No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

122 results for “Union Carbide Corporation”, page 2 of 7

  1. Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of California · March 11, 2019 · in the opinion

    Viale v. Air & Liquid Systems Corp. (2019)

    …Amaro, Goetz, Hillyard, Barnes & Reinholtz LLP & Thomas Alan Steig, Prindle, Goetz, Barnes & Reinholtz LLP. Union Carbide Corporation, Defendant, represented by Florence Anne McClain, Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith LLP. Foster Wheeler LLC, Defendant, represented by Charles S…

  2. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit · October 1, 2021 · in the opinion

    Dietrich v. Boeing Company (2021)

    …INC., Brenntag West, Inc. f/k/a SOCO- Lynch Corporation successor in interest to Western Chemical and Manufacturing, Co.; THE PEP BOYS-MANNY, MOE AND. JACK OF CALIFORNIA; UNION CARBIDE CORPORATION; WESTERN AUTO SUPPLY COMPANY; DOES…

  3. Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of California · July 3, 2019 · in the opinion

    Viale v. Air & Liquid Systems Corp. (2019)

    …Amaro, Goetz, Hillyard, Barnes & Reinholtz LLP & Thomas Alan Steig, Prindle, Goetz, Barnes & Reinholtz LLP. Union Carbide Corporation, Defendant, represented by Florence Anne McClain, Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith LLP. Foster Wheeler LLC, Defendant, represented by Charles S…

  4. Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of California · May 21, 2019 · in the opinion

    Viale v. Air & Liquid Systems Corp. (2019)

    …Amaro, Goetz, Hillyard, Barnes & Reinholtz LLP & Thomas Alan Steig, Prindle, Goetz, Barnes & Reinholtz LLP. Union Carbide Corporation, Defendant, represented by Florence Anne McClain, Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith LLP. Foster Wheeler LLC, Defendant, represented by Charles S…

  5. Court case · California Court of Appeal · March 25, 2021 · in the opinion

    Putt v. Ford Motor Co. (In re Laosd Asbestos Cases, 2021)

    … Industrial Holdings Corporation; Ingersoll-Rand Company; John Crane Inc.; Kelly Moore Paint Company, Inc.; The Pep Boys, Manny, Moe & Jack of California; Pneumo Abex LLC; Soco West, Inc.; and Union Carbide Corporation. \[2\] For the first…

  6. Court case · U.S. District Court, Central District of California · February 12, 2013

    Nelson v. Air and Liquid Systems Corp. (2013)

    …Laval, Crane, Nash, Kaiser Gypsum and Union Carbide, dismissing the widow's negligence, strict liability and conspiracy claims for lack of evidence that her husband was exposed to asbestos from their products. Under California law, a…

  7. Court case · California Court of Appeal · September 8, 2015 · in the opinion

    Shiffer v. CBS Corporation (2015)

    … Izell v. Union Carbide Corp. (2014) 231 Cal.App.4th 962, 971 \[180 Cal.Rptr.3d 382\] \[even if Union Carbide's asbestos compound made it to a jobsite, "this still leaves speculation about whether Mr…

  8. Court case · California Court of Appeal · May 18, 2021 · in the opinion

    Phipps v. Copeland Corporation LLC (2021)

    …Asbestos Cases (2020) 44 Cal.App.5th 475, 488; see Izell v. Union Carbide Corp. (2014) 231 Cal.App.4th 962, 975 (Izell) \["As our Supreme Court explained in Rutherford, \\[t\]he substantial factor standard is…

  9. Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of California · March 28, 2016 · in the opinion

    Walashek v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2016)

    …P\]roof that raises mere speculation, suspicion, surmise, guess or conjecture is not enough to sustain \[the plaintiff's\] burden' of persuasion." Izell v. Union Carbide Corp., 231 Cal. App. 4th 962, 969 (2014) (quoting Ulwelling…

  10. Court case · California Court of Appeal · November 30, 2021 · in the opinion

    Webb v. General Cable Corp. (2021)

