445 results for “General Electric”, page 20 of 23
-
Court case · Montana Workers' Comp. Court · September 26, 2018 · in the opinion
Atchley v. Louisiana Pacific Corp. (2018)
…part, as follows: Once LA-contaminated soil is removed from properties \[in Libby\], various types of fill materials are used to backfill excavated areas. In general, fill materials consist of topsoil and topsoil amendments, common fill…
-
Court case · U.S. Bankruptcy Court, Southern District of New York · October 1, 1996 · in the opinion
In re Waterman SS Corp. (1996)
…on MALC. An even more persuasive basis for placing the burden of proof on MALC is the general rule that when the true facts relating to a dispute are particularly within the knowledge of one party…
-
Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · March 9, 2006 · in the opinion
Mobil Oil Corp. v. Bailey (2006)
…972 S.W.2d at 728). Helton, 133 S.W.3d at 254. Toxic tort cases usually require proof of both "general" and "specific" causation with regard to the effects of the toxic substance. Frias v…
-
Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · October 28, 2005 · in the opinion
Adams v. Asbestos Corp. Ltd. (2005)
…Earth, including consideration of the chemistry of its constituent materials. These general definitions indicate that knowledge or understanding of chemical compositions and compounds is required in the scientific specialties of geology and geochemistry. Considering Dr. De…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · April 2, 2009 · in the opinion
In re New York City Asbestos Litigation v. AC & S., Inc. (2009)
…Dalton was a plumber, Flynn was an iron worker, McNamara was a roofer, Troiano was a plumber/general contractor and Zeitler was a sailor/painter (see Comeford Aff. in Support of Consolidation OSC at ¶¶ 7-18…
-
Court case · Indiana Court of Appeals · April 26, 1999 · in the opinion
Holmes v. ACandS, Inc. (1999)
…year discovery based statute of limitations applicable to product liability claims. The comprehensiveness of the medical malpractice act is evidence of the legislature's intent that it should prevail over the more general wrongful death statute…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of Illinois · December 22, 2014 · in the opinion
Krik v. Crane Co. (2014)
…Arnold Brody, who intend to testify that, in general, each and every exposure to asbestos products results in injury to the person so exposed. Krik believes that this testimony will help him to establish that his…
-
Court case · Michigan Supreme Court · December 29, 1986 · in the opinion
Larson v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp. (1986)
…The general position is that "\[t\]he only practical time when the cause of action can be deemed to have accrued is the time when the plaintiff knows or should have known that he had asbestosis…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · May 22, 2012 · in the opinion
Barker v. Hennessy Industries, Inc. (2012)
…A Manufacturer Owes No General Duty to Warn of Defects in Another Manufacturer's Product. A manufacturer's duty to warn does not extend to hazards arising solely from other products. The decedent in O'Neil…
-
Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit · August 11, 1986 · in the opinion
Shelly v. Johns-Manville Corp. (1986)
…those injured "are by coincidence employees but at the time of injury are not engaged in the business of the employer and are in their independent capacities as members of the general public."). In our view…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of Florida · September 3, 2024 · in the opinion
Edmonds v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2024)
…Zhang's two key challenged statements. The Court agrees with Defendants on one general point. The "cumulative exposure theory," to the extent it holds that even a de minimis exposure to asbestos can be a substantial…
-
Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · December 5, 2000 · in the opinion
Brunet v. Avondale Industries, Inc. (2000)
…should be held strictly liable for the injuries that Brunet sustained. The trial court did not err in awarding Brunet $250,000 in general damages. I do not believe that the award is beyond that which…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · October 30, 2013 · in the opinion
Steiner v. Volkswagen Group OF America, Inc. (2013)
…fn. 22. As defendants point out, Ledesma referred to the scope of expert cross-examination in general, as set forth in section 721, subdivision (a), and did not address the limits of permissible cross-examination regarding…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · May 4, 2012 · in the opinion
Bettencourt v. Hennessy Industries, Inc. (2012)
…plaintiffs' injuries. I. Standard of Review A motion for judgment on the pleadings is analogous to a general demurrer. (Ludgate, supra, 82 Cal.App.4th at p. 602.) Like a general demurrer, it tests the sufficiency…
-
Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · July 20, 1992 · in the opinion
Marinari v. Asbestos Corp., Ltd. (1992)
…TAMILIA, KELLY and JOHNSON, JJ. [\442] WIEAND, Judge: The general issue in this asbestos exposure action is whether Pennsylvania, in the context of asbestos actions, shall be a one-disease or two-disease state. More specifically…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · February 21, 2014 · in the opinion
Davis v. Ace Hardware Corporation (2014)
…at 750-52. In a non-fraud case, Federal Rule 8's "General Rules of Pleading" apply, requiring that a complaint in federal court contain only a "short and plain statement of the claim showing that…
-
Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · August 11, 1998 · in the opinion
McClure v. Owens Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1998)
…even though both individuals deny it. In any event, plaintiffs do not rely solely upon parallel action to prove their cases. A defendant who understands the general objectives of the conspiratorial scheme, accepts them, and agrees…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · November 13, 1996 · in the opinion
Hansen v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1996)
…is one of the four plaintiffs in the wrongful death action of Mary Hansen. [\761] (5) "The general rule is that \an appeal reviews the correctness of a judgment as of the time of its rendition…
-
Court case · Michigan Court of Appeals · January 23, 1985 · in the opinion
Larson v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp. (1985)
…F Supp 674, fn 4. See also Jackson v Johns-Manville Sales Corp, 727 F2d 506 (CA 5, 1984). In Funk v General Motors Corp, 392 Mich 91, 104; 220 NW2d 641 (1974), the Supreme Court…
-
Court case · Illinois Supreme Court · October 21, 1999 · in the opinion
McClure v. Owens Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1999)
…could look beyond these problems, I still would not agree with the majority's decision. A defendant is liable as a conspirator where he understands the general objectives of the conspiratorial scheme, accepts them, and agrees…