No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

96 results for “Owens-Illinois”, page 2 of 5

  1. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Maryland · August 10, 2015 · in the opinion

    Haney v. 3M Company (2015)

    …for Summary Judgment \[ECF No. 849\] is GRANTED. The Cross-Claim of Hopeman Brothers, Inc., Against Defendant Owens Illinois, Inc. \[ECF No. 687\] is DISMISSED AS MOOT. Judgment shall be entered by separate Order. SO ORDERED…

  2. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit · July 26, 1984 · in the opinion

    Halphen v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp. (1984)

    …for plaintiff-appellee. [\464] Robert S. Rooth, New Orleans, La., for amicus curiae Owens-Illinois, Inc. Before CLARK, Chief Judge, POLITZ and JOHNSON, Circuit Judges. POLITZ, Circuit Judge: This Louisiana diversity case occasions an examination of…

  3. Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · April 21, 2011 · in the opinion

    Linster v. Allied Signal, Inc. (2011)

    …J.H. France Refractories Co., J.P. Stevens, Inc., Melrath Gasket, Inc., Metropolitan Life Insurance Co., Owens-Illinois, Inc., Pecora Corporation, Rapid American Corporation, Rhone-Poulenc, Riley Stoker Corporation, Sepco Corporation, Inc., Sid Harvey Midatlantic, Inc…

  4. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · February 3, 2009 · in the opinion

    Kurns v. AW Chesterton (2009)

    …date of the Minot, North Dakota, derailment. \[11\] In furtherance of the FRSA Amendment argument, plaintiff also relies on DeFrancisco v. Owens-Illinois, Docket No. CAM-L-1127-05 (N.J. Super. Ct., Cam den Cty…

  5. Court case · California Court of Appeal · February 25, 2009 · in the opinion

    Taylor v. Elliott Turbomachinery Co. Inc. (2009)

    …this argument, and Cadlo demonstrates that it is fundamentally flawed. We held in Cadlo that Owens-Illinois could not be held strictly liable for Kaylo, a product that it developed and then Taylor v. Elliott Turbomachinery…

  6. Court case · Maryland Court of Appeals · October 11, 1996 · in the opinion

    ACandS Inc. v. Asner (1996)

    …s conclusions, namely that the evidence relating to TLVs offered by the petitioners was properly excluded and that the evidence offered in support of punitive damages was sufficient under the test enunciated in Owens-Illinois, Inc…

  7. Court case · Virginia Supreme Court · November 4, 2005 · in the opinion

    Garlock Sealing Technologies, LLC v. Little (2005)

    …Richard S. Glasser, Norfolk; Patten, Wornom, Hatten & Diamonstein, Newport News; Glasser & Glasser, Norfolk, on brief), for appellee. Owens-Illinois, Inc., John Crane, Inc., Dana Corp., Lincoln Elec. Co., Hobart Bros., and S.B. Decking Co., Inc. …

  8. Court case · California Court of Appeal · March 15, 2016 · in the opinion

    DePREE v. BASF Catalysts LLC (2016)

    …the defendant's asbestos products was, in reasonable medical probability, a substantial factor in causing or contributing to \[the\] risk of developing cancer." (Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1997) 16 Cal.4th 953, 957-958 (Rutherford)…

  9. Court case · California Court of Appeal · November 24, 2008 · in the opinion

    Cunningham v. Buffalo Pumps, Inc. (2008)

    …plaintiffs failed to establish its products caused Cunningham's mesothelioma. We disagree. Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1997) 16 Cal.4th 953 (Rutherford) sets forth the controlling two-part test for determining whether exposure to asbestos…

  10. Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of California · March 26, 2021 · in the opinion

    Toy v. Honeywell Int'l (In re Asbestos, 2021)

    …ago. See, e.g., Brodkin Report at 64. Defendant first cites to the California Supreme Court's opinion in Rutherford v. Owens Illinois, Inc., regarding the proof of causation required in asbestos-related cases. 16 Cal…

  11. Court case · New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division · December 15, 2008 · in the opinion

    Sarkozy v. AP Green Industries, Inc. (2008)

    …CO., INC., M.H. DETRICK COMPANY, MADSEN & HOWELL, INC., METROPOLITAN REFRACTORIES CORPORATION, OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORPORATION, OWENS-ILLINOIS, INC., PFIZER, INC., PITTSBURGH CORNING CORPORATION, PPG INDUSTRIES, INC., formerly known as Pittsburgh Plate Glass Company, individually and…

  12. Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · April 27, 1995 · in the opinion

    ACandS, Inc. v. Asner (1995)

    …all of the other companies settled, became bankrupt, or were dismissed from the case. AC & S was dismissed from the Payne action. Appellants cross-claimed for contribution against Owens-Illinois, Inc., GAF, Inc., Pittsburgh Corning Corporation…

  13. Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of California · March 31, 2023 · in the opinion

    Elorreaga v. Rockwell Automation, Inc. (2023)

    …CV-00325-HSG, 2021 WL 1167638, at [\5] (N.D. Cal. Mar. 26, 2021) (quoting Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc., 16 Cal. 4th 953, 958, 67 Cal.Rptr.2d 16, 941 P.2d 1203 (Cal. 1997)…

  14. Court case · California Court of Appeal · September 1, 2009 · in the opinion

    Walmach v. Wheeler (2009)

    …At the most fundamental level, there is scientific uncertainty regarding the biological mechanisms by which inhalation of certain microscopic fibers of asbestos leads to lung cancer and mesothelioma." (Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1997) 16 Cal…

  15. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · January 25, 2012 · in the opinion

    Rabovsky v. Goulds Pumps (In re Asbestos Products Liability Litigation (NO. VI), 2012)

    …the ability to establish specific testing relating to a particular plaintiff is exceedingly problematic. See, e.g. Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, 941 P.2d 1203, 16 Cal. 4th 953, 957 (Ca.1997).\[5\] It is clear…

  16. Court case · California Court of Appeal · October 18, 2006 · in the opinion

    Weber v. John Crane, Inc. (2006)

    …the defendant with enough frequency and regularity as to show a reasonable medical probability that this exposure was a factor in causing the plaintiff's injuries. (Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1997) 16 Cal.4th 953…

  17. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of New Jersey · December 19, 2016 · in the opinion

    Vesper v. 3M Company (2016)

    …Inc.; Honeywell International Inc.; IMO Industries Inc.; Ingersoll-Rand Company; Marley Wylain Company; Motion Control Industries; Notte Safety Appliance Company; Owens-Illinois, Inc.; Sid Harvey Industries, Inc.; Union Carbide Corporation; Warren Pumps; and Weil-McLain Company…

  18. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit · September 15, 1986 · in the opinion

    Dykes v. Raymark Industries, Inc. (1986)

    …969, 99 S.Ct. 461, 58 L.Ed.2d 428 (1978)). In a more recent decision, Murphy v. Owens-Illinois, Inc., 779 F.2d 340 (6th Cir.1985), our court, speaking through Judge Kennedy, upheld the…

  19. Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of California · March 30, 2023 · in the opinion

    Elorreaga v. Rockwell Automation, Inc. (2023)

    …long latency period of asbestos-related disease, and the occupational settings that commonly exposed the worker to multiple forms and brands of asbestos products with varying degrees of toxicity." Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc., 16 Cal…

  20. Court case · California Court of Appeal · April 16, 2008 · in the opinion

    Clemmer v. John Crane, Inc. (2008)

    …new 2003). We have reviewed the instructions given to the jury and conclude that there was no error. Our Supreme Court addressed the issue of causation in asbestos cases in Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1997…