No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

425 results for “General Electric”, page 20 of 22

  1. Court case · New York Supreme Court · July 31, 2019 · in the opinion

    Carlstrand v. Domco Prods. of Texas (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2019)

    …judgment on plaintiffs' claim for punitive damages. Defendant contends that plaintiffs failed to proffer any expert opinion or other evidence establishing general and specific causation that any of its Azrock vinyl asbestos floor products caused Mr…

  2. Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York · October 19, 2016 · in the opinion

    Holzworth v. Alfa Laval Inc. (2016)

    …14-650:11, Aug. 8, 2012). He also swept up the debris from the heater, although he acknowledged it was mixed with the general mess from the fire. (See id. 650:3-11, Aug. 8, 2012)…

  3. Court case · New York Supreme Court · September 11, 2023 · in the opinion

    Rasso v. Avon Prods., Inc. (2023)

    …to causation, defendant Colgate claims that under Parker v Mobil Oil Corp., 7NY3d 434 (2006), plaintiff must establish general causation by providing evidence that asbestos as a component of talc causes mesothelioma. Plaintiff, in fact, offers…

  4. Court case · New York Supreme Court · February 7, 2014 · in the opinion

    Golden v. Alliance Laundry Sys. (2014)

    …Q. In the area in which you were present when they were applying the Kaylo, whose sleeping quarters was that work being performed in? A. In the — our sleeping quarters, the general seamen. . . . Q. Okay. What…

  5. Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of New York · April 29, 2020 · in the opinion

    Castro v. Colgate-Palmolive Company (2020)

    …38-39 (2d Cir. 1997) (internal quotation marks and citations omitted). "Where a party only raises general objections, a district court need only satisfy itself there is no clear error on the face of the record…

  6. Court case · New York Supreme Court · July 12, 2012 · in the opinion

    Lovaglio v. AW Chesterton Co. (2012)

    …to obtain cross-examination is in any sense attributable to the cross-examiner's own consent or fault, the lack of cross-examination is of course no objection — according to the general principle... that an opportunity…

  7. Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York · February 8, 1990 · in the opinion

    Barnett v. City of Yonkers (1990)

    …News 1426, 1428. In the Asbestos Act, Congress directed the Attorney General of the United States to ascertain the feasibility of recovering "from any person determined" to be liable the costs of detecting, removing, and replacing…

  8. Court case · New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division · August 6, 2020 · in the opinion

    Matter of New York City Asbestos Litig. v. Air & Liquid Sys. Corp. (2020)

    …toxin, that the toxin is capable of causing the particular illness (general causation) and that plaintiff was exposed to sufficient levels of the toxin to cause the illness (specific causation)" (Parker v Mobil Oil Corp., 7…

  9. Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York · January 21, 2016 · in the opinion

    Holzworth v. Alfa Laval Inc. (2016)

    …in causing the injury he suffered." See Lindstrom v. A-C Prod. Liab. Tr., 424 F.3d 488, 492 (6th Cir. 2005) (general maritime law); In re Joint E. & S. Dists. Asbestos Litig., No. 92 Civ…

  10. Court case · New York Supreme Court · January 13, 2020 · in the opinion

    Rothlein v. Whittaker Clark & Daniels (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2020)

    …of this Order with Notice of Entry pursuant to NYSCEF e-filing protocol on the remaining parties, the General Clerk's Office and the County Clerk's Office, who are directed to mark their records accordingly…

  11. Court case · New York Supreme Court · April 28, 2023 · in the opinion

    Campise v. Arkema, Inc. (2023)

    …tort cases: (1) that the plaintiff was exposed to a toxin, (2) that the toxin is capable of causing the particular illness (general causation), and (3) that the plaintiff was exposed to sufficient levels of the…

  12. Court case · New York Supreme Court · July 16, 2007 · in the opinion

    Aguirre v. Long IS. Rail RD. Co. (2007)

    …motion, the LIRR primarily argues that the plaintiffs failed at trial to proffer legally sufficient evidence to support their claims of general and specific causation with respect to their alleged exposure to asbestos and unidentified dusts…

  13. Court case · New York Supreme Court · June 5, 2006 · in the opinion

    Dankenbrink v. Foster Wheeler (Matter of New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2006)

    …products during overlapping periods of time from the 1940's to the 1990's so that the state of the art testimony and other expert testimony in a general way will be substantially common to all…

  14. Court case · New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division · August 29, 2017 · in the opinion

    South v. Chevron Corp. (Matter of New York City Asbestos Litig., 2017)

    …276 \[2011\] \[internal quotation marks omitted\]). Because the subject release is governed by the law applicable to Jones Act claims and general maritime law, the responsibility is Texaco's to establish the enforceability of the release…

  15. Court case · New York Supreme Court · June 19, 2019 · in the opinion

    Peralta v. Cyprus Amax Minerals Co. (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2019)

    …to form CAMC. CAMC moved to dismiss for lack of general or specific personal jurisdiction. This Court held that general jurisdiction could not be exercised over CAMC because it was not incorporated nor had its principal…

  16. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit · March 30, 1988 · in the opinion

    Kane v. Johns-Manville Corp. (1988)

    …that Kane is a "person aggrieved" by the Bankruptcy Court's order confirming the Plan. As a general rule, creditors have standing to appeal orders of the bankruptcy court disposing of property of the estate because…

  17. Court case · New York Supreme Court · February 6, 2020 · in the opinion

    Schrank v. Amchem Prods., Inc. (2020)

    …increased risk for lung cancer among vehicle mechanics. This is with the caveat that since smoking rates amongst vehicle mechanics are much higher compared to the general population, studies that do no account for the effect…

  18. Court case · New York Supreme Court · December 3, 2013 · in the opinion

    Barawa v. Acker Drill Co. (2013)

    …to warn against asbestos-containing products that were manufactured by third-party suppliers. While in general the court will not even consider arguments made for the first time in reply papers, Azzopardi v American Blower Corp.…

  19. Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York · June 15, 1998 · in the opinion

    Consorti v. Owens Corning Fiberglas Corp. (In Re Joint Eastern and Southern Dist. Asbestos, 1998)

    …as a mechanical formula, awards based on the number of months of suffering \[have been\] criticized ..., it nevertheless represents a general pattern to the New York cases." Id. The Dollas court, nonetheless, rejected the simplistic monthly…

  20. Court case · New York Supreme Court · December 14, 2018 · in the opinion

    Rothlein v. Johnson & Johnson (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2018)

    …Co., 294 A.D. 2d 900, 741 N.Y.S. 2d 803 \[4th Dept. 2002\], CPLR § 2001 and Status General Development, Inc. v. 501 Broadway Partners, LLC, 163 A.D. 3d 740, 82 N.Y.S…