No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

547 results for “General Electric”, page 20 of 28

  1. Court case · California Court of Appeal · August 12, 1999 · in the opinion

    Overly v. Ingalls Shipbuilding, Inc. (1999)

    …Mississippi. Their general theory of negligence is that Ingalls knew or should have known about the dangers of asbestos and nevertheless exposed Robert to those dangers without providing any warning or protection. I. Exposure and causation…

  2. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · May 13, 2020 · in the opinion

    Gomez v. Aardvark Contractors, Inc. (2020)

    …Practice and Procedure § 4455 (3d ed. 1998). "The general rule is that \a judgment in a class action will bind the absent members of the class.'" Richardson v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., 839 F.3d…

  3. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of New York · December 7, 1989 · in the opinion

    Rummo v. The Celotex Corp. (In re Joint Eastern & Southern Dist. Asbestos Lit., 1989)

    …Ed. 1188 (1938). But this state's highest courts have not definitively analyzed the issue in published opinions. We turn therefore to the general law of torts, as would New York's highest court. MacPherson v…

  4. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit · December 10, 2010 · in the opinion

    Albina Engine & Machine v. Director, Owcp (2010)

    …4\] ALJ Berlin also found that Dr. Zbinden's and Claimant's testimony only establishes that the Decedent thought he was exposed to asbestos in his shipyard employment in general, and not that Decedent specifically thought…

  5. Court case · New York Supreme Court · November 23, 2015 · in the opinion

    Hernandez-Vega v. Fisher Controls Int'l (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2015)

    …early 1960s; and that any packing sold by Fisher for use with its valves was pre-sized. Arguments Fisher maintains that this court lacks both general and specific jurisdiction. This argument was not waived, Fisher asserts…

  6. Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · July 21, 2010 · in the opinion

    Marchand v. Asbestos Defendants (2010)

    …s executive officers and Continental Insurance Company (Continental) as the successor by merger to Fidelity and Casualty Company of New York (Fidelity), in its capacity as the general liability carrier of Pendleton. On January 14, 2010…

  7. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit · January 21, 1985 · in the opinion

    Jackson v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp. (1985)

    …As a consequence, federal courts would become increasingly responsible for establishing a general federal tort law in a manner we think is inconsistent with the teachings of Erie and the logic behind our federal system. Cf…

  8. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · November 19, 1984 · in the opinion

    Colombo v. Johns-Manville Corp. (1984)

    13, 68 L.Ed.2d 1 (1981) (federal law shall govern issues arising in negligence actions under LHWCA section 5(b)) with Edmonds v. Compagnie Generale Atlantique, 443 U.S. 256, 272 n. 31, 99 S…

  9. Court case · California Court of Appeal · November 14, 2007 · in the opinion

    Rosen v. Regents of University of California (2007)

    …and premises liability. They sought both general and punitive damages.\[6\] A first amended complaint was filed in May 2002, adding causes of action against the Regents for making false representations and for loss of consortium…

  10. Court case · Louisiana Supreme Court · February 24, 1986 · in the opinion

    Halphen v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp. (1986)

    …reasons for the precepts and answers. 1. Legal Precepts There is general agreement upon the most basic principles of strict tort products liability. In order to recover from a manufacturer, the plaintiff must prove that the…

  11. Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · September 8, 1993 · in the opinion

    Keene Corp. v. Rogers (1993)

    …Keene does not dispute that Alabama law should control the case in general but it contends that since the appellees did not prove and the trial court did not judicially notice any Alabama law on this…

  12. Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington · June 4, 2024 · in the opinion

    Perkins v. United States (2024)

    …b)(6) designees could not answer questions about the U.S. Navy's general knowledge of asbestos-related health hazards between 1968 and March 1974 (Topic 1); Harang Joseph Perkins' duties on the U.S.S…

  13. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit · June 19, 2015 · in the opinion

    Wilde v. Huntington Ingalls, Incorporated (2015)

    …nor does it describe in any detail their relative requirements. As a result, we have no basis for determining how precise or general these specifications actually are. Without that information, necessary for Boyle's first prong…

  14. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit · January 11, 2018 · in the opinion

    Morgan v. Huntington Ingalls, Incorporated (2018)

    …These cases are better characterized as standing for the general idea that a deposition can constitute an "other paper" than for actually deciding whether the defendant must remove within thirty days of the testimony or the…

  15. Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · January 11, 2011 · in the opinion

    Arnold v. Saberhagen Holdings, Inc. (2011)

    …BOILER COMPANY, a division of AMERICAN RADIATOR & STANDARD SANITARY COMPANY; TRICO CONTRACTING, INC., TRANSALTA CENTRALIA GENERATION, LLC; UNION CARBIDE CORPORATION; GENERAL CONSTRUCTION CO.; WRIGHT SCHUCHART HARBOR CO., WEYERHAUSER COMPANY; ZURN INDUSTRIES LLC; GOULDS PUMPS (IPG), INC.;…

  16. Court case · U.S. Bankruptcy Court, Southern District of New York · December 10, 1992 · in the opinion

    In re Prudential Lines, Inc. (1992)

    …however, that Asbestosis Claimants' position misconstrues the general rules of insurance law and contractual interpretation applicable here. At the most basic level, the P & I policies that PLI purchased were yearly contracts for indemnification for losses…

  17. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit · June 30, 1992 · in the opinion

    Feldman v. Owens-Illinois (In re Brooklyn Navy Yard Asbestos Litigation, 1992)

    …statute: "There is no justification for rewarding recalcitrant non-settling defendants by permitting them to apply the General Obligations Law offset in a manner that reduces or even obliterates their own liability in cases where plaintiffs…

  18. Court case · Maryland Court of Appeals · April 7, 1992 · in the opinion

    Owens-Illinois, Inc. v. Armstrong (1992)

    …283 Md. 296, 327, 389 A.2d 887, 905 (1978). Causation is a necessary element of any strict liability action. Phipps v. General Motors Corp., 278 Md. 337, 344, 363 A.2d 955, 958 (1976). In…

  19. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · August 20, 2010 · in the opinion

    Gitto v. AW Chesterton Co., Inc. (2010)

    …at 14-15). After the foundation was complete, the shipfitters were on standby in the general area of the ship when new pieces of equipment were installed by other tradesman. Mr. Gitto testified that while the…

  20. Court case · California Court of Appeal · January 28, 2010 · in the opinion

    Johnson v. Certainteed Corporation (2010)

    …according to Johnson, is on whether "the category of negligent conduct at issue, considering the general character of the event, is sufficiently likely to result in the kind of harm experienced, so that liability may be…