532 results for “General Electric”, page 20 of 27
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · August 11, 2022 · in the opinion
Walls v. Ford Motor Company (2022)
…motion is GRANTED with respect to Finkelstein's testimony concerning specific causation. Defendants' motion is DENIED with respect to Finkelstein's testimony concerning general causation. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants' Motion to Exclude the Testimony…
-
Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · June 1, 1988 · in the opinion
H & H Plumbing Co. v. Indus. Comm'n (1988)
…on claimant's testimony regarding his work on the boilers and the appearance of the gaskets. The Commission also relied on the testimony of Norris, H & H's general foreman, that the gaskets contained asbestos. Moreover…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · October 30, 2019 · in the opinion
Lopez v. the Hillshire Brands Company (2019)
…430, the more general instruction on substantial-factor causation: "A substantial factor in causing harm is a factor that a reasonable person would consider to have contributed to the harm. It must be more than a…
-
Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit · September 28, 2011 · in the opinion
Moeller v. Garlock Sealing Technologies, LLC (2011)
…creates "\such a risk' of an accident of the general nature of the one in question \that an ordinarily prudent company engaged in the manufacture' of such a product \would not have put it on the…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · November 23, 2015 · in the opinion
Hernandez-Vega v. Fisher Controls Int'l (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2015)
…early 1960s; and that any packing sold by Fisher for use with its valves was pre-sized. Arguments Fisher maintains that this court lacks both general and specific jurisdiction. This argument was not waived, Fisher asserts…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Central District of California · July 3, 2013 · in the opinion
Lund v. 3M Company (2013)
…Inc., 223 F.3d 1082, 1086 (9th Cir. 2000)). Factors taken into account when analyzing general jurisdiction include whether the defendant "makes sales, solicits, or engages in business in the state, serves the state's markets…
-
Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit · January 21, 1985 · in the opinion
Jackson v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp. (1985)
…As a consequence, federal courts would become increasingly responsible for establishing a general federal tort law in a manner we think is inconsistent with the teachings of Erie and the logic behind our federal system. Cf…
-
Court case · Oregon Court of Appeals · April 20, 2016 · in the opinion
McKenzie v. AW Chesterson Co. (2016)
…The Washington Supreme Court held that "the general rule" for common-law products liability cases that a product manufacturer has no duty "to warn of the dangers of exposure to asbestos in other manufacturers' products," articulated…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · July 15, 2014 · in the opinion
Herman v. Abex Corp. (2014)
…either bringing one in or taking one out. Other than that there were times when I wasn't shifting that I would be in that general area, because oftentimes they didn't have enough buses to…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · September 23, 2020 · in the opinion
Pruitt v. Gardner Denver (In re Asbestos Litigation, 2020)
…The Court has reviewed the affidavit of Captain Moore and his opinion that: The 1972 general information book records one Gardner Denver horizontal centrifugal emergency fire pump driven by a diesel engine was installed in the…
-
Court case · Ohio Court of Appeals · March 15, 2007 · in the opinion
Vince v. Crane Co. (2007)
…sua sponte order Owens-Illinois, Inc. dismissed from this appeal. \[3\] The General Assembly effectively overruled paragraph two of the syllabus to Horton with the adoption of R.C. 2307.96(B), effective to cases filed…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · July 16, 2014 · in the opinion
Dougherty v. AO Smith Corporation (2014)
…the Supreme Court explained: It is the general rule that an action may be removed from state court to federal court only if a federal district court would have original jurisdiction over the claim in suit…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of California · September 26, 2024 · in the opinion
Smargisso v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2024)
…claims specifically—the claims at issue here. (Dkt. No. 139 at 13.) Thus, Plaintiffs fail to establish that the relief sought has been historically available under general maritime law. See Elorreaga v. Rockwell Automation, Inc., No…
-
Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · July 26, 2007 · in the opinion
Georgia-Pacific Corporation v. Stephens (2007)
…a union composed of plasterers, cement masons, and shophands. The study described plasterers' job duties as follows: Plasterers, in general, are responsible for all interior and exterior plastering of drywall, cement, stucco, and stone imitation as…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · August 20, 2010 · in the opinion
Gitto v. AW Chesterton Co., Inc. (2010)
…at 14-15). After the foundation was complete, the shipfitters were on standby in the general area of the ship when new pieces of equipment were installed by other tradesman. Mr. Gitto testified that while the…
-
Court case · Ohio Court of Appeals · June 23, 2006 · in the opinion
Barone v. Gatx Corp. (2006)
…of asbestos dust. On February 27, 2003, appellee filed a claim for employer intentional tort and wrongful death against appellant, GATX Corporation ("GATX"), General American Transportation Corporation, the Gage Company, I.U. North America, Inc., Garlock…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of Illinois · February 14, 2014 · in the opinion
Quirin v. Lorillard Tobacco Company (2014)
…Salisbury, 2014 WL 345214, at [\8]. This court will follow that middle path. In general, consistent with the bare metal defense, a manufacturer is not liable for materials it did not supply. But a duty may…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · July 24, 2013 · in the opinion
Keeney v. AW Chesterton Company (2013)
…however, to the general rule that \"the voluntary acceptance of the benefit of a judgment or order is a bar to the prosecution of an appeal therefrom..." ... where the appellant's right to the accepted portion…
-
Court case · New Jersey Supreme Court · April 24, 2006 · in the opinion
Olivo v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (2006)
…625 A.2d 1110). B. Applying those general principles of tort liability to the facts of this case, the risk of injury to someone like Eleanor Olivo is one that should have been foreseeable to Exxon…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · June 29, 2007 · in the opinion
Aguirre v. Long Island Railroad Co. (2007)
…motion, the LIRR primarily argues that the plaintiffs failed at trial to proffer legally sufficient evidence to support their claims of general and specific causation with respect to their alleged exposure to asbestos and unidentified dusts…