No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

848 results for “Ford Motor Company”, page 21 of 43

  1. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Missouri · January 21, 2020 · in the opinion

    Douglas v. Johnson & Johnson Consumer, Inc. (2020)

    …No. 2:13-CV-04079, 2013 WL 12155465, at [\5] (W.D. Mo. June 18, 2013); Becker v. Ford Motor Co., No. 4:07CV1573 FRB, 2007 WL 4404168, at [\1] (E.D. Mo. Dec. 17, 2007…

  2. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Michigan · February 17, 1987 · in the opinion

    Marshall v. Celotex Corp. (1987)

    …and alternative liability in Marshall v. Celotex, 651 F.Supp. 389 (E.D.Mich.1987). \[2\] Cousineau v. Ford Motor Co., 140 Mich.App. 19, 33, 363 N.W.2d 721 (1985) ("\[P\]laintiff is entitled…

  3. Lexicon

    Personal Jurisdiction

    …v. Bauman (2014) and Ford Motor Co. v. Montana Eighth Judicial District Court (2021). Significance in Asbestos Context Personal jurisdiction often decides where, and sometimes whether, a patient can sue the companies responsible for their exposure…

  4. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · September 25, 2019 · in the opinion

    Kraus v. Alcatel-Lucent (2019)

    …SYSTEMS/LORAL, Cross Claimant, represented by MICHAEL DAVID SMITH, GLAZIER YEE LLP & WILLIAM R. ADAMS, DICKIE MCCAMEY & CHILCOTE. FORD MOTOR CO., Cross Claimant, represented by DANIEL J. SINCLAIR, ECKERT SEAMANS CHERIN & MELLOTT LLC & ERIC L. HORNE…

  5. Court case · California Court of Appeal · April 26, 2012 · in the opinion

    Bankhead v. Pneumo Abex LLC (2012)

    …87 Cal.App.4th 953, 980.) The case law makes clear that "\[t\]o accomplish this purpose, the award must be assessed against the party actually responsible for the wrong." (Ford Motor Co. v. Home Ins…

  6. Court case · Virginia Supreme Court · January 10, 1992 · in the opinion

    Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. v. Watson (1992)

    …984, 989, 128 S.E.2d 273, 277 (1962) (citations omitted). See also Ford Motor Co. v. Phelps, 239 Va. 272, 276, 389 S.E.2d 454, 457 (1990); General Motors Corp. v. Lupica, 237 Va…

  7. Court case · Texas Supreme Court · June 5, 1998 · in the opinion

    Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. v. Malone (1998)

    …W.2d at 30. Once the defendant does so, information which might otherwise be irrelevant and not subject to discovery becomes both relevant and discoverable. See generally Ford Motor Co. v. Leggat, 904 S.W.2d…

  8. Court case · California Court of Appeal · October 22, 2014 · in the opinion

    Izell v. Union Carbide Corp. (2014)

    …Cal.App.4th 655, 690-691 \[71 Cal.Rptr.3d 775\].) As our Supreme Court stated in Johnson v. Ford Motor Co. (2005) 35 Cal.4th 1191 \[29 Cal.Rptr.3d 401, 113 P.3d 82…

  9. Court case · Maryland Court of Appeals · December 18, 2015 · in the opinion

    May v. Air & Liquid Systems Corp. (2015)

    …strict liability analysis. Common sense tells us that the pumps were what Respondents sold to the Navy, and the gaskets and packing are included within that product. We have studied Ford Motor Co. v. Wood and…

  10. Court case · New York Court of Appeals · June 28, 2016 · in the opinion

    Mtr OF Nyc Asbestos Litig. (2016)

    …v Frank Hrubetz & Co., 261 Md 141, 146-149, 274 A2d 107, 110-112 \[1971\]; Tibbetts v Ford Motor Co., 4 Mass App Ct 738, 741, 358 NE2d 460, 461-462 \[1976\]; see also Restatement \[Third…

  11. Court case · California Supreme Court · January 12, 2012 · in the opinion

    O'neil v. Crane Co. (2012)

