No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

43 results for “Owens-Illinois”, page 2 of 3

  1. Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · December 11, 2001 · in the opinion

    Dykstra v. AP Green Industries, Inc. (2001)

    …App.3d at 461, 243 Ill.Dec. 579, 723 N.E.2d at 1182. In Hefner v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 276 Ill.App.3d 1099, 213 Ill.Dec. 532, 659 N.E.2d 448 (1995…

  2. Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of Pennsylvania · May 7, 1992

    Sealover v. Carey Canada (1992)

    …GAF, National Gypsum) jointly and severally liable, deducted the Owens-Corning settlement and a one-sixth Manville Trust share from the verdict, and awarded the plaintiffs Rule 238 delay damages, with some periods excluded. Where several…

  3. Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington · September 2, 2014 · in the opinion

    McMann v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2014)

    Moreover, the insulation contract, which was given to Owens Corning, was awarded in August of 1970. Owens Corning employees arrived on the job site in the week ending September 6, 1970. Aside from Plaintiff's testimony…

  4. Court case · New York Supreme Court · August 6, 2015 · in the opinion

    Galasso v. BF Goodrich (Matter of New York City Asbestos Litig., 2015)

    1995\]). In addition, issues of credibility are for the jury (Cochrane v Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corp., 219 AD2d 557, 559-60). Where "\[t\]he deposition testimony of a litigant is sufficient to raise an issue of…

  5. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit · December 10, 2010 · in the opinion

    Albina Engine & Machine v. Director, Owcp (2010)

    …Decedent worked around asbestos at Lockheed, but it does constitute reasonable circumstantial evidence of exposure: Norgaard describes the installation of asbestos-containing materials by Owens-Corning employees on ships being constructed in shipyards, including Lockheed's…

  6. Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · May 31, 2006 · in the opinion

    Thomas v. AP Green Industries, Inc. (2006)

    …gaskets. In evaluating liability in an asbestos case, traditional tort liability theories, including negligence, apply and require proof of causation. Emery v. Owens-Corp., 2000-2144, p. 12 (La.App. 1 Cir. 11/9/01), 813…

  7. Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of North Carolina · January 26, 2022 · in the opinion

    Barkley v. 4520 Corp., Inc. (2022)

    …has held that a plaintiff must "prove more than a casual or minimum contact with the product containing asbestos in order to hold \[the defendant\] liable." Jones v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 69 F.3d 712…

  8. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Minnesota · October 10, 2017 · in the opinion

    McGill v. Conwed Corporation (2017)

    …LLC, 829 F.3d 963, 964 (8th Cir. 2016) (per curiam) (citing Dart Cherokee Basin Operating Co., LLC v. Owens, 135 S. Ct. 547, 554 (2014)). But when a plaintiff challenges jurisdiction on a motion to…

  9. Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · November 18, 2009 · in the opinion

    Estate of Hicks v. Dana Companies, LLC (2009)

    …and any conflict in the evidence must be resolved in his favor."); see also, Cauthorn v. Owens Corning Fiberglas Corp., 840 A.2d 1028, 1033, 1038-1039 (Pa.Super.2004) (holding that the jury was free…

  10. Court case · Pennsylvania Supreme Court · February 19, 2020 · in the opinion

    Roverano v. John Crane, Inc. (2020)

    …case law involving strict liability and asbestos actions. See id. at 23-26 (relying on, inter alia, Martin v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas, 515 Pa. 377, 528 A.2d 947, 949 (Pa. 1985) (the trial court must…

  11. Court case · New York Supreme Court · February 28, 2011 · in the opinion

    Konstantin v. 630 Third Ave. Assocs. (2011)

    …of exposure by the plaintiff herein constitutes a separately compensable injury. In support, plaintiffs rely on Consorti v Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corp., 86 NY2d 449 \[1995\], in which the Court of Appeals found that a widow…

  12. Court case · California Supreme Court · December 19, 2005 · in the opinion

    Kinsman v. Unocal Corporation (2005)

    …owned by defendant Unocal Corporation, that term is used to refer to either an owner or a possessor of land that owes some kind of duty of care to keep the premises safe. (See Alcaraz v…

  13. Court case · California Court of Appeal · June 20, 2007 · in the opinion

    Kinsman v. Unocal Corporation (2007)

    …negligence theory) unless the manufacturer had actual or constructive knowledge of the potential hazard. (Anderson v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1991) 53 Cal.3d 987, 1002-1003.) Unocal contends the notion of what constitutes a "hazard…

  14. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · January 13, 2023 · in the opinion

    King v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. (2023)

    …When there are multiple causes of injury, "a defendant's conduct is a cause in fact if it is a substantial factor generating plaintiff's harm." Adams v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 923 So. 2d 118…

  15. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · March 14, 2022 · in the opinion

    Roussell v. Huntington Ingalls, Inc. (2022)

    …When there are multiple causes of injury, "a defendant's conduct is a cause in fact if it is a substantial factor generating plaintiff's harm." Adams v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 923 So. 2d 118…

  16. Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of Louisiana · October 24, 2022 · in the opinion

    Reulet v. Lamorak Ins. Co. (2022)

    …a). In making this assessment, the Court must view all evidence and make all reasonable inferences in the light most favorable to Plaintiffs (and Avondale)—the non-moving parties. Owens v. Circassia Pharms., Inc., 33 F…

  17. Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · May 3, 2005 · in the opinion

    Benjamin v. Union Carbide Corporation (2005)

    …Wilson v. John Crane, Inc., 385 Md. 185, \_\_\_ (2005)(quoting Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. v. Garrett, 343 Md. 500, 506-507 n.2 (1996)). \[5\] The court granted the motion after a hearing held on April…

  18. Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of Louisiana · October 31, 2022 · in the opinion

    Reulet v. Lamorak Ins. Co. (2022)

    …a). In making this assessment, the Court must view all evidence and make all reasonable inferences in the light most favorable to Plaintiffs and Avondale—the non-moving parties. Owens v. Circassia Pharms., Inc., 33 F…

  19. Court case · New York Supreme Court · September 20, 2012 · in the opinion

    Konstantin v. 630 Third Ave. Assoc. (2012)

    …NY2d 818 \[1999\], cert den sub nom Worthington Corp v. Ronsini, 529 US 1019 \[2000\]); Zalinka v. Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corp, 221 AD2d 830 \[3rd Dept 1995\]; Bigelow v. Acands, Inc, 196 AD2d 436 \[1st Dept…

  20. Court case · Rhode Island Superior Court · April 7, 2011 · in the opinion

    Carlson v. 84 Lumber Company (2011)

    …3d 516, 526 n.4 (Cal. 2010) (quoting Buttram v. Owns-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 941 P.2d 71 (Cal. 1997)) (alteration in original). \[10\] Although the location of the injury is significant to this determination, this…