephens (2007)
…by defendant, and coworker testified that he used defendant's pipe covering approximately ninety percent of time and installed it in areas where plaintiff regularly worked). But cf. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. v. Garrett, 343 Md…
-
Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · October 24, 2002 · in the opinion
Vaughn v. Ford Motor Co. (2002)
…its discretion. TransAmerican Natural Gas Corporation v. Powell, supra. Reversible Error, Directed Verdict, and Illinois Law Having found error, we must next determine if the error is reversible. TEX. R.APP.P. 44.1. An error…
-
Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · March 11, 1999 · in the opinion
North American Refractory Co. v. Easter (1999)
…1946 to 1951 and again from 1953 to 1988. In this time, he worked at seven different steam plants where he was exposed to several asbestos products manufactured by Owens-Corning, Owen-Illinois, Johns-Manville, Kaiser…
-
Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · May 14, 1998
Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. v. Sitz (1998)
The court of appeals reversed the $20 million judgment for the Sitz family against Owens-Corning, holding the trial court wrongly applied offensive collateral estoppel on liability issues, and remanded the case. Offensive collateral estoppel should…
-
Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · May 4, 1995
Click v. Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corp. (1995)
The appeals court reversed the directed verdict for Owens-Corning Fiberglass and Pittsburgh Corning and remanded for trial, ruling that the Click family had presented enough circumstantial evidence that George Click was exposed to the companies…
-
Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · February 14, 1996
Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. v. Wasiak (1996)
The court affirmed the trial court's judgment for the plaintiffs (about $1.8 million compensatory and $3.7 million punitive damages) against Owens-Corning, overruling all eleven points of error. Under Alabama law and due…
-
Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · September 30, 1998
Pustejovsky v. Pittsburgh Corning Corp. (1998)
The court affirmed summary judgment for Owens-Corning Fiberglas, Pittsburgh Corning and Rapid-American, holding the widow's mesothelioma claim was barred by limitations because it accrued in 1982 with the asbestosis diagnosis. Under Texas's…
-
Court case · Texas Supreme Court · November 30, 2000
Pustejovsky v. Rapid-American Corp. (2000)
…$25,000. In 1994 he was diagnosed with malignant pleural mesothelioma and, within two months, sued Rapid-American, Owens Corning, Pittsburgh Corning and other asbestos suppliers. He later died, and his wife continued the case. The…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Texas · January 14, 1980
Mooney v. Fibreboard Corp. (1980)
R. L. Mooney, Sr. worked as an insulator from 1940 to 1970 and handled large quantities of insulation containing asbestos. He sued eleven companies that allegedly made or sold such products, under strict product liability, saying he had lung…
-
Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · August 5, 1999 · in the opinion
Pittsburgh Corning Corp. v. Walters (1999)
…February, 1995, defendant Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corporation filed a motion to take judicial notice of California law without any reference to or proof of that law. The trial court permitted PCC to adopt this motion. In…
-
Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · August 29, 2008 · in the opinion
Satterfield v. Crown Cork & Seal Co., Inc. (2008)
…applied retroactively where doing so would destroy or impair vested rights. See Baker Hughes, 12 S.W.3d at 4; Owens Corning, 997 S.W.2d at 572-73; Likes, 962 S.W.2d at 502…
-
Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · December 28, 2012 · in the opinion
Hearn v. Snapka (2012)
…is on the presenting party."). On appeal, it is appellant's burden to negate all legitimate grounds for the trial court's ruling. See Owens-Corning, 972 S.W.2d at 43; The State Bar v…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Texas · August 24, 2023 · in the opinion
United Refining Co. v. Dorrion (2023)
…151, 154 n. 1 (5th Cir. 2014), citing Wright v. Owens Corning, 679 F.3d 101 (3d Cir. 2012). But whether new or old law applies, it's clear that the Decedent had a dischargeable, prepetition…
-
Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · December 28, 2018 · in the opinion
Jefferson County v. Farris (2018)
…was not jurisdictional, the court concluded that the presuit notice requirement was not jurisdictional either. Id. at 360-65 (citing Brown v. Owens, 674 S.W.2d 748, 751 (Tex. 1984)). In 2005, and in response…
-
Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · July 31, 2003 · in the opinion
Brown & Root, Inc. v. Shelton (2003)
…contractors who install such improvements from a perpetual threat of liability. See Petro Stopping Ctrs., Inc. v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 906 S.W.2d 618, 620 (Tex.App.El Paso 1995, no writ). If applicable…
-
Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · December 21, 2006 · in the opinion
Gilcrease v. Garlock, Inc. (2006)
…A.P. Green Industries ($750,000); Owens-Corning Fiberglas ($300,000); and Fibreboard ($900,000).\[2\] Appellants argued that these settlements were void and should not count as credits because they had not been paid. Following…
-
Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · September 8, 1993 · in the opinion
Keene Corp. v. Rogers (1993)
…can cause serious damage when injected, but which is the only known way to cure the deadly disease. \[6\] An attorney representing Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corporation actually made the objection, but the parties agreed at trial…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Texas · August 23, 2023 · in the opinion
United Refining Company v. Dorrion (2023)
…In re Placid Oil Co, 753 F3d 151, 154 n 1 (5th Cir 2014), citing Wright v Owens Corning, 679 F3d 101 (3d Cir 2012). But whether new or old law applies, it's clear that…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of Texas · September 25, 2006 · in the opinion
Jacobs v. Tapscott (2006)
…fees when awarding exemplary damages, and the court has located a Texas case that suggests that they cannot be considered under facts like those here. See Hawkins v. Owens, 2000 WL 1199254, at [\10] (Tex. App…
-
Court case · U.S. Bankruptcy Court, Southern District of Texas · January 16, 2021 · in the opinion
In re United Refining Company (2021)
…3d Cir. 2010), but the accrual test still applies in the Third Circuit for plans confirmed before 2010. Wright v. Owens Corning, 679 F.3d 101, 109 (3d Cir. 2012).\[5\] Under the conduct test, a…