    …plaintiffs' assertion on appeal, the case had not been tried or submitted to the jury on the theory that Ford had a duty to warn about hazards in replacement brakes and clutches. (Ford Motor v. Wood…

  12. Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · August 5, 2014 · in the opinion

    Nelson v. Airco Welders Supply (2014)

    …Engineering, Ford Motor Co., Foseco, Inc., Foster Wheeler Corporation, Garlock, Inc., General Electric Company, General Motors Corp., George V. Hamilton, Inc., Georgia- Pacific Corporation, Gould Pumps, Inc., Green, Tweed & Company, Inc., Hajoca Plumbing Supply Company, Harnischfeger…

  13. Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · August 20, 2010 · in the opinion

    Laverty v. CSX Transportation, Inc. (2010)

    …BUDD COMPANY, CATERPILLAR, INC., CERTAIN-TEED CORPORATION, CONTINENTAL TEVES, INC., DAIMLER CHRYSLER CORPORATION, ENPRO INDUSTRIES, INC., FLEXO SUPPLY COMPANY, FORD CORPORATION, GARLOCK, INC., GENERAL ELECTRIC MOTOR COMPANY, FOSTER WHEELER ENERGY COMPANY, GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION, GEORGIA-PACIFIC…

  14. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · July 25, 2019 · in the opinion

    Kraus v. Alcatel-Lucent (2019)

    …REILLY, REILLY JANICZEK & MCDEVITT, PC, STEPHEN SCOTT, REILLY MCDEVITT & HENRICH & SUSAN M. VALINIS, REILLY JANICZEK & MCDEVITT P.C. FORD MOTOR CO., Defendant, represented by DANIEL J. SINCLAIR, ECKERT SEAMANS CHERIN & MELLOTT LLC & ERIC L. HORNE, ECKERT…

  15. Exposure sites · Ohio

    Ohio Asbestos Exposure Sites: Worksites, Industries, and Trust Coverage

    …millwrights, pipefitters, and electricians who kept the lines running worked around it every shift. Ford Motor Cleveland engine plants and foundry YoungstownYoungstown was the heart of the Mahoning Valley steel industry: Youngstown Sheet & Tube, Republic Steel…

  16. Court case · California Court of Appeal · November 21, 2014 · in the opinion

    Izell v. Union Carbide Corporation (2014)

    …(2008) 159 Cal.App.4th 655, 690-691.) As our Supreme Court stated in Johnson v. Ford Motor Co. (2005) 35 Cal.4th 1191, "\[t\]o consider the defendant's entire course of conduct in setting…

  17. Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · February 14, 2005 · in the opinion

    Lunsford v. Saberhagen Holdings, Inc. (2005)

    …103 Wash.2d 768, 774, 698 P.2d 77 (1985). ANALYSIS In Ulmer v. Ford Motor Co., 75 Wash.2d 522, 452 P.2d 729 (1969), the Washington Supreme Court adopted the Restatement (Second) of Torts…

  18. Court case · Maryland Court of Appeals · June 11, 2002 · in the opinion

    Crane, Inc. v. Scribner (2002)

    …2d at 996. In adopting 1990 as the critical date when the cause of action arose, the court, though supposedly applying Grimshaw, essentially applied the manifestation test. In Ford Motor Co. v. Wood, 119 Md. App…

  19. Court case · California Court of Appeal · September 24, 2012 · in the opinion

    Evans v. Certainteed Corp. (2012)

    …e.g. Campbell v. Ford Motor Co. (2012) 206 Cal.App.4th 15, 33.) A jury returned a verdict in favor of a plaintiff homemaker who suffered personal injuries caused by her exposure to asbestos dust…

  20. Court case · Ohio Court of Appeals · May 26, 2016 · in the opinion

    Schwartz v. Honeywell Internatl., Inc. (2016)

    …Cleveland, OH, for Ford Motor Co. General Electric Corporation, CT Corporation Systems, Cleveland, OH, for General Electric Corporation. Genuine Parts Company c/o Grant Norris SA, Columbus, OH, for Genuine Parts Company. Pneumo Abex Corp. Successor…