    …Berg, at p. 637 \["\speculation' that the product \[the plaintiff\] used might have contained asbestos is insufficient"\]; Izell v. Union Carbide Corp., supra, 231 Cal.App.4th at p. 969 \["\\[P\]roof that raises mere speculation…

  11. Court case · California Court of Appeal · June 21, 2021 · in the opinion

    Benavidez v. Fluor Corp. (2021)

    …causation.'" (Petitpas v. Ford Motor Co. (2017) 13 Cal.App.5th 261, 289; see Izell v. Union Carbide Corp. (2014) 231 Cal.App.4th 962, 969; McGonnell v. Kaiser Gypsum Co. (2002) 98 Cal.App.4th…

  12. Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of California · July 21, 2014 · in the opinion

    Willis v. Buffalo Pumps Inc. (2014)

    …by virtue of their employment, deemed to be sophisticated users."); Stewart v. Union Carbide Corp., 190 Cal.App.4th 23, 29-30, 117 Cal.Rptr.3d 791 (2010) (rejecting argument that defendant "was entitled to rely…

  13. Court case · California Court of Appeal · March 17, 2017 · in the opinion

    Phillips v. Honeywell International Inc. (2017)

    …at p. 86.) In Izell v. Union Carbide Corp. (2014) 231 Cal.App.4th 962 (Izell), the owner of a residential construction business was diagnosed with mesothelioma and sued more than 20 manufacturers or suppliers allegedly…

  14. Court case · California Court of Appeal · October 8, 2014 · in the opinion

    Gottschall v. Crane Co. (2014)

    …court relied, has no application to the facts here, as illustrated by Stewart v. Union Carbide Corp. (2010) 190 Cal.App.4th 23, 28-30 \[117 Cal.Rptr.3d 791\] (Stewart) and Pfeifer v. John Crane…

  15. Court case · California Supreme Court · May 23, 2016 · in the opinion

    Webb v. Special Electric Company, Inc. (2016)

    …com. n, pp. 309-310; Aubin v. Union Carbide Corp., supra, 177 So.3d at p. 515.) It is also significant if, under the circumstances giving rise to the plaintiff's claim, the intermediary itself had…

  16. Court case · California Court of Appeal · August 2, 2012 · in the opinion

    Rollin v. Foster Wheeler, LLC (2012)

    …applies only if a manufacturer provided adequate warnings to the intermediary. \[Citations.\]" (Stewart v. Union Carbide Corp. (2010) 190 Cal.App.4th 23, 29.) No California court has applied the sophisticated intermediary doctrine to absolve a…

  17. Court case · California Court of Appeal · September 13, 2021 · in the opinion

    Vanni v. Honeywell International, Inc. (2021)

    …to support the verdict. We review the sufficiency of the evidence under the substantial evidence standard of review. (Izell v. Union Carbide Corp. (2014) 231 Cal.App.4th 962, 969.) Under that standard, we consider all…

  18. Court case · California Court of Appeal · January 27, 2021 · in the opinion

    Morgan v. JM Manufacturing Co., Inc. (2021)

    …not its sufficiency as evidence. (See Izell v. Union Carbide Corp. (2014) 231 Cal.App.4th 962, 974 \[180 Cal.Rptr.3d 382\].) It is "the province of the jury to resolve the conflicts in the…

  19. Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of California · March 30, 2021 · in the opinion

    Pizarro v. National Steel and Shipbuilding Company (2021)

    …California, "\[p\]unitive damages can be awarded only where the jury finds oppression, fraud, or malice by clear and convincing evidence." Stewart v. Union Carbide Corp., 190 Cal.App. 4th 23, 34 (2010) (internal citations omitted)…

  20. Court case · California Court of Appeal · February 2, 2017 · in the opinion

    Johnson v. ArvinMeritor, Inc. (2017)

    …evidence of exposure in asbestos personal injury cases. Particularly instructive is Izell v. Union Carbide Corp. (2014) 231 Cal.App.4th 962 \[180 Cal.Rptr.3d 382\] (Izell). The plaintiff ran a construction company from 1964…